April 15, 2009
Last
week the Vermont legislature overrode the governor to legalize gay
marriage. The week before, the Iowa Supreme Court achieved the same
result by overriding the state legislature, declaring a 1998 ban on
same-sex marriage unconstitutional. If you think the benefits of
civil marriage should be available to all couples regardless of
sexual orientation, should you care how we get there? Senior Editor
Jacob Sullum argues that you should, because the approach taken in
Iowa, although liberty-enhancing in that case, ultimately
undermines a constitution's ability to constrain government action
and protect individual freedom.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.