In the past few
years, some courts have tried a novel idea: letting jurors actively
participate instead of serving as courtroom ornamentation. The
federal courts in the 7th Circuit, encompassing Illinois, Indiana,
and Wisconsin, conducted an experiment in which members of the jury
sitting in civil trials were allowed to submit questions for anyone
testifying. From all the evidence, writes Steve Chapman, justice
was well served.
Reason Magazine
New at Reason: Steve Chapman on Letting Jurors Ask Questions During Trial
Leave a Comment
Most Popular Stories
- It’s Enough to Literally Make Your Head Explode (2.3)
- Fox Business Network Cancels Judge Andrew Napolitano's Freedom Watch (2.9)
- The Second Amendment Cases the Supreme Court Doesn't Want to Hear (2.9)
- Oklahoma Legislator: Let's Tax "Violent" Video Games (2.3)
- One Possible Reason There Are So Few Liberals, Starring Jonathan Chait. And Some Stuff About Tax Progressivity. (2.10)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Romney Most Electable Candidate, Yet Gingrich in Statistical Tie Among GOP Voters (1.31)
- Explaining Newt’s Second Surge (1.26)
- George Washington Would Beat Out Romney as Richest President; John Kerry Would Have, Too (1.25)
- New Poll: Americans Aren't Ready for Another War (1.20)
- 2012 Election Match Up: Romney Wins, Paul Might (1.13)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.