Jacob Sullum | March 18, 2009
Less than a day
after Michael McLendon fired his last shot, gun control groups
issued press releases that cited his murderous rampage through
three Alabama towns as an argument for reviving the federal
"assault weapon" ban. The Obama administration also wants to bring
back the ban, on the theory that outlawing the firearms supposedly
favored by gangbangers and homicidal maniacs will reduce the
casualties they inflict. But Senior Editor Jacob Sullum argues
there is little reason to believe such laws can deliver on that
promise.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.