March 9, 2009
In Sunday's
New York Post, Reason.tv Editor in Chief Nick Gillespie
revewed Licentious Gotham: Erotic Publishing and Its
Prosecution in 19th-Century New York. A snippet:
"Licentious Gotham," a new history by Rutgers law professor Donna Dennis, covers [the wide variety of erotica] and much more in riveting and good-natured detail. It's not just her descriptions and reproductions of old-fashioned dirty pictures that hold the reader's attention. Her discussion and analysis of legal and social responses to the growth of erotica is as compelling as it is comprehensive. Civic leaders fretted that passion-inducing material "posed a special risk of harm because it represented the antithesis of rational, ordered liberty," writes Dennis. As the makers of contemporary porn—and video games, movies, and music—could tell you, such fears are alive and well in contemporary America.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Silas, this woman is showing her privates! I can see her entire ankle!
Seriously. 19th Century porn and only three posts after three
hours? Y'all should be ashamed. Poor thread.
I will say that the past, much like Japan, needs a shitload of
disposable razors.
That image is a portrait of the eminent French neurologist
Charcot with one of his hysteria patients. It's a detail from a
much larger painting that can be seen in B&W here:
http://www.freud.org.uk/wwork.htm
Either the person who picked this illustration is a complete
bonehead, or this is a brilliant in-joke that I can't
understand.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245