Nick Gillespie | February 24, 2009
Via
Drudge and the TriCity
Herald:
The state of Washington sent out $1 checks to the 250,000 food stamp recipients in the state.
The director of the Community Services Division for the Department of Social and Health Services, Leo Ribas, says the checks mailed Feb. 17 trigger an additional $43 million in federal food benefits. They also connect recipients to an energy assistance program.
Ribas says the $1 check is a one-time move to leverage the federal money. He says next year the state will be able to trigger the federal assistance through a routine deposit in food stamp accounts.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I wonder what percentage inefficiency was generated with a $1 check sent using $0.30+ postage?
A $43 million return on a $250,000 investment is pretty good.They ought to try it with their pension funds.
As a bonus, this program was a nice stimulus for the post office... generating/saving jobs there. And those administrators who did the grunt work of sending the checks, they were stimulated too! I love "economics".
Remember, entities that make profit and create wealth = BAD (think oil companies); entities that waste capital and destroy wealth = GOOD(think government).
How much stupid stuff do states do to get various federal funding? From the drinking age (thanks Reagan!) to this, the whole federal money thing is so fucked up.
The director of the Community Services Division for the
Department of Social and Health Services, Leo Ribas, says the
checks mailed Feb. 17 trigger an additional $43 million in federal
food benefits.
This reminds me of the '73 Torino my friend had in high school and
the ridiculously complicated procedure required to get it to start
each time we wanted to drive somewhere.
And how many of the recipients have checking a accounts? What
was the fee after taking $1 checks to a check cashing agency?
I once got a $.03 dividend check and several followup letters
asking me to please cash it.
Must have cost $40 total for me to receive three cents.
I wonder what percentage inefficiency was generated with a
$1 check sent using $0.30+ postage?
Miniscule when compared with the $20 or so it cost to write and
account for each check.
Multiplier!
Multiplier!Multiplier!Multiplier!Multiplier!
We MADE money on this!
Does anyone have any detail on how the $1 checks trigger the
federal funding? I would think that would be some interesting
reading.
John
They ought to try it with their pension funds.
I was thinking replacing government pension plans with food stamps.
I'm sure it'll be the other way - I'll be forced to go on food
stamps so govt retirees get full benefits.
Here in Ohio, we can apparently ratchet up the federal funding by cracking down more on seatbelt laws. The Guv is promising to make seat belt infractions a primary violation and start enforcing it this year to trigger our free money.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245