Senior Editor
Radley Balko reports on a forthcoming study from the National
Academy of Sciences that says our criminal courts have been relying
on sloppy evidence and pseudo-scientific quackery.
February 20, 2009
Senior Editor
Radley Balko reports on a forthcoming study from the National
Academy of Sciences that says our criminal courts have been relying
on sloppy evidence and pseudo-scientific quackery.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.