Soccer, rugby, and American football
have a common ancestor: a medieval free-for-all that historians
call "mob
football." According to the ever-reliable Wikipedia, the game
was notable for "having an unlimited number of players and fairly
vague rules. By some accounts, any means could be used to move the
ball to a goal, as long as it did not lead to manslaughter or
murder." With admirable efficiency, players combined the soccer
match and the soccer riot in a single activity.
So as you sink into the couch tomorrow to watch a game, some ads, and a lame halftime show, spare a thought for the days when sports didn't mean spectatorship, and villagers had to either participate or hide:
It was explicitly violent and played between villages, at the time of celebration and festivity. In fact, it was so violent that people living nearby would barricade their windows during matches.
That quote comes from expertfootball.com, which also informs us that the authorities often attempted to suppress the sport:
On April 13, 1314 King Edward II issued one of the first recorded prohibitions, because of the impact that "this hustling over large balls" had on the merchant life. Edward III also tried to stop "futeball" in 1349, followed by Richard II, Henry IV, Henry VI and James III. The game was frowned upon by the bourgeoisie due to its unchristian [sic] nature and its lack of regulations.
By the 17th century, Carew of Cornwall attempted to introduce some sense in his Survey of Cornwall by adding the prohibition of charging players below the girdle and by disallowing the forward pass. These implementations, however, were not widely used and violence continued to [be] relished.
Fight the power. Pass the ball.
Update: The game is still played annually in Ashbourne, England. Here's some footage:
On April 13, 1314 King Edward II issued
one of the first recorded prohibitions, because of the impact that
"this hustling over large balls" had on the merchant life. Edward
III also tried to stop "futeball" in 1349, followed by Richard II,
Henry IV, Henry VI and James III. The game was frowned upon by the
bourgeoisie due to its unchristian [sic] nature and its lack of
regulations.
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSS
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245