One reality of
21st-century religion, writes Steve Chapman, is that many people
treat the Ten Commandments as the Ten Suggestions, to be modified
or ignored without penalty. That same spirit has infected the
Supreme Court, which last week contemplated an abuse of the Bill of
Rights, rolled its eyes and said: Oh, what's the big deal?
Reason Magazine
New at Reason: Steve Chapman on Why the Supreme Court Endorsed Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
← Ryan Frederick Trial Begins Tuesday
|
Main
|
"Post_Moot: A radically inclusive inauguration anthology" →
Leave a Comment
Most Popular Stories
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Romney Most Electable Candidate, Yet Gingrich in Statistical Tie Among GOP Voters (1.31)
- Explaining Newt’s Second Surge (1.26)
- George Washington Would Beat Out Romney as Richest President; John Kerry Would Have, Too (1.25)
- New Poll: Americans Aren't Ready for Another War (1.20)
- 2012 Election Match Up: Romney Wins, Paul Might (1.13)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.