December 18, 2008
In round two of their Los Angeles Times dust-up, reason's Brian Doherty and the Left Business Observer's Doug Henwood debate the significance and dangers of our burgeoning (daily) federal debt. Read it here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Nice job Brian.
I'm not convinced that proportion of GDP is the best way of
measuring the scope and pervasiveness of government. Surely there
are some activities that do not need to be scaled up at the same
rate as population.
Also, I may have missed it, but I don't believe state and local
government were discussed. I wonder what the numbers look like
taking them into account.
Finally, just what is "child care?" I'm not a parent, so am fuzzy
on what it is he wants to take part of my labor for.
Child care. You know, like people taking care of your kid while you work. In places like France, the gov pays for it. My kid will be supporting you in retirement, even if you think you're financing it out of your savings. Because your future savings mean nothing if there are no actual living workers making stuff.
voxpo,
I believe that the data would show that government takes up roughly
53 cents on every dollar earned.
Life would be a lot more civilized in this country if we
took all that $600 billion we saved by winding down the Pentagon
and spent it on things like making child care and higher education
free to all.
Oh Jesus H Christ wrapped in a shroud. We are so fucking
fucked
doom
DoooM
DOOOOM
I believe that the data would show that government takes up
roughly 53 cents on every dollar earned.
this
website states that in FY2007 (the most recent year they have
full data) says that combined fed, state, and local revenue is
$4.78 trillion dollars. The BEA states
that total personal income is currently around 12 trillion. So even
if you lowball it for 07 at 11 trillion, you'd get about 41-43% of
every dollar earned is collected in taxes. However, the spending is
anywhere from 200 billion to as much as 1 trillion dollars
more.
Kolohe -- spending is ultimately what matters, not the official taxation level, since all that spending will eventually be paid for, one way or the other. The official government statistics, not surprisingly, do not account for the assets confiscated via inflation, which is perhaps the most subtle, or at least most unrecognized, form of taxation levied. Throw in inflation, and the myriad other little levies not accounted for in the government figures, and the spending versus the reported personal income should exceed 50%.
Kolohe,
Prolefeed is correct. Though the professor I had made us use a
different formula for a full exam grade.
for a full exam grade.
Bah! You can get pretty far in life on partial credit.
Child care. You know, like people taking care of your kid
while you work. In places like France, the gov pays for it. My kid
will be supporting you in retirement, even if you think you're
financing it out of your savings. Because your future savings mean
nothing if there are no actual living workers making
stuff.
Mercy, that was an incoherent chain of thought.
Kolohe,
If you're thinking of starting a Kolohe scheme I'm sorry to report
that a guy named Ponzi already came up with it. Though you could
probably still make his business model work.
In places like France, the gov pays for it.
What's your next guess, you blithering pinko?
The government doesn't pay for services, whether in France or
anywhere. The government is an unproductive entity. The
people of France pay for day care, and all the other
things that the French government likes to take credit for.
-jcr
Mercy, that was an incoherent chain of thought.
Yes, it's a sad example of the pervasive mind rot that got us into
this mess.
-jcr
Child care. You know, like people taking care of your kid
while you work. In places like France, the gov
people who have never met your kid
pays for it.
My kid will be supporting you in retirement, even if you think
you're financing it out of your savings.
By the time I retire, there won't be any Soc Sec for the likes of
me, I can assure you, so (except for health care), I will be
financing it out of my savings.
Because your future savings mean nothing if there are no actual
living workers making stuff.
Because your kid will die if he doesn't get state child care.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245