Jesse Walker | October 27, 2008
Call me shallow, but when I read the Thomas Friedman column that Ron Bailey blogged below, I was less interested in the points Friedman was trying to make than in the error in this passage:
They tell you that they have this thing called a "search engine," and they are naming it -- get this -- "Google." They tell you to type in any word in this box on a computer screen and -- get this -- hit a button labeled "I'm Feeling Lucky." Up comes a bunch of Web sites related to that word.
I'm not surprised that Thomas Friedman doesn't know what the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button does. But surely the Times employs copy editors who do?
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Somebody in my office tried to send me an Internet the other day and it just got here today
It's not shallow to take ol' Tommy Friedman to task for one of his many "fact gaffes".
I never use the "I'm feeling Lucky" button, because I'm afraid that Lt. Callahan will shoot me....
I think I'll have to call you shallow. :-) Or maybe I'm not following the point of your post. Why is it worthy of comment that he confused the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button with the "Google Search" button? I think he may have even known the difference but was using artistic license for (slightly) humorous effect.
Actually, now that I've read more of Friedman's columns it's obvious that he was intentionally going for humor.
Taking my post a step further: Clint Eastwoods birthday, they should change the button to read "Are You Feeling Lucky?". The "Punk" would be optional....
Mike: The column certainly attempted to be funny, but I don't see any reason to think the button mixup was part of that.
Read it again substituting "Google Search" everywhere he wrote the phrase "I'm Feeling Lucky". His somewhat humorous scenario now falls completely flat. The reader would think to themselves, "We'll, of course, a search engine would have a Search button."
Sure, the "I'm Feeling Lucky" phrase is funnier. And he could have used it accurately if he changed "Up comes a bunch of Web sites related to that word" to "Up comes a Web site related to that word."
No fan of Tom, here, (seems pretty obvious that his mono obsession with Green is midlife crises in action and Greenspeak is just a means to obtain hot but hairy young tail), but it seems to me he is simplifying things to avoid cluttering his column with asides with both the banking analogy that better describes venture capitalist and the 'I'm feeling lucky' remark.
"And he could have used it accurately if he changed "Up comes a
bunch of Web sites related to that word" to "Up comes a Web site
related to that word.""
Jesse,
You're assuming that some copy editor didn't insert that very error
into Friedman's original.
but it seems to me he is simplifying things to avoid cluttering his column with asides with both the banking analogy that better describes venture capitalist and the 'I'm feeling lucky' remark.
If Friedman didn't have a long track record of coming up with what
he thinks are terribly clever metaphors for "the way the world
works" that turn out to be horribly mistaken because Friedman
doesn't actually know what he's talking about, I might be more
inclined to believe your interpretation.
But Friedman is a proven hack.
But Friedman is a proven hack.
There is that, but when he is one of the few MSM libs saying,
'Wooah, let's put the silverware away and not salivate over plans
to slice up and redistribute the golden goose of the banking
system', I'm less inclined to call him a hack on that particular
occasion.
Taking my post a step further: Clint Eastwoods birthday, they should change the button to read "Are You Feeling Lucky?". The "Punk" would be optional....
"Do you feel lucky?", surely.
I'm not surprised that Thomas Friedman doesn't know what the
"I'm Feeling Lucky" button does. But surely the Times employs copy
editors who do?
Why? To them, Google is a vulgar tool for the hoi polloi. All the
real media types use LexisNexis.
And they say I shouldn't be president because I don't use email! I guess Tom Friedman shouldn't be president either.
"Hot, Flat, and Inaccurate: I prefer Hot, Busty, and
Inaccurate."
"Hon, why are you sucking on that?"
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245