Brian Doherty | September 26, 2008
A little good news in a bad week on the foreign policy front, via the Washington Times:
The House Democratic leadership has effectively shelved a resolution calling for what critics say would amount to a naval blockade of Iran because of concerns that it could provoke another war, officials on Capitol Hill said.
.......
Howard L. Berman, California Democrat and chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said he has concerns about the current text and will not bring it before the committee until those issues are addressed. That, in effect, blocks the document from reaching the floor.
.....
The draft "demands that the president initiate an international effort" that would impose "stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains and cargo entering or departing Iran." It would also ban "the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products."
A version of the proposal will come back around, its backers promise. Well, that's the great thing about starting a war, like suicide: you can always do it later!
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I don't particularly care for this bill, but the concerns about it are somewhat exagerated. It is not quite the straight line from passage to blockade to war to armageddon that its critics have been claiming since it was first introduced.
I have a letter from my congress critter, Nita the ****** Lowey telling me that my concerns are unfounded, that nothing in the proposal amounts to a blockcade or could lead to a war.
It's clobberin time!!! Right after a few minor changes to this bill.
I know Ron Paul has been raising Cain over this bill. I wonder if he finally managed to bring to someone's attention what exactly it is the bill says, that no one seems to have been aware of.
When Xerxes invades with overwhelming force you'll regret not having the blockade!
Are you making a historical reference or a movie
reference?
I'm not telling! Wildcard, bitches! Yee haw!
It would be cool if the Achaemenid dynasty would be restored, along with the worship of Ahura Mazda. I think the U.S. could do business with Iran then.
"Well, that's the great thing about starting a war, like
suicide: you can always do it later!'
That is what Hilter thought when he demanded the sudenland from
Czeckaslovica.
If he invaded for it, the well dug in Czecks would have gutted his
army and reveiled Hitler's true intentions to the world.
So in that vein, let's wait until Iran gets a nuclear bomb, then
the war will be so much easier.
PS: Actually it would be, all we would need to do is launch the
submarine ballistic missiles and wipe out approxiametly 100% of the
Iranian population with few, if any American loses.
"PS: Actually it would be, all we would need to do is launch the
submarine ballistic missiles and wipe out approxiametly 100% of the
Iranian population with few, if any American loses."
And irradiate half of the world in the processes. Brilliant
idea!
And irradiate half of the world in the processes. Brilliant
idea!
Don't misunderstand me here. I an NOT advocating nuking
our Persian adversaries. Is "half of the world" already
"irradiated"?
Nation, # of
Above Ground Nuke Tests, Years, Total Yield
United States 216 1945-1962 153.8 mt
USSR, 214, 1949-1962, 281.6 mt
United Kingdom, 21, 1952-1958, 10.8 mt
France, 46, 1960-1974, 11.4 mt
PRC, 23, 1964-1980, 21.5 mt
South Africa, 1, 1979, 0.003 mt
Humans have conducted hundreds of above ground nuclear tests in
less than 20 years, and except for the giant glowing
crustaceans invading Tonga, the environmental effects have been
fairly minor. Surely we could lay 20 or 30 on Iran without ending
the human race.
Just sayin'.
Terry-
The Czechs certainly would have put up a better fight that the
Poles did, but the idea that they could have actually defeated
Hitler is ludicrous, particularly after Anschluss gave the Wermacht
access to the much weaker defenses along the Czechoslovak-Austrian
border.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245