Brian Doherty | September 18, 2008
Will Wilkinson draws attention to one result of the latest Cato/Fraser Economic Freedom of the World Report: Canada is now ranked as freer than the U.S. of Archie; 7th freest compared to our 8th.
I'm not prepared to argue with their economic calcalations; still, Canada certainly remains a bad place to speak your mind about certain things.
In other Canada freedom news: amazing and celebrated alt-cartoonist Chester Brown is running for parliament as a Libertarian.
Many years back, I wrote an article that generated more hate mail than anything I ever wrote--over 200 emails--for the website suck.com. (Sorry, the late, lamented website Suck.com.) It was a bit of japery mocking Canadian attempts to distinguish themselves from America. I never thought "more freedom" would be one of those distinguishing characteristics.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
First the dollar became worth less than a Loonie, and now this? The end of the world is nigh. What next, their women are hotter than ours?
Sorry, the late, lamented, and blocked by work
website Suck.com
Would someone be kind enough to paste it into the comments
please.
The Cato website shows Canadian economic freedom plateaued and US economic freedom peaked in 2000. I guess the Patriot Act and the post-Enron regulations hurt our score.
LOL, Does Canada accept refugees from the US? It gets much worse
here and I gotta get the heck out. This is getting
ridiculous.
Jiff
www.FireMe.To/udi
Wars of Northern Aggression
Last month, Canada's prime minister Jean Chretien announced that,
what the hell, he's going to call an election over a year before
his term expires. Ostensibly his party's current popularity and
success is why he's chosen now to exert one of the curious (to
Americans) powers a leader in a parliamentary government has. We
wonder if it's just a publicity stunt to remind Americans that,
hey, we Canadians do things a little differently up here.
Canadians feel their very identity and souls embattled by creeping
Americanism. And they are fighting a constant and futile battle to
defend themselves - whoever that may be. With no Dudley Do-Right to
protect the poor Nell that is Canadian culture, the Canadian
government has taken lately to threatening criminal charges against
200,000 confused Canucks who use satellite dishes to watch
contraband US TV programming.
Canada has no satellite TV of its own, and so Canadians hungry for
must-see TV have to use a widespread gray market in dishes, using
bogus US addresses for billing purposes. Canada's "Minister of
Industry" John Manley, bitter that the FCC rejected a plan to let a
Canadian company share satellite space with the American
Tele-Communications, Inc., accused the FCC of having "spurned the
bid as part of a broader US government effort to weaken Canadian
culture." (Yeah, and CIA agents have similarly sabotaged the
careers of Triumph, Margaret Atwood, and the comic strip For Better
or Worse.) Fear of an American planet is such that the satellites
beaming the cultural pollution of trash TV are called "death stars"
by hysterical Canadian nationalists.
The Canadians try their hardestnot to have their culture weakened,
heaven knows. They are proudly culturally nationalistic, enforcing
stringent Canadian content rules on everything from TV to magazines
to pop music, in a desperate attempt to provide some legal
protection for their the-same-only-worse culture when a free market
would wipe out even a pretense of difference.
Those rules enforce complicated formulae for percentage of Canadian
content with varying points of Canadianness awarded for directors,
producers, writers, and performers of programs. For example, if
Canadian Bryan Adams co-writes a song with Brits and records it
with American crew in the Bahamas, the content is only one-forth
Canadian, at least under the "music, artist, production, and
lyrics" system - "MAPL," get it?
Canadians fight with the kind of nationalistic fervor (and they
aren't even afraid of calling it nationalistic) that has made Pat
Buchanan a political pariah. They scrap against the American giant
to protect a culture that, at its most successful, produces such
defiantly distinctive fare as the Porky's saga. Fact is, almost 80
percent of Canadians live within 100 miles of the American border -
they might as well be Americans in fact as well as in cultural
detail. When America indulges in one of its own twinges of us vs.
them nationalism in labeling the domestic vs. foreign content of
autos, it counts Canadian parts manufacturing as if it were
American. The Canadians don't know, but the Americans
understand.
This feud is really about product differentiation when you don't
really have that much to differentiate. Of course, it's an American
tradition, and mostly harmless and fun. Such sundry entertainment
items as sports teams, colas, fast food, and cold cereals all work
by goosing that atavistic instinct to shout "go team!" - humans, as
any grade school kickball game could show you, love to take sides,
especially about things that are otherwise meaningless. Sometimes,
though - as in the occasional kickball game - the side that's
always losing starts to take the game a little too seriously, and
gets really upset, bawls, and ruins the game for everyone. Canada
is the bawling sore-loser of our inter-American cultural kickball
game.
As if we cared. Those of us who don't have to deal with them
generally don't think much of Canadians at all, though a sort of
humorous, we-don't-mean-anything-by-it mock enmity floats up here
and there, now and then. It figures that America's best-known
Canadian stereotype, the MacKenzie Brothers, themselves arose as a
parody of Canada's domestic content laws.
Pollyannas about pointless, meaningless national/ethnic squabbling
like to think that such enmity is based on ignorance - that if only
we all got to know each other and live among each other, we'd
realize we're all the same. My Florida upbringing gave me little
reason to hate Canadians, but when I relocated to a city in upstate
Washington from which I could actually see Canada on a clear day,
things were different.
People hated their awful little coins, cluttering the vending
machines. (Canadians also call their money "dollars," though their
dollar is worth significantly less than ours. Ha.) People hated
their arrogant and unearned sense of difference and superiority to
vulgar Americans. (Even unearned contempt for America and Americans
is a trait the Canadians stole from us.) People hated that the most
powerful radio station's playlist was warped by Canadian content
laws into 4-songs-an-hour doses of the likes of Sass Jordan and
Rush.
What's more, people enjoyed hating them. The one benefit of
Canadians' insistence on their uniqueness is it gives Americans a
reason to bear a mock-xenophobic grudge against someone not even
really xeno. It was fun, it gave you something to talk about, and
it seemed relatively harmless since we knew if it did come to
blows, there's no way we'd lose. As one Canadian scofflaw using
American satellite TV told the Boston Globe, she didn't feel that a
smidgen of Melrose Place every once in a while would make her
succumb "to some strange Yank impulse to invade Cuba or pack a
handgun." But as the kid on the kickball team soon learns, to his
chagrin, one should never show that kind of fear....
Canadians, of course, have many of their own cultural triumphs (or
acts of vengeance) to crow about vis-à-vis the United States. The
two top-selling recording artist of 1996, Alanis Morissette and
Celine Dion, are both native Canadians. Like you could tell.
So what is the difference? Americans know. The difference is, we're
Americans. What Canadians don't seem to understand is that, for all
practical cultural purposes, so are they.
In some ways Canada is freer, in others much less. Overall I would still place the US first. But I guess it depends on how you score it. My main criteria is not the Nolan chart, but how much government affects my daily life. How much does government make its presence known?
The key point of the study is not that the US is less free than
Canada; it is that over the last several years the US freedom
ranking has fallen from 2nd to 8th.
It is only a matter of time until we're invaded by a higher-ranking
country that wants to bless us with the benefits of freedom and
democracy...
Canadians... so sensitive. I recently watched a Canadian
movie
where a guy was committing acts of terrorism over the loss
of Canadian hockey talen to the Americans.
They're so sensitive, up there. If you know what I mean...
Wilkerson mentions wiretaps, are they really part of economic freedom? In what economic areas does Cato say that the US gotten worse?
Just slightly OT, but is there any way someone could change the CSS of suck.com so that the articles are actually presented in a readable format? That would be so awesome.
Brian Doherty, this is gold:
With no Dudley Do-Right to protect the poor Nell that is Canadian culture, the Canadian government has taken lately to threatening criminal charges against 200,000 confused Canucks who use satellite dishes to watch contraband US TV programming.
Jozef,
Where did you dust thqt rant off from? Jean hasn't been around for
a while.
Anyway, love this site. Economically, I would think that we
(Canadians) and the US are on equal standing. I live in Alberta
where we are probably more economicall free than most
Americans.
Other than the egregious abuse of the Human Rights Commisions, my
gut feeling is that we now enjoy far more liberty up here in Canada
than the US. The combination of the abuses of the Bush
administration and your ongoing war on drugs appears looks to an
interested outsider that your society has become much more
authoritarian with a side order of police state.
Here's hope that sites like this will help the US rediscover the
concept of Liberty.
Which reminds me:
Why is the people who most fervently believe in their country's
culture, also believe that it's extremely fragile and thus most apt
to be destroyed and diluted by by foreign invaders?
Mike:
Our war on drugs is also your war on drugs.
You have a slightly higher tolerance for marijuana than we do, but
for everything else? Not so much.
You guys are also going the way of the U.S. on the other extraneous
parts of the drug war: cigarettes and tobacco.
Here's hope that sites like this will help the US rediscover
the concept of Liberty.
I hope too. But I'm not putting my bets on a positive outcome.
Oh, and mike, Jozef appears to have reprinted the entire suck.com article. Why, I have no idea. The link was in the OP.
Mike and Paul,
Per Warren's request up-thread, Jozef copied and pasted Brian's
"rant" for all to see.
Why is the people who most fervently believe in their
country's culture, also believe that it's extremely fragile and
thus most apt to be destroyed and diluted by by foreign
invaders?
Somebody said the same thing the other day about religion. It's a
good point both times.
Missed Warren's request. Thanks. What's up, Warren, those pesky IT guys got you blocked? I have a solution for that, if you do.
Kolohe,
Really? Wow, the religion angle is an even better point. The more
omnipotent the god and the faith, the more fragile it is. Wish I'd
have thought of it...
I just don't get it. I remember all of the intellecutal lefties
hand-wringing over the failty of communism, grousing that communism
failed because it was encircled by capitalists. Never occurred to
them that communism was supposed to thrive in spite of... nay,
because of capitalism.
It's a little tough to type this while I'm giving myself a big "I'm so free!!!" hug here in Vancouver BC Canada ;>) - and you know, we don't even have Freedom Fries!
Far as economics, I'd be willing to believe that. Our country
seems to be going down the shitter capitalism-wise, and Switzerland
seems to have done a much better job in that department with
basically the same constitution. They also seem to have a much more
gridlocked government and a relatively powerless president.
Canada's government film funding body - Telefilm Canada or some
such thing, because the new guys in charge are social
conservatives, is now refusing to fund projects that aren't
approved by a board for moral fortitude (Cronenberg is pissed). It
seems in this area, as we learned with the Elephant Poop BVM a few
years back in New York, you cannot have your government subsidized
cake and eat it too.
is now refusing to fund projects that aren't approved by a
board for moral fortitude (Cronenberg is pissed)
Cronenberg is still receiving government money?!? Or is he just
pissed on principle. If so, that's cool. While I disapprove of
government funding of movies, I have to give the Canadians credit
for giving it to "The Baron of Blood".
It's a little tough to type this while I'm giving myself a
big "I'm so free!!!" hug here in Vancouver BC Canada ;>) - and
you know, we don't even have Freedom Fries!
We'll see how "free" you feel after Operation Arctic Storm, you
maple sucking puck slapper. Canuckistan will fall like AIG stock
prices.
That Suck.com article was pretty funny. I assume your hate mail was from Canadians who were just shocked and outraged that a Yank could question their superiority.
What a day for the server to go down at work! I missed all the
Canadian fun.
What next, their women are hotter than ours?
You're not seriously asking that question, are you? I really can't
speak for the rest of Canada, but women from Vancouver are hotter
than most. Vancouver's own Lululemon makes pants that are
ass-tastic and ubiquitous. Plus, we've established that we're
obviously cylons, which is superhot.
Considering all the above, is freedom really that
important?
Shut your fucking face, unclefucker! You're a cocksucking, asslicking unclefucker.
Vancouver's own Lululemon makes pants that are ass-tastic
and ubiquitous
Yoga clothing? You must be able to do better than that.
Considering all the above, is freedom really that
important?
It depends on how good the sex is.
what the hell, he's going to call an election over a year
before his term expires
The wackiness of Canadian politics is put into even sharper
perspective for me since I moved to the US. Canadian senators
aren't elected, they're appointed. The PM can call an election any
time he damn well pleases. Members of Parliament always
vote along party lines, and can be kicked out of the party if they
dissent. The election is in less than a month, and I still don't
know who's running in my (parents') riding. Once I do find out,
I'll have to write it in on a zany looking, anachronistic piece of
carbon paper!
My dad keeps bragging to me about budget surpluses, but when I
visit and scan the Jobs section of the Vancouver Sun, the
majority of listings are for gov't positions, and the ones that
aren't are related to some form of resource extraction (a field not
especially interesting to this city-loving chick).
Nowhere is perfect, is the point, and it's silly when people on
both sides of the border villify each other instead of learning
from each other.
/end rant
Yoga clothing? You must be able to do better than
that.
You haven't seen their clothes, I take it. Or maybe you just
haven't seen them on ridiculously good looking Vancouver girls.
Guys tend to go a little nuts. But competition for men is crazy
there, because of the over-supply of hot women. Really makes you
keep up your game. (Which is actually more fun. Here in Seattle
it's too easy, with all your chubby American girls lowering the
curve.)
It depends on how good the sex is.
Naturally. Looks only go so far.
"I'm gonna throw on a skirt, take off my underwear, and make your
pop-pop proud."
I haven't paid attention in a long time, but back in the 80's,
Chester Brown was a pretty fricken great, albeit deranged,
cartoonist.
I'm happy to find out he's libertarian!!!
Wilkerson mentions wiretaps, are they really part of
economic freedom? In what economic areas does Cato say that the US
gotten worse?
Wiretaps aren't part of a libertarian utopia, but they're pretty
useful when you're fighting a world war against fascist terrorism.
Economic freedom is what's really important, and it's sliding
backward, thanks to mass liberal hysteria and Pelosi and pals. I
might have to move to Canada, too, if we end up in Obamastan.
Canadian employers have much more freedom to control their
employees, but that is because the employees are all
immigrants.
Canadian police have more legal right to wrongfully search and
seize and harrass you, but you are much more likely to be
wrongfully searched and seized and harrassed by police in
America.
"I might have to move to Canada, too, if we end up in
Obamastan."
Many people *promise* to move to Canada if their guy loses, but few
seem to actually go through with it. At least you said "might,"
leaving yourself some wiggle room.
Dagny,
I'm from Montreal originally (now living in south Florida) and I'll
put a general sampling of our girls up against Vancouver's any
time. But I'm sure you're quite lovely.
In a Canadian way, it might be like comparing South Beach and
LA.
"Once I do find out, I'll have to write it in on a zany looking,
anachronistic piece of carbon paper!"
Well I would never trust your stupid voting machines and computers
- A paper trail every time thanks.
jean chretien??? really??? that was two PMs ago. chretien retired several years ago and was replaced by lib paul martin, who lost the subsequent election to prog/con stephen harper, who has now called new elections.
It's a little tough to type this while I'm giving myself a
big "I'm so free!!!" hug here in Vancouver BC Canada
;>)
Well, hug away, as long as you aren't the proprietor of website
that allows comments, or would care to post comments critical of a
certain Peaceful Religion. Unlike the US, Canada has actual thought
police.
At least the Canadian government believes in the protection of
the individual from most pre-employment war on some drugs
testing.
The Canadian Human Rights Commission ruled in July 2002 that
workplace drug testing was a violation of citizens' civil rights
except for impairment testing in safety-sensitive positions. Canada
now has some of the strongest protections against workplace drug
testing in the world. "Employers, with very, very few exceptions,
should not be testing employees, or candidates for employment, for
drugs." Commission Issues Revised Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy,
July 10, 2002
Now I'm voting for Obama just to show that Miller is bullshitting and will NOT move to Canada as promised.
@TrickyVic:
If you're an Obama supporter, I'm sure you've heard of
"hyperbole."
Isn't it past your bedtime?
I did the State of
World Liberty index a few years ago. The index was based on
data from several think tank studies, including Cato's economic
freedom index. Canada ranked as the third most libertarian country
in the world after Estonia and Ireland, and a tiny edge ahead of
Switzerland. US was #8.
1 Estonia - 85.25
2 Ireland - 83.34
3 Canada - 82.34
4 Switzerland - 82.33
5 Iceland - 82.27
6 Bahamas - 82.12
7 United Kingdom - 81.96
8 United States - 81.96
9 Cyprus - 81.65
10 New Zealand - 81.24
The survey did not include many of the tax shelter island countries
that would likely have ranked highly due to lack of info. North
Korea was at the bottom (unsurprisingly.) I'm going to retool a bit
for the next one (hopefully later this year) because the "personal
freedom" category was based on Freedom House, which isn't
incredibly informative (US was among many countries to get 5/5 that
year...)
When you dig into the numbers and track back the sources on this
one, Canada's higher score is basically the result of the
following:
- When asked in international surveys, Canadians feel they have
more judicial independence and impartial courts than do
Americans.
- Government investment as a share of total investment is about 4%
higher in the US than Canada.
- The military is more involved with politics in the US, according
to the PRS Group.
- Americans break the law more than Canadians.
- The US has more agricultural price controls than Canada.
- Surveyed American businesspeople report having to make more
bribes and off-the-books payments to get things done.
- Tax compliance costs more in the US.
In all other facets, the US and Canada were either closely ranked,
or the US had a large advantage. Due to the scoring formulae,
however, the above issues caused Canada to be ranked higher.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245