Ronald Bailey | September 17, 2008
Creationism is not just for certain fundamentalist Christians anymore. Monsters and Critics is reporting:
Turkish internet users have been blocked via a court order from accessing the site of prominent British biologist Richard Dawkins after complaints from lawyers for Islamic creationist author Adnan Oktar, the website of Turkish television station NTV reported on Wednesday.
A court in Istanbul ordered that Turk Telekom block access to the site and since the weekend Turkish internet users seeking the site have been redirected to a page that says in Turkish 'access to this site has been suspended in accordance with a court decision'.
NTV reported that Oktar complained he and his creationist book 'Atlas of Creation' had been defamed by comments made by Dawkins on the site.
'I am at a loss to reconcile the expensive and glossy production values of this book with the breathtaking inanity of the content,' Dawkins, a distinguished advocate of the theory of evolution, wrote on his website in July referring to the Atlas of Creation.
The book has caused controversy not just through its advocation of creationism but also through how thousands of copies of book were distributed to schools in a number of European countries.
Thank whatever deity (or none) for the First Amendment which
protects both free speech and religious practice.
Hat tip to Eric Jon Magnuson.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Well, his site is a little too busy. Maybe ban it until he springs for some real web design.
BTW, our embassy in Yemen was attacked. I guess all those people who said "we haven't had an attack on our soil since 9/11" and counted the 1998 embassy attacks as "American soil" can STFU now.
I see they don't want to join the EU anytime soon,
then.
I dunno, the EU is not that big on protecting the rights
of expression.
Anybody who denies the fact of evolution is a
moron, purposely ignorant or a liar. I'm looking at you Pat
Robertson. You've more in common with the fundie Islam clerics than
you know.
Was it a Sharia court?
Actually, off the top of my head I would say that Turkey is one of
the freest, most secularly governed countries with an Islamic
majority. And they're still too gutless to allow a little
criticism.
I see they don't want to join the EU post
Renaissance world anytime soon, then.
Well. in the industrialised world, or what ever the criteria,
Turkey was the only nation that doubted evolution more than the
United States.
This might also be overturned. Remember Elif Safak? Her novel
brought charges of "insulting Turkiness", and we all hear about
that, but few knew the charges were eventually dismissed.
Adnan Oktar is a darling of the American creationists. Read up on
him. I'm sure the American nutbars are jealous.
I do think that Oktar use his "turkishness" and "libel" for his
successes in getting parts of the internet blocked.
Thank whatever deity (or none) all those
dead white men of European descent for the First Amendment
which protects both free speech and religious practice.
I am extremely grateful the first ammendment prevents such bans in the US. I hope Dawkins' experience inspires him to reform UK libel laws.
If I had to guess, I would hypothesize that the Turkish court
was not so much endorsing creationism as smacking down an Arrogant
Westerner (TM) who dared insult a Turk.
Incidentally, I noticed this in the linked article:
"In May, Oktar was found guilty of creating an illegal organization
for personal gain and sentenced to three years imprisonment. He is
appealing the decision."
It seems like Turkish law has a few repressive tendencies.
kinnath | September 17, 2008, 11:54am | #
Thankwhatever deity (or none)all those dead white men of European descent for the First Amendment which protects both free speech and religious practice.
Let us also be grateful for John Locke's "A Letter Concerning
Toleration" and the source text he quoted for inspiring said dead
white men to write the 1st ammendment.
For Oktar's sake, let us hope that the Turkish prison system has *evolved* since the movie Midnight Express.
BTW, our embassy in Yemen was attacked. I guess all those
people who said "we haven't had an attack on our soil since 9/11"
and counted the 1998 embassy attacks as "American soil" can STFU
now.
What people would those be? Oh yeah, the ones in your head.
Mad max, you need to read up on the charges Oktar was convicted
on.
Here's one link.
http://www.mukto-mona.com/debunk/harun_yahya/index.htm
Capelza,
Interesting link. If these things are true, he would seem to
deserve a prison sentence.
From the link:
"He and his followers claimed that they had only engaged in 'anal
and oral' sex. They preferred this kinds of sexual intercourse
since according to Koran, he claimed, these acts are not
impermissible outside of marriage."
Then I guess he'd fit right in at any prison, especially a Turkish
one.
(That's the last Turkish prison joke, I promise, unless I think of
a new one).
I'm not sure how many people realize that Saudi Arabia is
actually the principal exporter of creationism. They have been
publishing creationist books (some very expensive, with leather
binding, gold leaf, glossy pages, etc) and sending them here free
of charge for some time.
For the xenophilic leftists who run Western schools, throwing away
such a book is problematic in a way it wouldn't be if the authors
were Christian.
Doesn't help that Dawkins is, you know, a giant fucking asshole, even if he's (probably) right.
And, of course, these blocks are trivial to get around. This is
a page on getting around a similar YouTube block, but they should
work for arbitrary sites.
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/03/howto_evade_tur.html
Who was that National Review writer who put out a book about the need for an alliance between Islamic fundies and American conservatives?
"Who was that National Review writer who put out a book about
the need for an alliance between Islamic fundies and American
conservatives?"
They already have an alliance. They just don't realize it.
Sounds like something D'Souza would write. he hates secularism
like religious people hate secularism.
Also, I don't think dawkins is "a giant fucking asshole". He wrote
a book, and goes on shows sometimes to try to make religious people
look stupid (which isn't very hard). Let's be honest, when you're
not only right, but surrounded by people who are very stubbornly
wrong, your dickishness will come out a lot easier.
The most dickish thing i've ever heard him say was to a college
audience that included some people from a conservative Christian
school that claimed to have dinosaur fossils that were a few
thousand years old. He told them to "enroll in a real university".
Wow, what a prick.
"Doesn't help that Dawkins is, you know, a giant fucking
asshole, even if he's (probably) right."
I can certainly understand that criticism because I believe that
his style doesn't necessarily work in every situation.
However, I also feel that it's time that we stop pussy footing
around on the issue, and begin marginalizing such beliefs in the
public sphere.
When dealing with such sly tactics that Creationist supporters have
formulated, you soon realize that you must speak boldly in a
language that they understand, or let them forever influence
mainstream opinion.
It's a constant problem when dealing with irrational people in any
context. They play by a different set of rules, built around
visceral responses, not rational discourse.
Are you kidding?
You guess Turkey doesn't want to join the EU? Granted, the banning
of this site is completely absurd, and I've never heard of anything
like this happening in Turkey.
However, the only real freedom of speech limits in Turkey previous
to this absurdity were for "insulting Turkishness". Obviously, a
broad category for limiting speech, and one that needs to go. But
it's use has not been very frequent, although that's a relative
term -- once is too much.
However, before you castigate Turkey, remember that European
countries have similarly outrageous policies, if in all cases less
broad. Consider France, which, relevant to the topic of Turkey, has
made it a crime to dispute the characterization of the plight of
the Armenians following the rebellion of many of their brethren who
defected to the side of Russia in WW1 (as well as the plight of the
Armenians who died in pogroms following terrorist attacks by
Armenians on Turks). This is an absurd law since many very
qualified academics such as Lewis and Mango dispute the
characterization. (Read Mango's New York Times book review of the
atrocious piece of attempted history called "The Burning Tigris" by
Peter Balakian.)
I think Turkey will fix this soon, but this is truly an absurdity.
Creationism has very little (make that zero) ground among the
secular elite that control the government and the higher
courts.
And for Mad Max, prisons everywhere are awful. Turkey is quite a
modern country, in general. You can thank the US and Western Europe
for the horrible drug laws that have been imported to all parts of
the world.
There's plenty of people in jail with much longer sentences than
the escapee would've served in Turkey who had the same amount of
hashish in America. Life sentences, etc. And there are
"gay-for-the-stay"'s galore in the prison's of the world, no more
and no less in any particular country.
I don't understand why the Turkish are so upset with the genial host of Family Feud.
Thank
whatever deity (or none)all those dead white men of European descent for the First Amendment which protects both free speech and religious practice.
Well, at least until Bernanke gets his little paws on it. Surely
the Fed will want to bailout the Constitution soon. It's just as
bankrupt (without remaining value) as the rest.
I don't understand why the Turkish are so upset with the
genial host of Family Feud.
Dude, have you seen The Running Man? That guy's cold, man.
I think he killed Mick Fleetwood with his bare hands. Although as
the 1992 Clinton campaign showed, that was probably a good
thing.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245