reason.tv's Dan Hayes went backstage at the Ron Paul Rally for Liberty to talk with attendees about what motivates them to follow the Texas congressman. (Hint: It's not Jesse Ventura's 9/11 theories.)
Nick Gillespie | September 4, 2008
reason.tv's Dan Hayes went backstage at the Ron Paul Rally for Liberty to talk with attendees about what motivates them to follow the Texas congressman. (Hint: It's not Jesse Ventura's 9/11 theories.)
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
texas_libertarian|9.4.08 @ 10:30AM|#
That was awesome. Those two little kids would make better presidents than McCain or Obama.
shecky|9.4.08 @ 11:13AM|#
Who'da thunk coonskin caps would work so well as a Ron Paul themed event?
|9.4.08 @ 11:16AM|#
All good libertarians wear a funny hat at gatherings.
Bingo|9.4.08 @ 12:23PM|#
Tin foil being the most popular of all at Ron Paul events...
|9.4.08 @ 3:12PM|#
I am really impressed with B.J. Lawson. I hope he makes it into Congress and eventually has the opportunity to run for high office. He may have to start going by William though. Yes, I think Fellatio jokes are that important.
The Wine Commonsewer|9.4.08 @ 3:33PM|#
All good libertarians wear a funny hat at gatherings
As a rule, they're tinfoil.
So Dan, where's the up close and personal of Sara Evans? ;-)
|9.4.08 @ 5:37PM|#
I never got the Paul songs a bit too much for me. Sadly it looks like the end, thanks truthers. The "movement" is not even that old and they need a purge already...LOL.
jj|9.4.08 @ 7:19PM|#
Is "tin foil" used metaphorically, or is it simply your best slur of those with whom you disagree?