Damon W. Root | August 28, 2008
Did Barack Obama just endorse Justice Scalia's majority opionion in D.C. v. Heller? The opinion did specify that longstanding bans on "unusual" guns won't be affected.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
The "hands of criminals" part gives him wiggle room, but somehow I doubt that he'll use it.
Since when is a .30 cal semi-automatic rifle unusual? We have
been using them since the 40's...
Also, all of Obama's former firearms positions, statements, and
votes have been about keeping arms out of the hands of criminals by
restricting access for the law-abiding. Let's not forget allowing
frivolous lawsuits against the manufactures and shutting down all
gun shops within a 5 mi radius of a school...
And we all know how well gun control has worked in black neighborhoods in Chicago, Sen. Obama. Just ask all the honor students shot dead by gang bangers since you've been in the Senate ...
What is it with Libertarians? You seem to have wanted Scalia to
list exactly what guns and calibers were protected by the right. Be
happy with what the decision covers, which probably would include
AK 47s for law abiding people.
Beyond that, as a conservative person, I don't want criminals
(known felons) having any guns let alone AK 47s.
Obama: Hey, I got an idea! Let's pass a law banning criminals
from owning AK-47s!
Criminal: Sounds great. That'll drive up the prices of guns on the
black market. I can use the profits to fund my criminal enterprises
while still being able to easily get whatever guns I desire.
Criminals 4 Obama, yo!
Unusual nothing. The fully automatic AK-47 is the most ubiquitous firearm on the planet.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245