David Weigel | July 2, 2008
My friend Brian Beutler, a liberal blogger and journo who's been reporting the hell out of the torture and FISA stories, is in the hospital recovering from a mugging in my Washington, D.C. neighborhood. A disturbed man demanded his cell phone, then shot him three times, twice in the stomach, once in the shoulder.
It's been something, watching this unfold over gchat and e-mail. The weird fraternity of young writers in D.C. has been profiled and mocked far more often than makes sense from a public interest perspctive. But as soon as we learned about this, everybody who knew Brian acted like... well, humans. Several of us (not me, yet) traveled to the hospital to donate blood. Collaboration began on a lengthy list of "Brian Beutler Facts," inspired by the (now surely played out) list of oddball stories of Chuck Norris. Sample entries: "Lance Armstrong wears a Brian Beutler bracelet." "The active ingredient in Levitra is Brian Beutler." "Meatloaf would do that for Brian Beutler."
Appreciations are also coming from reasonoid Julian Sanchez and occasional contributor Megan McArdle, who brings the sociological science:
When DC does try to "do something", it's something stupid and quasi-fascist like locking down neighborhoods instead of putting more cops on the beat and using the advanced police tactics that are now the norm in every other city. From what I know, Fenty seems like a better mayor than DC's previous disasters, but the city government remains corrupt and incompetent. No one should have to spend their lives feeling this afraid.
Largely, I agree with Sanchez that this is a better time to wish Beutler well and raise a glass to his relative good luck (he's lost his spleen but will otherwise recover completely) than to launch into a debate on Heller.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
That would be a cool nickname. 30 cent just walked into the bar . . . 30 cent is late . . . that would be bitchin'! Hope your friend doesn't let his mugging get him down.
raise a glass to his relative good luck (he's lost his spleen but will otherwise recover completely) than to launch into a debate on Heller.
Tempting, though it is.
The question is, can he resume his career as a blogger
without his spleen?
I would think so. I believe the spleen is like the appendix, it's
only useful for those who graze in meadows.
Happy Jack,
I thought the spleen was important for digestion purposes. Damn,
A&P classes!!!
He may still blog but we all what happens to a liberal who gets
mugged.
Nevertheless, I wish him well.
My apologies Happy Jack. It's the geek in me that ruins moments. Sigh . . .
Congratulations commenters for not getting involved in a totally inappropriate discussion of Heller. The thread at TPM did not seem to go as well.
What kind of cellphone did he have and does he still have
it?
Probably not one of these
phones.
I betcha it was an iPhone.
In which case Brian might have been shot for telling the mugger
"Why are you mugging me, moron, the new iPhones are coming out soon
and this will be worthless?!?"
Without getting into the Heller thing: have any of his philosophical views changed as a result of this incident?
Since I don't know the guy, I don't feel much in guilt in wondering about liberal blogger Brian's views on gun control. What law would he propose to prevent the crime that happened to him? 90 day waiting period? Fingerprints, retina scan, and semen sample? Banning anything powerful enough to kill squirrel with only two shots? Armored troops at the border of DC to prevent guns from even entering the city? He long until he goes all British on us and starts advocating the banishment of steak knives?
Since some of us do know the guy, how about you file those clever questions away for a little while?
Since some of us do know the guy, how about you file those
clever questions away for a little while?
Julian-Perhaps a discussion would be in order as to why, if one
runs into circumstances which a particular law or political
position could have dramatically affected, it is somehow improper
to engage in any discussion of it based on someone knowing the
person.
If I were to know, for example, Officer Jarrod Shivers, would that
preclude discussion of no knock raids and the possible corruption
of the Chesapeake PD? I would hope not. If I knew the man, I might
choose to abstain from discussions personally, but that shouldn't
necessarily preclude others.
What you're essentially saying is "I know the guy so don't comment
on his politics in regards to his current situation", which in turn
begs the question "If you didn't know him, would that be ok?", or
"Is there any situation, since someone someplace knows the
individual...". How about Spitzer's situation? Someone someplace
cared about the guy, does that preclude discussion on him being
arrested for the same crime he pursued others for? Obviously, these
are intended as rhetorical so no need to brand them as "clever
questions".
That said, Heller doesn't have a bit to do with what happened to
this particular individual, so it's inappropriate in that regard
(though the fact that the ban still stands might allow for some
discussion in regards to its effeciveness), so don't think I'm
trying to stir up a discussion on it.
I'm just curious as to the justification of using personal
knowledge of someone to preclude discussion by the general public
of that person's public record, and I'm not liking the logical
extrapolation of that line of thought as it applies to public
discussion.
it's kinda pathetic that it took one of their friends geting shot to make them rush to to the hospital to donate blood. really speaks to the humanitarian impulses of young washington writers
This is not really all that complicated, nor is it a dire threat to all public discourse: I'm just saying maybe a "best wishes to our friend" post right after the fact is not the appropriate time and place to go snarking on someone's political views. But neither do I feel like having an etiquette argument here, so hey, a suggestion; take it or leave it.
Gotta wonder what devil bones are buried there in the DC swamps
that makes this kind of thing at best unsurprising to anyone who's
lived in the DC area.
I wish him the best but as for DC, screw it, that place needs an
exorcism.
Here's to his recovery, and here's to his mugger dying of tertiary drug-resistant syphilis soon.
This is not really all that complicated, nor is it a dire
threat to all public discourse: I'm just saying maybe a "best
wishes to our friend" post right after the fact is not the
appropriate time and place to go snarking on someone's political
views.
I would say that "it depends". If the guy was a staunch supporter
of the DC ban, and the firearm was banned, pointing that out hoping
that he'd realize the extent to which his ban isn't working is one
thing. Taking pleasure in someone getting shot is something else
entirely. I would still submit that this is applicable whether or
not you know the guy, which is what first raised my eyebrows as I
thought you were advocating a different standard based on knowing
someone than not.
But neither do I feel like having an etiquette argument here,
so hey, a suggestion; take it or leave it.
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
I'm glad for his sake that he is on the way to recovery,
unfortunately there are a lot in his situation that don't make
it.
[url=http://www.credit518.com]Ugg Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com]Abercrombie & Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com]nike jordan[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/pick_out.php]nike jordan[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/category.php?id=124]nike
jordan[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/category.php?id=4]nike
jordan[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/category.php?id=36]nike
jordan[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/category.php?id=53]nike
jordan[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/category.php?id=11]Abercrombie &
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/category.php?id=58]Abercrombie &
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/category.php?id=59]Abercrombie &
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/category.php?id=11]Abercrombie &
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/brand.php?id=10]Abercrombie &
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/goods.php?id=451]Abercrombie &
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/category.php?id=5]Ugg
Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/goods.php?id=91]Ugg Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/goods.php?id=89]Ugg Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/goods.php?id=90]Ugg Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/goods.php?id=69]Ugg Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/goods.php?id=68]Ugg Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.credit518.com/goods.php?id=66]Ugg Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/ugg-boots-chocolate-classic-short-24-cm-womens-shoes.html]Ugg
Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/ugg-boots-beige-classic-tall-32-cm-chestnut-womens.html]Ugg
Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/ugg-boots-black-classic-tall-32-cm-women-shoes.html]Ugg
Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/ugg-boots-5854-sheepskin-ugg-classic-mini-chocolate-1.html]Ugg
Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com]Ugg Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/abercrombie-fitch.html]Ugg
Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/a-f-male-female-sandals.html]Ugg
Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/ugg-boots.html]Ugg Boots[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/abercrombie-fitch-women-wear_abercrombie-fitch-women-coat.html]Abercrombie
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/abercrombie-fitch-a-f-men-s-polo-shirt170240.html]Abercrombie
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/abercrombie-fitch-bag.html]Abercrombie
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/Abercrombie Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/abercrombie-fitch-men-s-wear.html]Abercrombie
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/a-f-male-female-sandals.html]Abercrombie
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/a-f-bracelet-and-necklace.html]Abercrombie
Fitch[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com/nike-shoes_nike-sb-dunk.html]nike sb
dunk[/url]
[url=http://www.sell777.com]nike sb dunk [/url]
I have a theory that the bizarre foreign spam on this site is a
part of some sort of subversive anti-globalization agenda.
Either that or I don't know WTF.
too soon? asked . . . can he resume his career as a blogger
without his spleen?
...........................................
I have been without my spleen since 1952, and it hasn't affected my
writing, yet.
One does have to look after one's liver, and take more precautions
against infections, but the spleen has little effect upon one's
cognitive, investigative, or communications skills.
In addition, its loss creates a slimmer waistline.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245