July 1, 2008
Over at the New York Times, Senior Editor Kerry Howley talks with The Cato Institute's Will Wilkinson about how geriatric voters are ruining American politics. Click on the image below to watch.
To watch the rest of their conversation, visit Bloggingheads.tv.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
[grumpy old guy voice]
Distort? Distort you say? I will tell you about distortion! Back in
my day we did not even have 'politics' and we were greatful! We
didn't even have food. All we had was dirt. Dirt without politics
and we were happy happy happy.
Then you little whippersnappers come along with your politics
trying to tell us what to do with your money. Distortion
my hiney! It is our right!
Now, get off my yard before I have to shoot the water hose on
you!
Darn old people, always running around voting, telling me to get
off their lawn, trying to get elected President and such.
Oddly enough, at one point I was invited to join AARP, despite
being about 30 and not retired. Mailing lists are weird things.
What's in Kerry's hand, a shotglass of vodka?
I don't blame her, I too need a drink when I think about old folks
and politics!
Those damned socialist old people!
How dare they preserve their investment in Social Security!
I of course won't WTFV because I am at work, but I'm sure I'd
agree with anything that resembles "boomers suck".
Also, can't reason find people for certain employees to
echo-chamber with that they aren't currently playing hide
the salami with? It sort of puts a damper on the whole
"objectivity" thing.
You know your old when your talking to your friends and they
say:
How young Tim Russert was when he died
How young George Carlin was when he died
and 80 is the new 50.
I of course won't WTFV because I am at work
Me too and I am trying to save the taxpayers bandwidth
charges.
I am so nice that way.
Art,
She is a hottie in that pic. Sort of has that "drinks well with
others" look.
Me too and I am trying to save the taxpayers bandwidth charges.
I am so nice that way.
Not only that, but through your brave efforts, reason.com won't end up on the DoD filtered websites list. Hooray!
Q: How did a generation of hippies turn into landed gentry that
makes laws against anything new?
A: They got old, to everyone's surprise.
Art,
I thought I got it filtered right before I made the FIRST POST this
thread, but it must have just been the server squirrels.
She is a hottie in that pic. Sort of has that "drinks well with others" look.
She seems like the kind of woman who'd turn a fellow down all
polite-like. And, yeah, I'd say she's about early-'90s Winona Ryder
hot. I'm gonna be real honest and say I couldn't pay attention to
Will Wilkinson because Ms. Howley was just too
dime-a-licious.*
*I'm truly, truly sorry.
Damn, that Will guy is as hairy as I am.
Good for you Mr. Wilkinson. We ape-men have to stick together
against the metrosexual threat.
I thought I got it filtered right before I made the FIRST POST this thread, but it must have just been the server squirrels.
:::whew::: :)
jtuf,
good one.
Art,
I think her mom was one of the female vocalists in the Human
League.
Hmm, was that supposed to be a debate? What was the point again? That old people vote? Sorry, but I didn't hear any actual facts presented, more of a "I'm scared that old people won't let gays get married" sort of vibe.
I think her mom was one of the female vocalists in the Human League.
Some cursory research suggests that this is apocryphal. However, were such a thing true, she would become an uber-legend.
How do old people distort politics?
"Poking the thingy into the wrong slot on the ballot" comes to
mind.
Indeed. If it weren't for old people voting for Buchanan, we'd all have forgotten about global warming by now.
Neon Cat, I think I can top your AARP recruitment tale. When I was about 17, I received an invitation to join. To be fair though, my grandfather had the same name as I do, and (I think this is where the problem came from) I had a subscription to Smithsonian magazine from my grandmother.
Good grief people -- the problem is not with OLD people
"distorting" politics, the problem is with PEOPLE distoring
politics.
What the frack is 'undistorted' politicis, anyway?
Worst Reason post in at least weeks...
no hugs for thugs, old or young,
Shirley Knott
Old people vote, so what? Young people don't vote, too fucking bad.
I want to be a part of a coddled, voting coalition. You libs that refuse to vote are screwing things up for the rest of us ;-)
STFU you punk kids. AND GET OFF MY LAWN *shakes fist*
I'm talking to you Kerry. I'm going to curse you for disparaging
the elderly. Are you listending?
One day, if you are vary lucky, IT WILL HAPPEN TO YOU!
What the frack is 'undistorted' politicis,
anyway?
Doing EXACTLY as I say!
Am I the only one who gets a little twinge of disappointment
upon realizing that an interesting blog topic is being presented in
video form only? I'm just too restless (and short of time) to sit
and soak up the nuts and bolts of an argument at the mercy of
someone else's pace and tempo.
Or maybe I'm the old fuddy-duddy. Those dang newfangled
web clips...
[grumpy old guy voice]
Back in my day if we wanted to see moving pictures we would just go
out on the porch and look at the dinosaurs play.
Later we would go to the picture shows.
Everything went down hill when those infernal "talkies" started
taking over.
Leave me alone while I listen to the wireless!
"I just realized Ms. Howley and Mr. Wilkinson comb their hair in
the same way."
That's because they're both girls. Seriously, old people are yucky!
They're wrinkly, and they smell bad. Plus, they totally can't get
it up (this is the guys).
I guess the moral is that
1) Will and Kerry need to bang out as many kids as possible, so as
to make society more progressive
2) kill themselves when they hit 50
I'm with Tom; Kerry is very good looking, but I'd much rather read than watch TV. Especially since these things always stutter on my computer.
How do old people distort politics?
"Poking the thingy into the wrong slot on the ballot" comes to
mind.
Not to mention a "trying to prevent men from poking their thingy
into wrong slots (sluts?)" vibe .
Preventing "Social Progress"?! To anyone harboring any further
doubt cosmotarians are basically socialists that have learned to
talk in market-speak, I rest my case....
nd, yeah, I'd say she's about early-'90s Winona Ryder
hot.
Heh, yeah.... the Cutest li'l Commie from Cato....
The external speakers on my laptop are toast, so it's just too
damn much trouble to go get the headphones to watch someone only
quasi-hot like Kerry talk.
Sorry, Kerry, but the creepy droolfest here is getting on my
nerves.
Seriously, you libertarians act like you've never seen a girl
before.
Wait for it...
Seriously, you libertarians act like you've never seen a
girl before.
bad sci fi novels are a harsh mistress, joe.
thank you thank you i'll be here all week picking the lowest
hanging fruit i can find.
piggie, don't you think it kinda fucks up specificity when you use
the term "socialist" as a replacement for "people i don't care
for"? though it must be neat to yell "you fucking socialist!" at
the dude who cuts you off when driving to the store.
"damn statist assholes! learn how to drive, commie pukes!"
I believe joe--what is it you kids say these days?--oh yeah, "wins the thread"..
piggie, don't you think it kinda fucks up specificity when
you use the term "socialist" as a replacement for "people i don't
care for"?
No, I don't think so. Socialism isn't merely about forced wealth
re-distribution, it's about forced wealth re-distribution to
achieve specific ends. I don't see how a (slight) modification of
policy to achieve redistribution in pursuit of those same ends
distinguishes it from the classic model in any significant
manner.
I like Will's frames.
I'm also amused at the notion of Will and Kerry doing each other's
hair prior to engaging in their video debate.
Why is kerry bright pink? Is it my monitor? Will is sort of
normal white prson pink, but kerry looks a bit like the girl in
willie wonka who ate a meal-in-a-gum.
but pink.
mitch: Kerry is very good looking, but I'd
much rather read than watch TV. Especially since these things
always stutter on my computer.
Ubuntu, my friend. Ubuntu is the answer. Take the red pill.
I don't see how a (slight) modification of policy to achieve
redistribution in pursuit of those same ends distinguishes it from
the classic model in any significant manner.
maybe i'm missing the point, but i don't see the cosmotarian
handout system in place. perhaps latte foam is clouding my vision,
but i don't think so. at the very least, i didn't take kerry's
one-liner about social progress - intended, i believe, to mean the
natural evolution of a place, changing demographics, etc - as a
gotcha moment.
Grow up on three news channels and you would be a blithering
idiot too.
Grow all the TV channels we have today you would be a blithering
idiot too.
Turn off the TV and you might become depressed because you'd find
yourself surrounded by so many blithering idiots.
The internet is the new printing press, we'll see how long they'll
let that stand.
someone only quasi-hot
I see you, contrarian, ha ha. Maybe there should be disclaimers at the bottom of Kerry Howley threads, warning the unsuspecting of the crypto-sexist admiration that will follow.
dhex,
People who don't realize that everything was better in 1952 are teh
socialist.
Over at the New York Times, Senior Editor Kerry Howley talks
with The Cato Institute's Will Wilkinson about how geriatric voters
are ruining American politics.
But wait, both of them have told us that demographic changes are
nothing to worry about, yes?
maybe i'm missing the point, but i don't see the cosmotarian
handout system in place.
I didn't say "handout", I said redistribution.
Even a "free" market has rules, and he who defines the rules can
manipulate the outcomes.
Example: in the antebellum south, plantation owners used slave
labor. Now, some of them might have had a moral objection to
slavery, but the price of declining to participate in the slave
market left as the only alternative paying wages to free labor.
Given that this would have forced anyone who chose to decline
participation to raise their prices, they would have been
non-competitive and forced out of business. Obviously, there
weren't many (if any) examples of cotton plantations running on
wage labor. Effectively, anyone in the cotton-production business
was forced to use slave labor, not through the "hard" coercion of
government, but through the "soft" coercion of the market.
Government didn't establish slavery as an institution, market
forces did. And they established it just as effectively as any
government mandate could have. Note, we don't have a "free" market
in slaves anymore.
Likewise, there's nothing "natural" about the demographic evolution
you speak of, it's the inevitable outcome of specific economic and
labor policies, none of which are necessary. Japan, for example, is
confronting it's problem of declining population with advanced technologies
and robotics (surprise! markets can offer more than one
solution to a problem!).
Of course, we could
do the same thing here, but then, that wouldn't result in the
preferred cosmotarian social outcome, which differs from the
socialist policy of redistributing the wealth among the population
only by redistributing the population according to the wealth.
(I'll leave as an exercise to the reader as to which country will
come out ahead - the country that resolves it labor problems
through advancing it's technology, or the one which resolves them
by importing an underclass.) But while the mechanism differs, the
preferred outcome is the same: transfer of wealth from Americans to
foreign nationals.
So I'll reiterate: cosmotarianism == socialist ends by "free"
market means.
Darn younger generation! How dare they object to getting ripped off by our wondrous Social Security pyramid scheme!
I of course won't WTFV because I am at work, but I'm sure
I'd agree with anything that resembles "boomers suck".
The truly hilarious part of it is that if you were making a movie
that needed a '60s style moonbat boomer couple, you couldn't do
better than to typecast Howley and Wilkinson. I haven't seen a
couple that so thoroughly personified just what made the boomers so
incredibly loathsome since Jane Fonda and Tom Hayden.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245