Jesse Walker | May 6, 2008
One Bin Laden tape in four months has a tremendous impact, a dozen Zawahiri tapes in two months has considerably less. In Zawahiri's Q+A, he repeatedly answered questions with an irritated "I already answered that in last month's speech" or "bin Laden already answered that in his speech." That suggests that too many messages dilutes the impact. It also reduces the likelihood of massive media coverage, since the messages become routine. The same applies for the Iraqi insurgency videos: the first exploding hummer might be thrilling, but the 76th not so much.
That's the always-interesting Marc Lynch writing about the limits of the jihadists' online efforts. They bear a striking resemblance to the limits of everyone else's online efforts. Here's some more:
I come across quite a bit of posturing and bravado in these forums, hating on 'enemies' and back-patting of 'allies'. The recent initiation of an 'al-Jazeera watch' feature on one of the forums tracking perceived slights and misrepresentation by the now maligned station reminds me of nothing so much as the partisan media criticism found on so many political blogs. There's a lot of posting of articles or news reports clipped from the media, with long comment threads of cheering or jeering. I remember seeing a bitter post on one of the main forums a few weeks ago (al-Boraq? I forget) complaining that the "internet jihad" had failed since the forum had degenerated into personal attacks and what we would call flame-wars.
Whole thing here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
There's a lot of posting of articles or news reports clipped
from the media, with long comment threads of cheering or
jeering.
When did FARK become a jihadi site?
We ought to have known that this war would be won like Russia
was defeated.
Rock and roll. Bikinis. Western Decadence.
Had we spent a couple billion buying everyone a computer and net
access, we could have resolved the Palestinian problem years ago by
pointing out that suicide bombers wouldn't be able to blog about it
after they were done.
We need to get that yelly dad guy from the Twisted Sister videos to
dress up as a mullah and yell at some fat kid with a kafiya and
finish up with "WHAT DO YOU WANT TO DO WITH YOUR LIFE?" and the fat
kid yells "I wanna rock!" and the rest of the video can be a scene
for scene re-enactment of "We're not gonna take it".
This war is still winnable.
We just need Dee Snider.
Why doesn't Zawahiri just get a MySpace page and be dome with it? Ask the same question too many times and you are no longer a "friend." Makes dsitributing the videos easier too.
"I remember seeing a bitter post on one of the main forums a few
weeks ago (al-Boraq? I forget) complaining that the "internet
jihad" had failed since the forum had degenerated into personal
attacks and what we would call flame-wars."
So Al Quada has become the Daily Kos?
It would all be very comical were it not for, you know, the exploding people and stuff. If only Al Qaeda would get behind something we all hate: spam. Whoever defeats spam will become the new messiah. I would happily bow to him the requisite number of times per day.
I think a distinction should be made concerning goals. Looking
at the article Marc Lynch
links to, I think it muddies the waters to conflate the use of
the web to "attract and indoctrinate" new recruits from the use of
it to "share tactics and technology with new recruits". Having a
messy public face via argumentative forums may put a limit on their
recruitment value, but having a mechanism for identifying "true
believers" in those forums and then moving them to proxy server
sites where serious discussions (i.e. action-oriented, not
ideology-oriented) take place is not necessarily a weakness. This
distinction between the use of the internet for "chatter" versus
the use of the internet for disseminating actionable items (e.g.
travel routes in Iraq) isn't acknowledged enough, even though it
seems clear to the folks on the ground.
Anon
I never knew that AdBlock was saving me from terrorist propaganda. Thanks AdBlock!
Do you think terrorist message boards have trolls that pose as "Crusaders" and Jews and make fun of Mohammed? Or if they use funny handles like "Zawahiri's Turban"?
Rimfax,
So, what's the corollary of Godwin's Law in their
world?
Someone drops the Godfrey of
Bouillon bomb.
MmmDates | Rajab 12, 1429 AH, 12:34 p.m. | #
First! (on the Israeli bus, lol!)
IUD Ali | Rajab 12, 1429 AH, 12:31 p.m. | #
Uh, jihad is spelled with a "j"
Al-Edward | Rajab 12, 1429 AH, 12:34 p.m. | #
You shiites are a bunch of Nazi-worshiping scum.
MoBombHad | Rajab 12, 1429 AH, 12:38 p.m. | #
You shiites are a bunch of Nazi-worshiping scum.
No we're not, proof heir.
IUD Ali | Rajab 12, 1429 AH, 12:40 p.m. | #
Dude, you totally Rickroll'd Al-Edward!
Win!
Zawahiri's Foil | Rajab 12, 1429 AH, 12:46 p.m. | #
You guys need to be serious. When I used to hang out with Yassir
Arafat (praise be to Allah) and bin Laden, I would come to this
board for good jihad discussion.
Now it's clogged up with (probably Christian) trolls and
idiots.
I'm canceling my account.
MoBombHad | Rajab 12, 1429 AH, 12:34 p.m. | #
DRINK WATER!
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245