David Weigel | April 7, 2008
I'm not surprised that the McCain campaign is getting opponents
and reporters to back off the
"100 years in Iraq" quote that's been dogging him. I was
in the
room when McCain said it, and I thought it was an entertaining
tug-of-war between McCain and an anti-war questioner, not a
campaign-shaking gaffe.
The wiggle room comes when McCain says he's okay with the 100 years
"as long as our soldiers are not being wounded or maimed or
killed." And that's where McCain's defenders have chosen to stand
and fight. See, McCain doesn't want to fight a hot war for
100 years. He wants to have a base there until the Middle East
stops producing threats to the U.S. To say otherwise is "an attack
on McCain's character," as Michael Goldfarb puts it in that
Weekly Standard link.
That's a dodge, though. It assumes that 1)there is nothing controversial about building permanent bases in Iraq, 2)that maintaining those bases would be completely positive effects on the region, and that 3)there's nothing wrong with a potential president telling the world we'll be in Iraq forever. Not much room for realpolitik there, eh? It's unfair to distort what McCain says, but it's wrong to portray this as harmless straight talk.
Headline explained here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245