Radley Balko | March 12, 2008
The Clarion-Ledger reports today that Mississippi District Attorney Forrest Allgood has now officially dropped all charges against Levon Brooks, who spent more than a decade in prison for a crime another man now admits he committed. That now makes three people Allgood has convicted of murder who were later exonerated or acquitted. And he kept one of them—Kennedy Brewer—in prison an extra five years after DNA testing cleared him, because Allgood refused to let go of testimony from disgraced bite-mark "expert" Dr. Michael West.
There's not much other news in the article, save for this:
Neither Brewer nor Brooks is getting compensation from Mississippi for the years they wrongly spent behind bars, but they can bring lawsuits.
Mississippi's legislators will probably want to set up some sort of structured compensation system fairly quickly. I have a feeling federal jurors aren't going to be kind to the state as these exonerations pile up, and it comes out just how ready and willing the state's prosecutors have been to put bad expert testimony into evidence.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Kinda makes "reasonable doubt" another one of those concepts that Americans pay lip service to.
How much $ is enough? I wouldn't even know where to begin to put a price on a day, week, month, or year of wrongful incarceration. Without your work Radley, a lot of us would be ignorant about this. Keep up the good work.
The Clarion-Ledger reports today that Mississippi District
Attorney Forrest Allgood has now officially dropped all charges
against Levon Brooks, who spent more than a decade in prison for a
crime another man now admits he committed.
Gambling is so heart-breakingly addicting to people because big
wins are arbitrarily distributed between an overwhelming number of
losses.
I think that's the same reason I'm addicted to politics.
If this actually results in some (widespread) justice, I may have another day of Spitzer-like glee. Well, days, really.
I have a feeling federal jurors aren't going to be kind to
the state as these exonerations pile up, and it comes out just how
ready and willing the state's prosecutors have been to put bad
expert testimony into evidence.
Really? I hope so, but I have a feeling nobody's going to give a
rats ass beyond the media circus.
I wonder if Reason will publish an update on this issue (see
below). I guess not, since reason is not particularly interested in
getting the story right when it comes to religion; race or drugs,
on the other hand, those are more pressing matters. No, I'm not a
catholic. But as a libertarian, I wish reason would hold itself to
the same high principles regarding religious bigotry it holds
everyone one to regarding racism.
Reports that the Vatican has published a new list of the seven
deadly sins of modern times that includes littering and economic
inequality is simply not true, affirmed the episcopal conference of
England and Wales.
The conference released a statement today clarifying that an
interview published Sunday by L'Osservatore Romano with Bishop
Gianfranco Girotti, regent of the tribunal of he Apostolic
Penitentiary, was misinterpreted in the media as an official
Vatican update to the seven deadly sins, laid out by Pope Gregory
the Great in the sixth century.
"The Vatican has not published a new list of seven deadly sins;
this is not a new Vatican edict," said the conference. "The story
originated from an interview that Bishop Gianfranco Girotti gave to
the L'Osservatore Romano in which he was questioned about new forms
of social sins in this age of globalization."
jj,
I feel so bad for Catholics. I mean, they really only control South
American at this point. Only one continent! They have hundreds of
millions of people giving them money to grease their way into
heaven, but a website said something bad about them and it's a
mortal wound. Boo-fucking-hoo.
It's really going to suck for them when all those empty European
churches
start converting to mosques.
I feel so bad for Catholics. I mean, they really only
control South American at this point. Only one continent! They have
hundreds of millions of people giving them money to grease their
way into heaven, but a website said something bad about them and
it's a mortal wound. Boo-fucking-hoo.
You're right, SugarFree. We're only to gripe about inaccuracy in
reporting when it's affecting "us." Since we are not catholic or
religious, let's applaud the lies, hypocrisy and hate in an
otherwise 'reason'able rag.
I have my problems with catholicism, but you dropped the ball on
this one.
some guy: I couldn't care if catholicism in it's current form survives. I do care about reason's double standard. Doesn't bother you, does it?
""I feel so bad for Catholics. I mean, they really only control
South American at this point. Only one continent! They have
hundreds of millions of people giving them money to grease their
way into heaven, but a website said something bad about them and
it's a mortal wound. Boo-fucking-hoo.""
Sounds a lot like the federal government. You're right: no need for
any accuracy in any reporting. Boo-fucking-hoo.
Ape,
I don't have a problem with Catholics, I have a problem with
one-issue commenters coming by just to bitch about some slight,
real or imagined. Google a bit, you'll find I've mocked them on
numerous issues in the past.
If you go back and read his comments on that thread, you'll find he
didn't try and point out the "not replacing 10 commandments" fact,
just to whine about anti-catholic bias. And now, off-topic, he
comes by here to whine as well.
Oh, and the way, your use of the pathetic 'reason'able
joke means that you either don't come here too often and are a
single-issue commenter yourself, come by to lecture us. (Assuming
you're not jj's sock puppet in the first place.)
Would you like my mother's phone number? You could call her and
tattle about how naughty I'm being.
I've been a regular (daily) reason reader for over a year. I've
posted probably over a hundred posts on a range of issues. Hardly a
single-issue poster (as if there is anything wrong with
that).
I'm sorry I offended your sensibilities. I'm more sorry you are not
willing to admit that accuracy in reporting should apply to all. I
guess libertarians aren't all that different from conservatives
when it comes to hypocrisy :(
Welcome to the 'sphere, jj.
(There are rumors of inaccuracies, lies, innuendo, satire!)
You're right SugarFree. I'm a relatively new poster. I wasn't aware I couldn't just post. What do I have to do to join the Big Boys Club?
I really touched a nerve at the Muppet Show. It's sort of cute
in a retarded way.
This is all off-topic, so I'll stop. Feel free to be an idiot and
think this means you've "won."
Anyone who read that Seven Deadly story and really thought it
was a replacement list for the original seven deadly sins was a
moron to begin with.
It was obvious that list was just Bishop Girotti talking out his
ass. But it was a fun link, easy to ridicule (and thus I applaud
it). Which, I assume, is why Sullum posted it.
Now can we get back to Balko's (serious) post?
I've been on H&R for a year or so and I disagree with jj.
Sure Reason is not always right, and some errors of fact occurs,
but no reporting if perfect, and the Reason crew likes to have a
little fun. It would be wrong to think that Reason should live to a
higher standard of reporting than standard media. That may be a
goal, but it's not a requirement.
I'm sure there are other far more important institutions in your
life that need monitoring for truth than a magazine. Certainly so
for those who live in MS.
My kid attended
this talk. Melendez was on Florida's death row nearly 18 years
and all he got was a pair of pants, a shirt and $100. No official
apology either, not even after it was revealed that the prosecutors
withheld evidence that would have exonerated him.
...but they can bring lawsuits.
I understand it's pretty tough getting any compensation for
wrongful conviction from the state of Floriduh, even with evidence
of prosecutorial shenanigans.
"I guess libertarians aren't all that different from
conservatives when it comes to hypocrisy :("
WTF jj, You called yourself a libertarian in your first post you
disingenuous asshole.
and what exactly are you talking about anyway? Your pissed because
reason didn't say what you wanted about a nonsense story?
stfu.
Radley, keep up the good work. If we someday get to see hayne,
west, allgood and the lot thrown in jail, (here's hoping) I think
the people of MS will have you and your excellent investigative
journalism to thank for it.
Time to flee Mississippi: Either you'll end up in jail for a crime you didn't commit, or you'll end up paying for someone who did.
JeeZus H christ on a pogo stick - I am fucking confused. What in
the holy hell does the vatican have to do with injustice in
Mississippi? Are all those Baptists a bunch of Catholic fellow
travellers? Somebody help me! And someone else get me another glass
of wine.
Oh, and as to the actual story here. At the moment I hope every
fucking taxpayer in MS takes it up the arse for the next 20 years
as payback for your sorry-ass, backwoods, 4th world excuse of a
state. You have got to be some kind of a shit-hole to make me glad
I live in the People's Republik of Californistan.
Now, jj, be a good altar boy and come blow me.
There are some good folks in MS, juris. But the justice system has been run by criminals for a long, long time. Allgood & co. are merely the latest in a long line. Stand up against them while living there, you'd better have really good life insurance.
Juris point is that the good folk of MS have recieved the
government they deserve. The shit continues to happen because the
people of MS have done very little to stop it. It will contiune to
happen until the people of MS unite against this type of behavior,
or the people of MS receive some proxy to fight on their cowardly
behalf, enter Radley.
Everyone is MS should send Radley $5 bucks for his efforts. Radley,
I get a percentage for bringing it up.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245