David Weigel | January 29, 2008
No one
actor knows more about the dark, pre-Giuliani New York than Joe
Buck himself, Jon Voight. He's stumping for the mayor in his
Florida farewell tour, spellbinding audiences with tales of the
mayor who swooped into office and took care of all the
country-fried johns and their tiny rheumatic friends before
they could bring their poison to the Sunshine State.
I lived there for ten years when I was learning to be an actor. I saw the city go downhill—it was a sad thing to see. Home is where your heart is, and I was heartbroken to see it become the most crime-ridden city in the country. That wasn't a statistic—you couldn't walk down certain streets. Kids couldn't walk outside with their Jordan shoes. It was a bad, bad time. We were all praying something would happen. You pray, but you don't know if something's going to come and change things. And then, from God, Rudy Giuliani came!
More like this. And more here:
"God sent an angel, his name was Rudy Giuliani,'' said Voight, adding: "He's kind of a genius.''
For... slightly more nuance and a few more facts on New York in the Rudy century, read Tim Cavanaugh here or me here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
He should read "Freakonomics" to get a better idea of what slowed crime in America during that period. For New Yawk, Rudy's policies were only marginally influential if I remember correctly.
And to think people wonder why Angelina Jolie is crazy as a shithouse rat.
You pray, but you don't know if something's going to come
and change things. And then, from God, Rudy Giuliani
came
I've got to hand it to Jon Voight, that's a better argument for
atheism than Christopher Hitchens ever made.
Rudy gets a bad rap around here, but he was exactly what New
York needed at the time. Freakonomics was interesting but to think
all of the crime issue in new york was solved by Roe V. Wade is
absurd. For example, The Tipping Point makes the case for the
Broken Window theory of crime prevention playing a part.
In any case just because Rudy was good for New York 15 years ago
does not make him good for the country in its current state.
You know, I just saw the same pic when I googled images of Jon
Voight. I wanted to confirm it was him in that latest Disney
loopfest, National Treasure. The movie lies about Lincoln and
places Mayan ruins in South Dakota.
That Giuliani sure don't have a pretty mouth on him. Take a look at
this:
That wasn't a statistic-you couldn't walk down certain
streets.
You could just shout, "Hey! I'm walkin' here! I'm walking here!"
and they'd usually leave you alone.
Fun fact: that line was an ad lib.
I think that Rudy's iron fist definitely had some impact, but
New York's status as a world financial and cultural capital had put
a floor under its property values, and the value of Manhattan real
estate set in motion waves of gentrification that made NYC a city
of the wealthy. That kind of city will experience a reduction in
crime.
Try the same set of policies in Cleveland and see what it gets
you.
No wonder Angelina Jolie doesnt claim any bloodline with that doofus any longer.
And then, from God, Rudy Giuliani came!
Well, can't argue with God...
There's apparently something alluring about tough guys who can't manage their personal lives so they fell qualified to manage yours.
I think that Rudy's iron fist definitely had some impact,
but New York's status as a world financial and cultural capital had
put a floor under its property values, and the value of Manhattan
real estate set in motion waves of gentrification that made NYC a
city of the wealthy. That kind of city will experience a reduction
in crime.
Yeah and getting rid of rent control was essential for that value
to be realized.
That last comment wasn't meant to give credit to Rudy, merely to point out the large number of factors that lead to New York City's current gentrifcation.
Hell, I think Cleveland would be ready to try anything after a
long, long, long, etc. time in the wilderness.
In my lifetime, I saw Kucinich bankrupt the city, the graft of Boss
White, the vacuity of Jane Campbell, and the gun-snatching &
whore-busting of Frank Jackson - Cleveland's Li'l Rudy.
Somewhere in there, Voinovich didn't suck too bad.
You know, I've never seen Jon Voigt and DONDEROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! in the same room....
People were perfectly willing to let Rudy bust some skulls in
order to clean up the city, because it was a real fucking mess. Oh,
sure, they would complain about it at cocktail parties and on
editorial pages, but they wanted to be able to walk down the street
at night.
Now, the extent to which his busting of skulls was a serious factor
is debatable. But since a lot of people in NYC would never consider
the lessening of statism as a vehicle for crime reduction and
prosperity, the statist "solution" is what they view as
successful.
"God sent an angel, his name was Rudy Giuliani,'' said
Voight, adding: "He's kind of a genius.''
Archangel Rudy, Patron Saint of Horses Asses.
Wonder how 'Ratso' feels?
"God sent an angel, his name was Rudy Giuliani,'' said
Voight, adding: "He's kind of a genius.''
NO! No No No No. Not again. This country can't take another POTUS
from God. Let's let the Devil run things for a spell while we lick
our wounds.
A good deal of shadenfreud is merited at Rudy's expense.
Having said that, editor-in-chief Fonzie is also due for some
banana peel/open manhole karma as well.
"New York's status as a world financial and cultural capital had
put a floor under its property values, and the value of Manhattan
real estate set in motion waves of gentrification that made NYC a
city of the wealthy. That kind of city will experience a reduction
in crime."
That's exactly what I'm hoping is/will happen in London (where I
live), but I fear the process is seriously hampered by the large
amount of socialized housing throughout the city.
I, being a libertarian, would obviously call for the privatization
of the social housing stock, but my liberal friends would no doubt
argue that without anything to constrain them London property (and
living) prices would go through the roof, making the city
unsustainable for anybody not already wealthy to live in.
I have to admit, as a relatively modest earner, the cost of living
is much more demanding here than elsewhere in the UK (for example -
is this true of NYC vs. the rest of the US?).
Sorry to ask such a simple question, but why, economically literate
Reasonoids, are prices (of everything, not just property - which I
can understand) so high in economically successful locations? Or is
this a London-specific problem?
2 Points:
1 - The Broken Window Theory would get a lot more respect if it was
called the open bag of chips theory.
2 - The moment I decided to change my life around was when I saw
Midnight Cowboy and realized that I was Ratzo to a t.
AND ANOTHER THING...
I for the life of me can't see why someone would want to live in
Manhattan except for ease of commute reasons. And if Wall Street
goes down the toilet, there'll be a lot fewer of those people, and
we might see the rebirth of Dinkinsville.
Cerro -- One theory is that it has to do with the constraint of
growth. NYC was successful financially but it was geographically
and otherwise restrained from growing outward like the western
cities. In other words, urban sprawl generally keeps prices down
because you can create suburbs, ex-urbs, etc. -- much the way that
people who can't afford Manhattan move to Brooklyn (or to New
Jersey, or Kansas).
London seems to be a bit of an anomaly, in that it is swallowing
all of SE England but prices aren't coming down. I think this may
have to do with the fact that it's a city on an island, but I don't
know. I recently compared real estate in Hawai'i v. Montana. You
can guess how that turned out.
In these constrained urban areas, you end up with poor and
homeless. There aren't any suburbs to move to that are affordable,
and as a result you don't gut the inner city and create dirt cheap
real estate. So what do you do with that?
As for other prices, I think it's just supply and demand. Takes a
hell of a lot of fuel to get produce in and out of major urban
areas. I recently saw watermelons for sale in NYC for $7. I used to
sell 20 lbs watermelons in the southwest for $3.
Cerro, lots of people want to live in London and NYC for many reasons. This drives up the price of real estate. Commercial property is expensive because all real estate is now expensive due to demand. To cover the rent or lease of the business it is necessary to charge a lot for whatever one sells. The logistics of shipping in food and other goods that are not produced in these cities is also more complex. In other words the space premium causes all sorts of ways for prices to be increased. Rent, transportation, etc.
I have to admit, as a relatively modest earner, the cost of
living is much more demanding here than elsewhere in the UK (for
example - is this true of NYC vs. the rest of the US?).
absolutely.
though not quite as absolute as it once was, perhaps. you'd be
amazed at what they charge for shitholes all across the other four
boroughs.
Cerro,
Because you can't import more land to meet a growing demand on the
established supply. It's the "location" part of "economically
successful location."
One possibility would be to tear down the historic areas of the
city - the part responsible for it being a desireable place to live
- to build at much greater density, and thereby both boost supply
and reduce demand. But that's probably not a good idea,
either.
A better solution would be to build those suburbs a little more
like the city, so they can supply more housing. It probably
wouldn't bring down London housing prices, but it would give people
more choices.
There are many reasons, some attributable to Giuliani, some not,
why New York City has turned into one giant frat boy coke
party the paradise that it is. Moreover, gentrification has
helped coked up ex-frat boys and bleach blonde Jersey sluts
spending daddy's money the real estate market push out
minorities lower income individuals, thereby making
the city boring and lame safe for morally upstanding
individuals such as the mayor himself.
"He's kind of a genius.''
Man, the bar for genius keeps getting lower and lower. If this
keeps up, I should be able to qualify soon. Once I make it, I'm
definitely getting it on a business card like Wile E. Coyote.
"To cover the rent or lease of the business it is necessary to
charge a lot for whatever one sells."
Understood.
So, if neither outward sprawl or tearing down historic parts of the
city are viable options, high prices are here to stay, it would
seem.
Happily though, London would seem better placed for expansion than
your own NYC.
Sucks to be on your side of the pond!
Thanks for the answers, folks.
Sucks to be on your side of the pond!
Perhaps, but the US has a more than one major city and a business
or person has the option of saying fukk it if New York is too much
of a bitch to hit up Chicago or LA or San Francisco, etc.
For the UK, it seems like London's the only game in town.
Vitriolic , Florida-based windbag radio personality Todd Schnitt endorsed Giuliani yesterday, too, providing more evidence that only retards are going to vote for the Rudster.
Lamar, that pretty much sums it up.
""""God sent an angel, his name was Rudy Giuliani,''"""
I think he sent the big devil that could whip the smaller
devils
I saw the city go downhill
Huh? NY has always been downhill. Just ask Kitty Genevese who was
murdered in the streets while New Yorkers closed their windows to
block out the screams.
Never fear lads. After he gets hammered tonight in the Florida primary, we won't hear another word about Rudy for quite a while(thank God).
Flashback: Giuliani to Arafat: "Take a
hike!"
Source:
http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/2008/01/picture-is-worth-thousand-words.html
Didn't you hear, An Ottawa Reader?
Giuliani's campaign released a statment saying that their intention
was really to position themselves well for the 2012 elections, and
that they never planned on winning Florida. In fact, he hasn't even
spent much time campaigning there, so any result he gets will be
astonishing grassroots support!
NY has always been downhill. Just ask Kitty Genevese who was
murdered in the streets while New Yorkers closed their windows to
block out the screams.
In California, they find that a few miles of limited-access highway
does a much better job of blocking out those screams.
Hey "Muslims Against Sharia" You do know Arafat was a secular socialist who was reviled by groups like Hammas right? Oh no, you don't know that, because to you they're all alike!
Let's let the Devil run things for a spell while we lick our
wounds.
I wouldn't have pegged you for a Hillary supporter, Warren. ;)
Cesar - thx. It helps that it's all pretty much written for me on these pages...
twc, the bystander effect is by no means limited to new york
city.>/i>
Course not, Dhex, but rank hyperbole sometimes serves the purpose
of making a long comment, well, shorter.
NYC has had crime problems (for all of the usual reasons) since
well before Roosevelt the First was police commissioner.
My point was that Voigt could not have possibly seen NYC go
downhill in "the last ten years" because NYC has always had
problems.
OTOH, when Voigt was living in NYC, that was when the Genovese
murder took place.
I'll shaddup now.
In California, they find that a few miles of limited-access
highway does a much better job of blocking out those
screams.
That. And the 25 foot sound walls.
I know the Ghoul gets a lot of crap for his methods of cleaning up the crime problem, but part of what he did was to make people care more about their own neighborhoods. Leaving aside the stuff we don't like, he insisted on the city taking care of things they should. Cleaning up the trash, filling the potholes, immediate graffiti removal, and by doing so it encourages people to live more like civilized people. It is a valid premise and it works with all of us, especially kids.
I recently compared real estate in Hawai'i v. Montana. You
can guess how that turned out.
So you're moving to Hawaii, right? *nudge, nudge* Aloha,
dude!
(you wouldn't like Montana... trust me)
headline: RUDY GETS ENDORSEMENT/SYMPATHY IN FLORIDA FROM GUY WHOSE KIDS ALSO HATE THEIR FATHER.
If Rudy really wants to clean up, I'd happily buy him a bucket and a squeegee, and point him toward the entrance to the Holland Tunnel.
"He's kind of a genius."
Ghouliani reminds me of Simon Bar Sinister.
/Help us Underdog!
Here in Chicago we just try to keep our violent crime to the South and West sides.
Ah, this means that the coveted Jolie endorsement is soon to come. As a counter to the endorsement of her estranged father, Milo Minderbinder.
Cleaning up the trash, filling the potholes, immediate graffiti removal, and by doing so it encourages people to live more like civilized people. It is a valid premise and it works with all of us, especially kids.
The problem was, from what I've heard from various New Yorkers, is
that in his second term he went from harassing actual criminals to
harassing hot dog vendors. The guy didn't know when to stop.
Just voted for Ron Paul in Broward County, now I officially wash my hands of him...
Reinmoose,
It took me a moment to realize that had to be a joke. I was about
to ask for a link.
("Maybe this will be the year the polls die?" Anyone who thinks the
Paulistes have been grasping at straws hasn't been paying attention
to to the Rudistes lately.)
Question for the floor: Would things have worked out any
differently if Rudy had campaigned hard in the early
primary states?
Cerro, while it's correct that NYC can't expand it has more incentive to refurbish areas when they get bad, rather than just move outward leaving bad areas to get worse faster. So, NYC can actually use it's limitations as an advantage in maintaining a desirable compact location. London can just stretch for a while. And like someone else pointed out, we have many cities to turn to. The UK should actually do this. I haven't looked at the physical limitations of Liverpool, Manchester, Glasgow, and Edinburgh but what's stopping people from putting some capital into them instead? Sometimes not being a behemoth is desirable in itself.
One more: with Rudy out of the picture, which GOP candidate will
become the new darling of Fox News?
(Answer: McCain, who is the most likely to hand Fox News an Iran
Show to keep them nicely profitable for the next eight years, or at
any rate until the devil reclaims Mr. Murdoch.)
Ottawa, we will never know. I doubt he would have done a whole lot better in Iowa or South Carolina, but I don't see why he couldn't have done well in NH or Nevada, at least picking up a few delegates and not completely blowing his chances and getting pushed to the end of the stage at debates.
The Wine Commonsewer | January 29, 2008, 1:28pm | #
I know the Ghoul gets a lot of crap for his methods of cleaning up
the crime problem, but part of what he did was to make people care
more about their own neighborhoods. Leaving aside the stuff we
don't like, he insisted on the city taking care of things they
should. Cleaning up the trash, filling the potholes, immediate
graffiti removal, and by doing so it encourages people to live more
like civilized people. It is a valid premise and it works with all
of us, especially kids.
Amen! You can't just throw "everything Guiliani did" into a big box
and treat it all the same.
I suspect that Rudy competing more in NH could have seriously disrupted John McCain's bid and we'd be looking at a 3-way contest between Rudy, Romney, and Huckabee... or possibly just Rudy and Huckabee, if Rudy did well in Michigan. It would be the Sickeningly Hawkish Tax Cutting Pro-choicer vs. the National Greatness Evangelical Former-fatty!
I watched Midnight Cowboy for the first time recently. What
struck me the most was the overall shitty, run-down, decrepit state
of NYC.
Then I read some contemporary reviews of the movie (mostly New
Yorkers) and no one even mentioned it. New Yorkers back in the 70s
had no fucking clue that people weren't supposed to live like that.
(at least people in Detroit today know they are in hell)
Try the same set of policies in Cleveland and see what it
gets you.
You get Baltimore.
why ... are prices (of everything, not just property - which
I can understand) so high in economically successful
locations?
Yes, most things are more expensive, but not nearly as outrageous
as rent. I find with my salary, once the rent is paid, almost
everything else seems cheap compared to the distressed city I came
from (Buffalo). In other words, the high salaries more than make up
for the high costs.
PS. NYC is not like California, where rents are outrageous
everywhere. It's quite easy to find affordable housing in Jersey or
LI.
PPS. I used to laugh at the idiots who mourned for 70's crime-ridden Manhattan. Today we have the opposite, and yes, Manhattan is now boring in addition to unaffordable to mere mortals.
Here in Chicago we just try to keep our violent crime to the
South and West sides.
Fool around with the map at ChicagoCrime.org
The violent crime is more evenly distributed than you would
think.
In law school, I had a couple of classmates held up in Lincoln Park. The train to Oak Park was also a popular location for hold-ups and robberies, with one of each. I was merely threatened and got spat at in the Printers' Row area (downtown, slightly southerly). I had to laugh when I heard that Tampa had more violent crime than Chicago. One city may have been underreporting its crimes.
The violent crime is more evenly distributed than you would
think.
The outrageously-gentrified, high-priced NYC neighborhood I left
last year (Chelsea) has had a startling number of murders lately,
perpetrated entirely by drunken residents of New Jersey and Long
Island of college age in the wee hours of the morning. What
surprises me most about the pattern of murder is how often it's so
predictable (or at least, not exactly "random"). Drug gangs,
domestic violence, guidos.
The train to Oak Park was also a popular location for
hold-ups and robberies, with one of each.
Do you mean you were held-up once and robbed once, and, if so, what
is the difference between a hold-up and a robbery? And which train
- Green line (Lake St el) or Blue line (Congress)?
Cerro - My uncle lives in NYC on Broadway. In his building they
permanently shut down one of the freight elevators.
Which they then rented out for $2400 a month IIRC to a guy selling
nothing but cigerettes.
$2400 a month for an area the size of a freight elevator. I guess
he was renting by the square inch at that price. I have 2.25 acres
with a 1700 sq. ft home and a 500 sq. ft. detached workshop and I
don't pay half that much a month for my mortgage. My cousin who
recently graduated college just got a place in the Wallstreet
district. A nice one bedroom efficency he has to share with a
freind because it costs $3000 a month to rent. My front patio has
more sq. footage than his whole apartment. When he sent our
relatives pics of his place they were asking if there were more but
all it took was one pic to get the whole place in the picture LMAO.
But he does have a wonderful view of all the congestion surrounding
him.
The only thing that makes things more expensive is the fools
willing to shell out the money regardless of cost. Pretty soon NYC
will be sold by the square millimeter.
Oh and Rudy sucks Chocolate Salty Balls
highnumber,
The Oak Park train incidents both happened to a friend of mine. She
was one seat away from the hold-up; she was the victim of the
robbery. It's a robbery if force is used to take something (in
Illinois, it's really all "theft", I believe, but I speak in common
law parlance here). In her case, it was a purse that was grabbed,
and the guy fought her for it. She was (is) a toughie. In fact,
she's still a JAG attorney 12 years later. Not surprising for a
native of the South Side ☺
I bet it was on the Green line. Though they run through a lot of
the same neighborhoods essentially, and the Blue is the one that
runs all night, for some reason the Green attracts a rougher crowd.
(Could be because the Green veers south and runs through some
really rough areas, while the Blue veers northwest toward O'Hare
after the Loop.) For the record, the worst experience I've had on
the CTA was a guy in our car who smelled like the dead possum in
his pants had taken a crap after rolling in pig shit. You could
call his odor a form of violence.
Does "hold-up" imply that a gun was used?
But it makes perfect sense to take everyone's guns away from them, especially when they live in large cities. Now, we're just waiting for the criminals to comply...waiting...waiting...
highnumber,
This was thirteen years ago--don't remember which line. And yes,
we're talking hold up with a gun.
When I lived there, the Guardian Angels were around the stops in
Rogers Park. There were also some CTA ninjas (yeah, all in black. .
.with dogs, also black) on that line.
"""The problem was, from what I've heard from various New
Yorkers, is that in his second term he went from harassing actual
criminals to harassing hot dog vendors. The guy didn't know when to
stop."""
I think that sums it up. Rudy did get some results, I'm a major
critic but some credit is due. He is a ends justifies the means
kinda of guy, I am not.
"""Which they then rented out for $2400 a month IIRC to a guy
selling nothing but cigerettes."""
At 7 or 8 bucks a pack.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245