Reason Magazine
- reason.com
- reason.tv
- reason.org
- Donate
- Site Search:
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsadvertisements
One Cheer for Huckabee
I have to confess I'm enjoying Mike Huckabee's victory, even though I disagree with virtually all of his platform. Mitt Romney represents everything Americans hate about politicians: the empty man hungry for power and willing to say anything to get it, the privileged man who thinks he can buy an election without actually standing for anything. Intellectually I know I should prefer him to Huckabee. I'd rather my rulers be driven by personal ambition than by ideology, except in those rare cases where their principles bear some resemblance to mine. But for now I'm happy to let my visceral reaction to Romney rule my mood. If I can't have optimism, then at least I can have schadenfreude. If politics were a 1980s teen gross-out comedy, Mitt would be the Alpha Beta frat and the Iowa caucuses would be the revenge of the nerds.
Mudkipz|1.3.08 @ 10:02PM|#
So, Giuliani would be a character actor who appears in a single scene, then?
Franklin Harris|1.3.08 @ 10:21PM|#
The good news is that Ron Paul is in a statistical dead heat for third. The bad news is that he is on the short end of that dead heat and the other two candidates he's bunched up with (McCain and Thompson, both back from the dead) are his main competition in New Hampshire.
|1.3.08 @ 10:36PM|#
Paul needs to beat real candidates in New Hampshire or he's a
sideshow freak for the rest of the campaign.
Bad night for Paul. Sorry.
Eric Dondero|1.3.08 @ 10:43PM|#
So Jesse Walker says that he likes Mike Huckabee, the most
anti-libertarian of all 8 GOP Presidential candidates.
Wow. What a revelation.
Jesse, are you sure you're at the right place? This is Reason
Magazine after all, a LIBERTARIAN publication.
Jesse Walker|1.3.08 @ 10:44PM|#
So Jesse Walker says that he likes Mike Huckabee
I see the evening's events have not improved Eric Dondero's reading
comprehension skills.
Eric Dondero|1.3.08 @ 10:44PM|#
Franklin, how can you say Paul is in a "statistical dead heat"
with Thompson and McCain.
They are at 13.5%. Paul is at 9.2%.
That's quite a difference there. Even my High School Math teacher
would say that 13.5% isn't quite equal to 9.2.
Mudkipz|1.3.08 @ 10:46PM|#
So? Paul beat Giuliani by more than twice over. The fact that he scored double digits in a protectionist, populist evangelical state while running on a "fuck your ethanol" platform is pretty impressive.
Fluffy|1.3.08 @ 10:46PM|#
I would love to see a fucking asteroid burst through the ceiling and crush Huckabee's head during this crappy speech. What a piece of shit.
Stephen The Goldberger|1.3.08 @ 10:47PM|#
Romney's cold, calculating and soulless businessman is what every libertarian really wants in charge but is afraid to admit. Huckabee's win is terrible for the party and the chance of it adhering to fiscal conservatism.
Eric Dondero|1.3.08 @ 10:47PM|#
I read enough Jesse. You're clearly bashing Mitt Romney and
favoring the ultra-Statist Religious Rightist Mike Huckabee.
Romney at least leans libertarian, and has some prominent
libertarians like William Weld backing him.
Huckabee is almost the polar opposite of everything we libertarians
stand for: He's fiscally liberal, socially conservative, and weak
on Defense.
He's the anti-Goldwater. And now Jesse Walker says nice things
about him.
Sheesh!
Mudkipz|1.3.08 @ 10:48PM|#
"Even my High School Math teacher would say that 13.5% isn't
quite equal to 9.2."
And your high school English teacher would probably say that you
should stop randomly capitalizing things.
aspendougy|1.3.08 @ 10:49PM|#
Dear Jesse:
When Bhutto was assassinated, Huckabee made a crazy statement about
Pakistan having the most illegals here next to Mexico, which he
never retracted. I think he is much more of an opportunist than
Romney. That kind of piling on is bad.
Franklin Harris|1.3.08 @ 10:50PM|#
Yeah, four percentage points, that's huge, Eric. And what's with the lack of Rudy 9/11 boosting tonight? Maybe it has something to do with Rudy 9/11 pulling in about one third of the votes Paul is.
Jesse Walker|1.3.08 @ 10:50PM|#
You're clearly bashing Mitt Romney and favoring the
ultra-Statist Religious Rightist Mike Huckabee.
Half right.
|1.3.08 @ 10:54PM|#
If I can't have optimism, then at least I can have
schadenfreude.
Unfortunately...you're still left with Huckabee...a
willfully ignorant hick who can't answer a straight question
because he's to busy making a joke out of it.
There's no 'at least he's better than...' nonsense to enjoy because
they all (except Ron Paul, of course) pretty much blow.
On the plus side, Obama has trounced HillBillary.
dpotts|1.3.08 @ 10:54PM|#
I think Jesse's point was that as unlikeable as Huck is, it's fun to watch the goofy little guy who doesn't have much in the way of a war chest beat the smug, soulless, unctuous uber-politician once in awhile. RTFA next time, kay?
Jesse Walker|1.3.08 @ 10:56PM|#
I think Jesse's point was that as unlikeable as Huck is,
it's fun to watch the goofy little guy who doesn't have much in the
way of a war chest beat the smug, soulless, unctuous
uber-politician once in awhile.
Yes, that's it, except that it doesn't even matter that Huckabee is
a goofy little guy. I just like watching Romney lose.
|1.3.08 @ 10:57PM|#
has some prominent libertarians like William Weld backing
him.
Who the fuck is William Weld?
Nash|1.3.08 @ 11:00PM|#
Fascinating data here:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/#val=IAREP
Paul got 29% of the independent vote in the state, beating out
McCain. He also did well among 17-29 year olds.
Eric Dondero|1.3.08 @ 11:02PM|#
Well, that's just great there Jesse Walker. A prominent
libertarian Republican, the guy who practically put the word
"libertarian Republican" on the map, former Mass. Governor William
Weld, enthusiastically backs Mitt Romney and you A REPRESENTATIVE
OF THE LIBERTARIAN MOVEMENT, have the audacity to bash
Romney.
Dude, we are facing the most Statist Republican to come down the
pike in years in Mike Huckabee.
We need to unite behind a Fiscal Con - Romney, Giuliani or Thompson
to stop this guy.
And all you can do is bash one of the three Fiscal Cons.
Shame on you!
rho|1.3.08 @ 11:04PM|#
I read enough Jesse. You're clearly bashing Mitt Romney and
favoring the ultra-Statist Religious Rightist Mike
Huckabee.
My name is Eric Dondero.
I like hookers with coupons; gripping the soles of my shoes with my
toes so I'm not flung into space; and saying ridiculous things like
"I'm running for Ron Paul's TX14 seat in Congress", hoping nobody
notices when I figure out what a loser proposition that was.
Mudkipz|1.3.08 @ 11:05PM|#
Hello, whine one one? Mr. Dondero needs a waaaambulance!
Also, dude, Huckabee's not going to win a general election, so you
can relax.
|1.3.08 @ 11:06PM|#
Taktix, how dare you say that!! William Weld handed out flyers in the freezing cold to support libertarian causes. Who the fuck are you to come into my libertarian movement and be a libertarian exclusionist!! Anyone with a score of 80/80 on blah blah blah.
|1.3.08 @ 11:07PM|#
RTFA next time, kay?
I did...my comment didn't negate walker's article at all. Don't be
so quick on the trigger, kay?
|1.3.08 @ 11:08PM|#
idk Jesse, I kinda liked that Mitt Romney didn't seem to have an
agenda other than getting elected. It encouraged me that he wasn't
some idealist gunning to change the world, and therefore couldn't
probably care less about what he did in office.
Huckabee however...
I'm going to start reading the bible now so that when it becomes
test time, I can pass it and avoid having to be put in the gas
chamber.
|1.3.08 @ 11:11PM|#
Wait, so if Weld endorses a candidate, no libertarian may ever
speak ill of that candidate again?
What the hell kind of sense does that make?
|1.3.08 @ 11:11PM|#
We need to unite behind a Fiscal Con - Romney, Giuliani or
Thompson to stop this guy...And all you can do is bash one of the
three Fiscal Cons.
Thompson = lazy (thinks being a former presidential candidate is
good for his acting career...which consists of playing the same
character over and over again)
Guliani = crazy fascist with no guarantee of being a true fiscal
con.
Romney = only one with any serious fiscal cred...and that's
stretching it a bit. But being fiscally conservative doesn't
circumvent his 'ick' factor.
Franklin Harris|1.3.08 @ 11:13PM|#
Romney = only one with any serious fiscal cred...and that's stretching it a bit. But being fiscally conservative doesn't circumvent his 'ick' factor.
Of course, you have to overlook the fact that the health care plan
he instituted in Mass. looks an awful lot like the one Hillary is
running on now.
Jesse Walker|1.3.08 @ 11:18PM|#
I kinda liked that Mitt Romney didn't seem to have an agenda
other than getting elected. It encouraged me that he wasn't some
idealist gunning to change the world, and therefore couldn't
probably care less about what he did in office.
Yeah, I realize that. Intellectually I know we're probably better
off with him than with the Elmer Gantry Slimfast Plan. But I'm
getting my pleasures where I can.
|1.3.08 @ 11:22PM|#
"Mitt Romney represents everything Americans hate about
politicians: the empty man hungry for power and willing to say
anything to get it, the privileged man who thinks he can buy an
election without actually standing for anything."
Amen JW.
And it does not matter if Romney believes in nothing: his
over-the-top promises he is willing to make in his
do-say-anything-to-win madness will be held against him and he will
have to follow through on most of them...
There is an alternative explanation, one I read in the New Yorker
recently: that Mitt, like many salesmen, actually can actually do
repeated position changes and changes on life philosophy and become
an enthusiastic believer in every change. I had a Soc prof who
called such people "seekers" bouncing from one ideology to the
next, sometimes opposite one, but enthusiastically embracing each
one...Now that is frightening...
|1.3.08 @ 11:22PM|#
No, this wasn't a good night for Paul, and I warrant it pretty much rules him out of contention for the nomination if he doesn't win outright in NH, however, it does point that Giuliani is as much as non contestant as Paul and should be out of the race around the same time. Fred will stay to lose in NH, but frankly, I'm just happy that Giuliani won't be our nominee. It would have been a disgrace to the republican party and a disaster for libertarians. While I don't like McCain, I hope he'll emerge from this scruff to take control, because he's mildly acceptable and might have a chance of beating the democrats.
|1.3.08 @ 11:24PM|#
All this talk of uniting behind the "fiscal con." I've always
suspected that many libertarians value the "fiscal con" over the
"social liberal" except when they are at parties and want to get
laid...
Donderdo and his madness notwithstanding, Rudy is the better social
liberal of the GOP pack of "frontrunners."
|1.3.08 @ 11:26PM|#
Franklin Harris,
Of course, you have to overlook the fact that the health care
plan he instituted in Mass. looks an awful lot like the one Hillary
is running on now.
I was wondering if anyone was going to notice that.
FYI, it wasn't his plan. It was a watered-down version of a
compromise plan that came out of the legislature. It's not like
it's Romney's baby.
|1.3.08 @ 11:27PM|#
I'm confused. Is every GOP candidate but Ron Paul a
libertarian Republican?
And Mike Huckabee.
The only similarity I can think of is that they are both
unacceptable to the Republican establishment.
|1.3.08 @ 11:29PM|#
Eric,
So who is the libertarian candidate Romney or Ghouliani? I've
gotten spam less predictable than your post. All your posts look
like below:
A prominent libertarian Republican, the guy who practically put the word "libertarian Republican" on the map, former [ELECTED POSITION] [PERSON], enthusiastically backs [Candidate that's not Ron Paul] and you A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE LIBERTARIAN MOVEMENT [or Reason Magazine], have the audacity to bash ________ [Candidate that's not Ron Paul].
|1.3.08 @ 11:31PM|#
Huckabee belongs to you people--don't know how he's a
Republican, unless religiosity is now the sole criterion for some
voters. Interestingly, he reminds me a little of pre-9/11 Bush,
with all of that socialist conservative talk.
Bah.
|1.3.08 @ 11:32PM|#
No, this wasn't a good night for Paul, and I warrant it
pretty much rules him out of contention for the
nomination
I don't know...on this one I remain hopeful...He's way ahead of
Guliani and a squeaker behind McCain and Thompson. Thompson has no
real fire in the belly and McCain is a love-him-or-hate-him
candidate - which is never good.
That puts Paul somewhat deceptively close I think...but what do I
know...I'm just a crank.
|1.3.08 @ 11:34PM|#
if Huckabee becomes the next POTUS, I am going to just quit my job, move to the middle of nowhere, and drink a lot (until Huckabee outlaws alcohol, or whatever).
|1.3.08 @ 11:37PM|#
Dondero advocates all the other candidates backing a fiscal
conservative in order to defeat Huckabee.
I guess Dondero is finally coming around to support Paul the only
libertarian in the race.
iowan|1.3.08 @ 11:37PM|#
Iowa's practically a theocracy.
Not even close.
Conservative Christians are a very, very well organized and
cohesive group in Iowa. At 60,000 or so, they can swing the
caucuses, but in reality they have little overall impact in the
state.
IA went for Gore over Bush, then Bush over Kerry. We are a purple
state.
|1.3.08 @ 11:37PM|#
Incidentally, with the ever-earlier major primaries and his
large war chest, Giuliani doesn't have to do well early. Wish I
could write him off, but I can't. Still, I don't think he has much
of a chance.
If Paul does anything, it'll be by exceeding expectations early on.
A third-place (or close to it) finish in Iowa coupled with a better
finish in New Hampshire could give him a decent chance. I think
he's hurt by McCain's resurgence, as McCain still catches some of
that "I need an alternative" vote.
Bhh|1.3.08 @ 11:44PM|#
"move to the middle of nowhere, and drink a lot"
Dude I'm way ahead of you. Ghouliani came in like 19th place so
there's something to be happy about.
|1.3.08 @ 11:55PM|#
BTW...Jayhawks won the Orange Bowl for anyone interested. Not a bad game...sadly more interesting than the Iowa caucus.
Franklin Harris|1.3.08 @ 11:56PM|#
Incidentally, with the ever-earlier major primaries and his large war chest, Giuliani doesn't have to do well early. Wish I could write him off, but I can't. Still, I don't think he has much of a chance.
Ghouliani's problem is that Republicans like to pick a horse early,
and Ghouliani is going to go nowhere for weeks while other
candidates get momentum. By the time the primaries in which he
could do well roll around, his pool of possible supporters will
have jumped ship to someone (McCain, Thompson, Romney) who seems to
have momentum. Others have tried Rudy's wait-until-the-big-states
strategy before, but it has never worked. And, contrary to Rudy's
thinking, I don't think the heavily front-loaded schedule makes it
more likely to work.
Franklin Harris|1.3.08 @ 11:58PM|#
Thompson has no real fire in the belly ...
That's Thompson's one good quality: He doesn't lust after the job
like Clinton, Romney, and Edwards do.
But what do I know? I'm another crank, too.
|1.4.08 @ 12:03AM|#
Reinmoose | January 3, 2008, 11:34pm | #
if Huckabee becomes the next POTUS, I am going to just quit my job, move to the middle of nowhere, and drink a lot (until Huckabee outlaws alcohol, or whatever).
According to Google maps, Nowhere, Uninc Caddo County, OK is on
N2550 Rd about 500 ft South of E1280 Rd, just outside Fort Cobb
State Park.
|1.4.08 @ 12:04AM|#
Although for some perspective, my candidate appears to have
finished with 0.04% of the delegates.
That's no way to treat the Next Senate Majority Leader.
|1.4.08 @ 12:09AM|#
That's Thompson's one good quality: He doesn't lust after
the job like Clinton, Romney, and Edwards do.
You know...being that we already have a nominal president who's
pretty much phoned in his presidency for the past 7 years because
he was too stupid to grasp the possibilities inherent in the
job...I don't think I want someone who gonna coast into the office.
It sets a bad precident.
|1.4.08 @ 12:23AM|#
I think I taught Dondero in one of my remedial English
classes.
You ought to be fired.
|1.4.08 @ 12:33AM|#
"Huckabee is almost the polar opposite of everything we
libertarians stand for: He's fiscally liberal, socially
conservative, and weak on Defense.
He's the anti-Goldwater. And now Jesse Walker says nice things
about him."
Take a screenshot Dondero... because I will NEVER say this again:
You are absolutely right about Huckabee. He is the
anti-libertarian, and he is a piss-poor conservative as well.
That said, how about some truth-in-advertising... "we
libertarians"? Don't you actually have to be a libertarian to say
that?
Franklin Harris|1.4.08 @ 12:40AM|#
You know...being that we already have a nominal president who's pretty much phoned in his presidency for the past 7 years because he was too stupid to grasp the possibilities inherent in the job...I don't think I want someone who gonna coast into the office. It sets a bad precident.
But W seemed to think he was entitled to the job in a way Thompson
doesn't.
And I am NOT endorsing Thompson, BTW.
|1.4.08 @ 12:44AM|#
I will vote for Ron Paul in the general election. I will
consider voting for Thompson, and I'd MAYBE vote for McCain (but
his pro-every-damned-war attitude scares me).
The rest of the GOP is useless, and I won't vote for any of
them.
I won't vote for ANY of the Democrats.
|1.4.08 @ 12:53AM|#
Understood, Franklin Harris...but from what I can tell, Thompson not only doesn't feel entitled...he doesn't seem to really want it. Still, I get what you're saying...certainly is a candidate for each of us out there, huh?
|1.4.08 @ 1:27AM|#
I understand the not wanting to vote for the power hungry person for president. However, I know when I interview someone for a job, whether or not they want it and give a damn is one of the factors I look for. If they can't even fake a modicum of interest in the job, why would they care enough to try and do a good job? Seems like the guys that don't care about the job will let others make the decision for him. Sounds like a recipe for the editorial board of the National Review or Rush Limbaugh to run the country.
|1.4.08 @ 1:36AM|#
I think I taught Dondero in one of my remedial English classes.
You ought to be fired.
I...have to agree.
Mark Bahner|1.4.08 @ 1:39AM|#
RTFA next time, kay?
Mr. Dondero is a Giuliani man, correct? So tonight's gotta hurt!
:-)
And far be it from me to ever kick someone when they're down...but
did anyone notice how Ron Paul (a Congressman from an obscure Texas
district) vastly out-polled the G-man (a man with nationwide name
recognition)?
|1.4.08 @ 1:42AM|#
"Iowa's practically a theocracy."
Spoken like someone who has never been to Iowa. Iowa is white -
there is no getting around that.
But as someone who is gay and spends a lot of time in Iowa I can
say Iowans are open minded and accepting individuals and don't
shove their religious beliefs down anyone's throat. Unlike most
southern states. Iowa is many things - theocracy its not.
Eric DonDer0|1.4.08 @ 2:04AM|#
Iowa seens like an accepting state, but it's more likely that the people were just ignorant, thinking to themselves, "yoshi's just another respectable churchgoer." It's not a theocracy, more an oligarchy like the rest of the US, but it's still not very tolerant.
|1.4.08 @ 2:53AM|#
Umm...Huckabee supports ending the income tax and replacing it
with the FairTax. He also has been critical of Bush's foreign
policy and NAFTA.
That's better than one can say for Romney, at least. Or Giuliani.
Or McCain. He's no libertarian, but I wouldn't say that this is a
terrible thing for libertarians.
I think he's better than the other Republican front runners
(barring Paul and maybe Thompson), and I think, because of his more
theocratic stances, he'd lose to Obama, who is a moderate
left-libertarian and would hopefully have his more socialistic
economic stances controlled by the Republicans a la Bill Clinton
circa '94.
Eric Dondero|1.4.08 @ 6:54AM|#
That's not my post above. It's from Paul Frankel, alias "Paulie
Cannoli," or Disinter. He's going around the internet using my name
with the exact same spelling.
Please note that. If a post is silly, over-the-top or outrageous,
chances are it's Frankel posing as me.
Thanks.
Eric Dondero|1.4.08 @ 6:56AM|#
For the record: Mr. Dondero is a Giuliani man, first and a
Romney and Thompson man close second.
Mixed results for me last night. Sucks that Hussein Obama won so
big. Not that I like Hillary. Sucks that Huck-monster won so
big.
But at least Fred Thompson beat McCain, unexpectedly. And he most
beat Ron Paul handidly.
And please don't call me "Mr." It's Eric, thank you.
Eric Dondero|1.4.08 @ 6:59AM|#
Yeah, I guess you do have to be a "libertarian." So, how 'bout
you stop calling yourself that.
I didn't see you standing in the 10 degree weather collecting sigs
for Libertarian Party ballot access in the middle of winter, in the
fields of Western Nebraska.
That's how one gets to call themselves a "real libertarian."
Computer spammers who jam at their keyboards all day, who wouldn't
know a clipboard if it hit them in their asses, is not what I call
"libertarian." Sorry.
Eric Dondero|1.4.08 @ 7:01AM|#
There may be some silver lining for us all in last night's
results.
If Huckabee keeps winning, the anti-libertarian, perhaps it's a
signal that we need to rally behind Wayne Root, Libertarian for
President.
Root was a classmate of Obama's. That'd be an excellent schtick for
the general election.
If Fred, Rudy and Romney lose, we need to think Wayne Root on the
Libertarian side.
That's the beauty of being Libertarian Republican. In the worst of
situations we always have the LP to fall back on.
|1.4.08 @ 8:46AM|#
Please note that. If a post is silly, over-the-top or
outrageous, chances are it's Frankel posing as me.
Um, that's not much help.
|1.4.08 @ 8:56AM|#
"In the worst of situations we always have the LP to fall back
on."
I end up falling back on the LP in every election.
|1.4.08 @ 8:59AM|#
"But at least Fred Thompson beat McCain, unexpectedly. And he
most beat Ron Paul handidly."
Just like Ron Paul beat Guiliani handily.
|1.4.08 @ 9:34AM|#
I have to go to Nebraska in winter to become a "real
libertarian?" WTF? What if I join the Libertarian Party, vote
libertarian every chance I get, or vote for the most libertarian of
the candidate choices, and constantly (yet politely) remind my
Republican and Democrat friends that they actually agree with me,
but they are typically parroting their parents, or parroting the
polar opposite of their parents (depending on their mommy/daddy
issues)?
Sorry, MR. Dondero, I still consider myself both a big and small
"l" libertarian.
I truly hate it when people say, "you haven't done x, therefore you
cannot be y."
You don't know me, you don't know what I've gone through, you don't
know my thought process, nor do you know that I have the word
FREEDOM tattooed across my back (you do know now), so do NOT tell
me or anyone else what they are or are not.
(I also hate too many (parenthesis), so I'm a little agitated at
myself today).
I drove through Nebraska once. I'm probably never going back.
|1.4.08 @ 9:37AM|#
I didn't mean to stray off the topic... Personally, Huckster and Romney both scare me, albeit for different reasons.
Jon Davies|1.4.08 @ 9:49AM|#
Yeah, I guess you do have to be a "libertarian." So, how
'bout you stop calling yourself that.
I didn't see you standing in the 10 degree weather collecting sigs
for Libertarian Party ballot access in the middle of winter, in the
fields of Western Nebraska.
That's how one gets to call themselves a "real
libertarian."
No Dondero. That's how douchebags with creepy moustaches and floppy
tits become unabashed partisans when they realize that they are
irrelevant, unwanted and ineffective.
Please go take your clipboard, fulfill your destiny, and become a
gym teacher.
|1.4.08 @ 9:51AM|#
Huck winning big will only help my boy Thompson's chances. Romney is now likely to lose both Iowa and New Hampshire, effectively putting him out of it. This is going to open up a spot near the top for Thompson. McCain and Huckabee won't get support from real conservatives (TAX CUTTERS). It's going to come down to Fred or Rudi, and I think personal life is going to lose it for Rudy.
|1.4.08 @ 10:44AM|#
Eric Dondero, apparently, used to be quite the
libertarian.
Then "9/11 changed everything."
|1.4.08 @ 11:32AM|#
So Jesse Walker says that he likes Mike Huckabee
I see the evening's events have not improved Eric Dondero's reading comprehension skills.
Which might explain why he thinks people like Giuliani and Tom
Feeney and all the other "libertarians" he namedrops all the time
are libertarians.
|1.4.08 @ 11:54AM|#
Interestingly, he reminds me a little of pre-9/11 Bush, with all of that socialist conservative talk.
My observation is that "christian conservatives" do not have any
problems with most aspects of the welfare state. Their only beef is
that it will end up being run by a bunch of homos and atheists (in
other words - Democrats).
I for one am glad that cultural issues like evolution, sex ed,
abortion and gay marriage keep the religious right and the
religious left from getting together.
The idea of Mike Huckaby, Jimmy Carter, Pat Robertson and Bill
Moyers teaming up to legislate the crap they agree on is truly
scary.
|1.4.08 @ 12:15PM|#
Dondero,
If Huckabee keeps winning, the anti-libertarian, perhaps it's a
signal that we need to rally behind Wayne Root, Libertarian for
President.
That's the beauty of being Libertarian Republican. In the worst of
situations we always have the LP to fall back on.
Then there's a libertarian Republican to rally behind, not neocon
Giuliani or hawk McCain.
You've been trying for the last year to draw the anti-establishment
vote away from Paul. It didn't go to establishment neocon Giuliani,
it went to outside the mainstream Huckabee.
Huckabee's victory is your victory Dondero. You made your bed, now
sleep with Huckabee.
|1.4.08 @ 12:36PM|#
For anyone who expressed this view, or something similar:
"Paul needs to beat real candidates in New Hampshire or he's a
sideshow freak for the rest of the campaign. Bad night for Paul.
Sorry."
I live in New Hampshire.
Paul campaigned less in Iowa than Rudy, John, or Fred.
Paul also has more money than Rudy, John, or Fred.
New Hamsphire is also more libertarian than Iowa.
Anyone who thinks Ron Paul can't beat more candidates in NH than in
IA doesn't live in NH.
|1.4.08 @ 12:38PM|#
Jan,
I wrote that, and I agree. New Hampshire is much more fertile
territory for Paul than Iowa.
Which is why I think it is a make-or-break state for him.
|1.4.08 @ 2:56PM|#
The Huckster supports getting rid of the IRS and replacing the
income tax with a national sales tax. That at least seems like a
nudge in the libertarian direction.
Go Jesus Man!
economist|1.4.08 @ 3:33PM|#
Mufffy
There is no way in hell that Congress would actually replace the
income tax with a sales tax. A flat rate income tax is a little too
good to be true. If we get a national sales tax, it will be in
addition to all our other taxes (kind of like in Arkansas under
Huckabee).
Nick Mockiavelli|1.4.08 @ 4:56PM|#
Top 10 Reasons Huck Will Pick Chuck As His VP!
http://www.voterswrite.org/2008/01/top-10-reasons.html
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245