Kerry Howley | December 11, 2007
Will no government agency regulate the thickness of sliced bread in Britain?
The House of Lords has been listening with interest to a call for thick slices of bread to be cut down to size.
Baroness Gardener said: "I speak as a member of the All-Party Group on Obesity. Why is it that in central London you can hardly find a thinly sliced or medium-sliced load of bread to buy, and any sandwich you buy in any supermarket is now made with thick bread?
"While the House of Lords continues to use medium-sliced bread - and very nice bread - in its sandwiches, even the House of Commons has moved to thick bread.
"Surely at a time when we want to reduce people's consumption, there should be more pressure from the Food Standards Agency, or one of the many departments the Minister speaks about, to take us back to normal-sized bread instead of these super-sized sandwiches."
Via Kip Esquire.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
If the House of Lords doesn't like the thickness of their sliced bread, they can just move somewhere else.
Surely at a time when we want to reduce
people's consumption...
There's that word again!
ok, in my above post it's not as clear as maybe it should be, so the word referenced is "we."
It's funny because a Baroness wants to control the personal eating habits of the peasants.
Baroness:
Step 1: Buy unsliced loaf of bread.
Step 2: Pick up serrated knife.
Step 3: ????????
Step 4: PROFIT!
The Earl brings up two interesting questions (at least to
me):
1. Is there a current Earl of Sandwich?
2. Is he in the House of Lords?
wikipedia provides:
As of 2007 the titles are held by his eldest son, the eleventh
Earl, who succeeded in 1995. Lord Sandwich is one of the ninety
elected hereditary peers that remain in the House of Lords after
the passing of the House of Lords Act 1999, and sits as a
cross-bencher.
The answer is quite simple. Thinly sliced bread does not absorb enough lard to be considered a proper item on an English sammich.
It's funny because a Baroness wants to control the personal eating habits of the peasants.
And because she evidently wants to put the peasants on Atkins.
Ah Jeez-Louise, a "cross-bencher"! Among the upper crust even! My word.
Baroness Gardener said: "I speak as a member of the
All-Party Group on Obesity. Why is it that in central London you
can hardly find a thinly sliced or medium-sliced load of bread to
buy, and any sandwich you buy in any supermarket is now made with
thick bread?
Get a job, you useless parasite!
I blame the Scottish sword ban. People simply cannot make their thick slices any thinner!
You know, now that you mentioned it, I've noticed the french fries over here appear to be much longer than they used to was.
Baroness Gardener said: "I speak as a member of the
All-Party Group on Obesity. Why is it that in central London you
can hardly find a thinly sliced or medium-sliced load of bread to
buy, and any sandwich you buy in any supermarket is now made with
thick bread?
The Baroness continued: "I, personally, have never been to a
supermarket. But this is what I've been told from very reliable
sources. Some of my sources have even eaten one of those
sandwiches."
This is proof that English liberty is toast!
We're on the same facist path, I wonder if Americans will be
equally cowardly ninnies, or if we'll have another tea party. I
vote tea party. Soon.
And now they're dredging up the cross-bencher thing?
Look, it was my experimental phase, and I was very drunk. . .
Wait a minute, I don't have to explain myself to a commoner!
I wonder if Americans will be equally cowardly ninnies, or
if we'll have another tea party. I vote tea party.
Out: tea parties
In: All-Party Group on Obesity
I hate it when Rush Limbaugh is right about
something.
See? I told you so!
Oops!
I hate it when Rush Limbaugh is right about
something.
Even a blind pig ...
Full disclosure - I used to listen to him while commuting. He can
be funny, but he's morphed into a Republican party shill.
"I speak as a member of the All-Party Group on Obesity. Why
is it that in central London you can hardly find a thinly sliced or
medium-sliced load of bread to buy, and any sandwich you buy in any
supermarket is now made with thick bread?"
Because people have shown a preference for buying thickly sliced
bread? Nah, that couldn't be it. Must be a supermarkets and bread
consortium demanding fewer slices per loaf to trick people into
buying more loaves at the expense of their health.
I was gonna make some comment about 1776 and "Up the rebels! Down the British!" but then I read LibertyPlease's 2:19 comment and got nauseous.
NoStar | December 11, 2007, 2:10pm | #
This is proof that English liberty is toast!
We need a ruling. Does this win the thread? Or lose it?
I'm partial to NoStar's views in general, so I'd declare at least a tie with Wiki calling someone a "Cross-bencher". In a perfect world, what one does with their own ass is their own business, but the term reeks of hilarity on it's face.
I was gonna make some comment about 1776 and "Up the rebels! Down the British!" but then I read LibertyPlease's 2:19 comment and got nauseous.
Ninnies it is :-)
I used to listen to him while commuting. He can be funny,
but he's morphed into a Republican party shill.
And he's remained largely unchanged since 1994.
What does this do to my right as an Englishman to unsliced
bread?
Doesn't this violate the second law of thermodynamics?
Good bread has a surprisingly large amount of calories. Half the sandwich's calories can be in the two slices...
Re: Tea party. Another Tea Party is coming on December 16:
http://www.teaparty07.com/
-----
I'm partial to NoStar's views in general
Other Matt,
Those words have been foreign to my ears for over 50 years, but
things are changing. In 1988, I knew most everyone who voted for
Ron Paul in the State of Washington. Today, it is impossible to
keep track of all of his supporters in my hometown.
But, think of the bureaucrats, man. There's patronage and
dollars to be made!
First, we'll need to hire inspectors to raid bakeries with a set of
rulers to make sure that no slice is thicker than 2cm, and slap 200
pound fines on the scallywags who try to meet market demands.
Those bloody free-thinking obesity peddling anarchists.
Well isn't thick bread one of the causes of global warming? Since fat people use more fossil fuels to drive their fat asses around town, since they can't walk or bike. Wait, let me check my copy of Earth in the Balance....I'll get back to you. Feel free to nominate me for a Nobel in the meantime.
I can see em now in the back alleys talkin through the peephole
in the door.
"Gimme a couple slabs of thick sliced bread and a chubby
chaser"
Silly, but isn't nice to live in a century where the greatest threats are things like thick bread and hand full of Islamist nuts, instead of the Black Death and the Mongol Hordes.
So if I find my bread to be sliced too thin, can't I just use
two slices on each side of the sandwich?
The Baroness, being an aristocrat and of superior breeding, is
clearly far more intelligent than me.
If you eat too much meat, you can't have any bread pudding!
What's wrong with us, anyway? Back when men were free, they sliced their own danged bread. With the daggers that God meant them to have. All this talk of how thickly bread should be sliced by state-regulated bread slicers just demonstrates our accelerating slide into decadence. I'm sickened.
Even worse, BACK ALLEY BREADSLICERS!
Keep sandwiches safe and legal!
No, no, no, no this....look, look, look, there's a little problem with the... look this, this miniature bread. It's like...I've been working with this now for about half an hour. I can't figure out...
Interestingly, the actor who portrayed Nigel Tufnel was Christopher Haden-Guest. Yes, that would be the Baron Haden-Guest! Who slices his bread? Other than Lady Haden-Guest, when she's not insulting Kevin Kline or baring her assets for Dan Aykroyd. Or screaming.
Even worse, BACK ALLEY BREADSLICERS!
I imagine it's quite difficult to slice bread with a
coathanger.
...instead of the Black Death and the Mongol
Hordes.
I dunno, some of those Mongol Hordean
women were really hot!
Any way you slice it, here's always be an England:
"Mr. Limbkins, I beg your pardon, sir! Oliver Twist has asked for more!"
There was a general start. Horror was depicted on every countenance.
"For more!" said Mr. Limbkins. "Compose yourself, Bumble, and answer me distinctly. Do I understand that he asked for more, after he had eaten the supper allotted by the dietary?"
"He did, sir," replied Bumble.
"That boy will be hung," said the gentleman in the white waistcoat. "I know that boy will be hung."
Lord Sandwich is one of the ninety elected
hereditary peers that remain in the House of
Lords
Am I the only one struggling with the idea of an elected hereditary
office?
This idiocy has a history that goes back hundreds of years. I'm working on a piece that discusses (among other things) assizes of bread in England and the U.S.
R C-
As oxymoronic as an "elected hereditary" peer may sound, IIRC when
the House of Lords got rid of most hereditary peers they voted on
which ones to retain.
This was supposed to be step 1 toward a House chosen in some manner
more sensible than a mix of Prime Minister appointments and
hereditary seats. But no progress so far on step 2.
Wasn't Jean Valjean convicted for stealing bread? I wonder if it was thickly sliced?
"Bring out your obese!...Bring out your obese!
"But I'm not obese yet!"
"Well- you soon will be!"
"No, I won't...I only weigh 145 pounds."
A sure sign of the decline of the Empire:
Bread crusts left on the Baroness' cucumber sandwiches.
Don't you get it, this is really pro-freedom? I mean when a
fellow can't even get thinly sliced bread anymore, things are dire
indeed.
I told them that the house of lords provided a necessary restraint
on the frivolous house of commons back in '99; Did they listen?
No!
FUCK OFF, I LOVE KINGSMILL MALTED THICK GRAIN
oh and the principal of individual rights
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245