Nick Gillespie | September 6, 2007
Slate's media critic Jack Shafer should be required reading at all j-schools. His col on the Boston Globe's phoney-baloney girl/girl attack story is yet another example of the benefits of close reading:
The sixth or seventh paragraph of a bogus trend story usually contains the seed of its own destruction, but only rarely does a such trend story announce its bogusity in the subhead, as does a piece in today's (Sept. 4) Boston Globe.
"Vicious Attacks By Girl Cliques Seen Increasing," reads the piece's headline. The subhead-"Despite Police Statistics, Violence Causing Worries"-all but cancels the assertion of an increase in girl-on-girl violence. Indeed, the story's sixth paragraph cites Boston police statistics that show a decline in aggravated assaults by girls, ages 14 to 19.
Shafer uncharatertistically got mushy over H.L. Mencken in reason here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245