Nick Gillespie | August 27, 2007
As
Gonzo
deserts the sinking ship that is the SS Bush Second Term, there's
no question that he sucked as attorney general.
But was he in fact worse than Constitution-shredder and recidivist barbershop quarteter John Ashcroft (whose main qualification for the gig was losing to a dead man in an election)?
Or Constitution-shredder and recidivist child abuser Janet Reno (whose main qualification for the gig was that she never paid a nanny under the table)?
Discuss. And ponder the thought that whatever comes next might actually be worse.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Is this the wrong time to pull out my "Meese in '88"
t-shirt?
Christ - I've just lost track of all the suckiness.
While Ashcroft shredded the constitution, it's pretty clear that
Gonzalez was egging him on at the time, and that Gonzo got pissed
off at him for going slow.
Reno was her own freak show, but she was saved the disgrace of
really getting super-shreddy just by being out of office by
9/11/01. However, she did all her shredding in an environment where
there was no excuse for it. I at least understand how the 9/11
attacks could push you over the edge and make you do things that
you wouldn't have done (even if deep down you wanted to) before
hand. She did all her shit when the worst crisis we faced was
"irrational exuberance" in the stock market and maybe some
espionage on the part of the Pets.com sock puppet.
Here is a depressing thought about our three most recent
Attorneys General. Do we look back to the AG tenure of Edwin Meese,
or Ramsey Clark, as the good old days?
Another depressing thought. It still is a good thing Alberto
Gonzales became AG, because we were spared him being picked for the
Supreme Court.
I need to call my doctor for a Zoloft prescription.
The ACLU just named (Alexander) Mitchell Palmer, Wilson's AG, as
a moral ancestor to this one. Interesting fellow:
"tongues of revolutionary heat were licking the alters (sic) of the
churches, leaping into the belfry of the school-bell, crawling into
the sacred corners of American homes, seeking to replace marriage
laws with libertine vows, burning up the foundations of
society."
And: anarchists-or-possibly-communists blew up his D.C. home.
And: he deported Emma Goldman! To the Soviet Union!
Would that be sucked as in "Nick G. sucks as a columnist" or as in Monica L. sucks a mean joint"?
Gonzales was a clown, little more. His jobs was to take the
attention away from all the other gross incompetence, negligence,
greed, practice of evil, etc, of the administration. His leaving
will make no difference.
He will be replaced by a carbon copy with a slightly different
skinbag and ID tag who will promise a New Era of Accountability and
the act in the same manner Alberto did, but he won't have to resign
because Bush will be out before it can come to a head.
It got a little too hot to keep Gonzales around, but he did his job
well, pushing whatever swill he was told to push, shitting on the
bill of rights, wiping his ass with the Geneva Convention, and
serving as a lightning rod for criticism for many years. Nothing
will change. Nothing.
Waco was more Louis Freeh's responsibility than Janet
Reno's.
For a new Attorney General to defer to the longtime head of the FBI
when he says it's time to end an armed standoff strikes me as a
reasonable action to take.
This guy not recent enough for you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_N._Mitchell ?
...and people kept saying to me, "Cheer up! Things could be worse." So, I cheered up, and sure enough...
To echo foobar a little bit, I recall cheering as the door
smacked SpongejJohn SquareAshcroft in the ass on his way out the
door.
He was replaced by an even less principled and unqualified
sycophantic stooge. I have no reason to believe that there will be
any difference in Gonzo's departure.
The one good thing I can say about Ashcroft is that (at least as a Senator) he was good on strong crypto. Or, at least as good as you can get in DC.
Thanks for the link Syd.
Again it makes me ask, If the Republicans like Reagan so much, why
are they trying to be like Nixon?
Best ever? Were there any good ones that weren't puppets for the President or shills for rights-deniers? I thought maybe AG Brownell under Eisenhower in 1957,but it appears Ike had to over-rule him, federalize the Ark. National Guard and then send in the 101st Airborne to Little Rock to enforce desgregation orders that Gov. Faubus was ignoring.
Janet Reno stood by and did nothing as the FBI and ATF obstructed justice in the investigation of the Ruby Ridge fiasco. She fully supported the means by which Elian Gonzalez was sent back to Cuba; a search warrant was obtained by making knowingly false statements to a compliant magistrate, so as to shorten a legal dispute by illegitimate force.
I think Reno was the worse, because she let Waco happen. If she let that much carnegie happen in response to unregistered guns, I can only imagine how she would have responded to today's scares.
Best Attorney General. Well, there's William Barr, who held the
post for two years under Bush41 and who I don't remember a thing
about, which is a definite improvement over the last three. Then
there's William French Smith, who I also don't remember at all.
(Ross Perot said if he was elected he wanted to appoint Smith to
his cabinet. Someone pointed out to Perot that Smith was
dead.)
Griffin Bell seems to have been pretty good, but Elliot Richardson
is the one I'll always admire.
"whose main qualification for the gig was losing to a dead man
in an election)?"
Yeah, never mind his actual qualifications, like the fact he was an
assistant attorney general and attorney general in Missouri, among
other qualifications
If I had a nickel for every time Reason writers
should have stuck to actual facts concerning a person's record
rather than resorting to personal smears, I would be wealthy enough
to make Warren Buffett look like Oliver Twist.
Actually this is a pretty good libertarian litmus test.
Considering the breadth and width that federal law has stretched
into unconstitutional areas is it even possible to like any
attorney general in living memory and still seriously be considered
a libertarian?
anyway that said i have to say i liked Gonzales the most....and only because he is the son of a migrant worker...really nothing more then that.
A nominate Meese. In addition to just being bad, he looked like a dumb, pious, self righteous jerk; sort of like Jerry Falwell, may he rest in peace.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245