Ronald Bailey | August 23, 2007
In the midst of the summer TV doldrums, I accidently tuned in last night to the new game show, The Power of 10 (turn audio down) where I was pleasantly surprised to learn that 82 percent of Americans apparently told pollsters that they would prefer to be smart and ugly rather than good-looking and dumb.
Anyway, a new study by British researchers finds that women don't go for guys with excessively masculine features--they judge them too prone to procreate and run. The press release for the report states:
Women see 'masculine' men as unsuitable long-term partners, according to research from the Universities of St Andrews and Durham.
Conversely, the psychologists found that men with feminine facial features are seen as more committed and less likely to cheat on their partners.
The study, which is published in the current edition of Personality and Individual Differences, asked over 400 British men and women to judge digitally altered pictures of male faces made to look more masculine or feminine. The participants were asked to predict personality traits including sexual behaviour and parenting skills based on what they saw.
Men with masculine faces, with features such as a square jaw, larger nose and smaller eyes, were classed as significantly more dominant, less faithful and made worse parents than feminine-featured males. They were also thought to have personalities that were less warm when compared to their `feminine' counterparts, who had finer facial features with fuller lips, wide eyes and thinner, more curved eyebrows. The scientists say it gives further insight into what people see in others when choosing potential partners.
Whole release here.
Kudos to an anonymous St. Andrews alum for the link.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
"Anyway, a new study by British researchers"
C'mon....Everybody knows that American girls are self-loathing
size queens.
By the way, Emily Flake might just be my favorite
cartoonist person in the world.
So basically, women's biological predisposition is to screw the masculine-looking guy and then trick the feminine-looking guy into raising the kid.
This is funny, I just heard that a study recently came out suggesting that women prefer men with the cro-magnon set of features (short forehead, wide nose, etc.) to be most attractive. Brad Pitt and Will Smith were given as examples.
Gahan
Absolutely - remember "The Breakfast Club"? all the chix went off
with the d00dz, leaving the nerd to write the essay.
(But Mr. Gahan, I liked your early-to-mid look with Depeche Mode.
The Music for the Masses onwards, not so much. great voice,
tho!)
"So basically, women's biological predisposition is to screw
the masculine-looking guy and then trick the feminine-looking guy
into raising the kid."
Marriage exists to counteract this phenomenon.
"So basically, women's biological predisposition is to screw
the masculine-looking guy and then trick the feminine-looking guy
into raising the kid."
Marriage exists to counteract this phenomenon.
Or to institutionalize this phenomenon.
Gahan,
I'd like to know how many examples there are of single mothers
marrying feminine looking guys later. I don't think there's a
plethora of them out there. While I agree that an unschooled woman
might be more likely early on to go out and screw the manly men,
that's not to say that they're genetically predisposed to make the
second choicers raise the unintended offspring, atleast not the
intelligent women.
Yeah, ask all the divorced guys out there shelling out thousands a year in support for kids that are proven to not be theirs.
VM,
Wish I could take the credit, but I'm actually named for cartoonist
Gahan Wilson. His stuff is in Playboy and the New Yorker (don't ask
me which one my parents subscribed to).
Gahan -
still a pretty cool namesake!
Why not subscribe to both? Since both are thumbed through magazines
where nobody really reads the articles! (grins)
that's not to say that they're genetically predisposed to
make the second choicers raise the unintended offspring
Your first choice to donate genes to your offspring and your first
choice to raise that offspring don't necessarily have to be the
same person.
Females show a greater preference for "male" faces just when they
are ovulating.
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/10905138/2000/00000021/00000001/art00033
Utter bullshit!
Where to these Commies come up with this stuff? It reminds of a
faghag's poem where she says the perfect man is gay!
"There's no need to fear; Underzog is here!" (and don't forget the
"Underdog" movie)
Females show a greater preference for "male" faces just when they are ovulating
RUSH INTERVIEW WITH OVULATING MALE FACE
Lost,
I don't know how many examples there are either.
I was simply drawing a conclusion from what this particular study
suggests. Another scenario would be that the woman marries the
feminine guy to begin with and is later unfaithful. At any rate,
what people are genetically predisposed to do and what they
actually do aren't necessarily the same thing. I didn't mean to
suggest that this sort of behavior is in any way typical of
women.
While I agree that an unschooled woman might be more likely early on to go out and screw the manly men, that's not to say that they're genetically predisposed to make the second choicers raise the unintended offspring, atleast not the intelligent women.
My experience has been that intelligent women can be equally
promiscuous. Something probably does drive the promiscuity,
probably the same 'thing' that drives the drama.
RUSH INTERVIEW WITH OVULATING MALE FACE
FOX would love it! They could run it right after the expose on the
grammar police!
Regardless of what genetics predispose women too, did the
scientiss research whether any of the nerds from "Revenge of the
Nerds" ever have a chance in hell of getting laid by a decent
girl?
Inquiring minds want to know!!!
Or maybe it means they have fun with the manly men and when they
settle down they pick the girly men. Since when is what women say
they want and what they actually go for the same thing*.
* Also true, though to a lesser extent, for men. Men are pretty
shameless about wanting a nice rack/ass to play with.
David Bowie is somehow behind this
Sean,
That's impossible: Bowie's in
space.
Or the MOZ!!!
This is pretty
butch (SFW). Besides he doesn't really look all that girly:
square jaw, heavy eyebrows, etc.
Where to these Commies come up with this stuff?
i believe they prefer the term Communist-American.
Maybe English women.
American women prefer muscles
http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSN0929084520070710?feedType=RSS
I believe that approximately 10% of American birth certificates do not accurately name the father.
This is a common finding in Evolutionary Psychology, but it
appears to be only true of English women. US samples, at least, do
NOT show this effect. I personally ran a study with 150 males and
had their faces rated by women for attractiveness. The correlation
between physical strength and physical attractiveness of the face
was over .4 and positive. The correlation is even higher if you
have women rate the man's body on attractiveness.
I'm sorry, academics, women do like strong guys!
"I believe that approximately 10% of American birth certificates
do not accurately name the father."
Which explains the existence of the Maury Polvich show.
The good news is, it's much easier to exercise than to become smart. According to my favorite infomercials, you can get ripped abs in just 20 mins a day....
Note to fertile women,
Go ahead and procreate with the macho guys if you want, but be
aware that we femmy guys are too busy ironing our jeans and
fellating each other to raise your children.
Sorry.
i believe they prefer the term
Communist-American.
If the PC types use the french type phraseology of people of
color, then they would probably prefer the term Communists of
America.
"There's no need to fear; Underzog is here!"
The good news for "masculine" men is that this mostly applies
for "relationships."
When it comes to F-ing, the chicks go for the manly man. And
chances are, when she's married or cohabitating with the
feminine-faced man, she will be trying to have me bang her on the
side.
When we masculine-men want a "relationship" we can simply
impregnate a chick and choose to make one.
Women want wimps for long term companions and manly men for a
fling. Biology
trumps psychology sometimes, as ovulating women find masculine men
more attractive.
So when they are thinking rationally, they prefer men they think
they will be able to push around, I guess.
Women, I've been told, don't care if you're bald, fat, or
hairy.
As long as you're rich.
All you can really conclude from these surveys is what those people who answered them were thinking at the time they answered. Ask the same group the same questions in two weeks and get a completely opposite result.
If this is true Then why aren't men more feminine looking as a
whole?
Wouldn't evolution select against masculine looking men?
Might it be true that this study might reveal little more than a
general bias against masculine looking men? The manliest looking
dudes in film, tv,etc., are always the bad guys...
I suggest to you all the we're conditioned to fear manly men from
early on..
Recently, in my workplace, one of the younger women got involved with a rather effeminate looking intern. When this guy first arrived (before they hooked up), he went around the local bar we frequented trying to make bets on when he would have her bedded (after she had left for the night, of course). So, she was just a convenient piece of tail for him. Judging someone's personality and ethics by the way they look does not get you good results.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245