David Weigel | July 13, 2007
I'm one of the pundits in this week's 30-minutes-ish America's Future Foundation podcast, alongside Amanda Carpenter and my accidental archfoe James Kirchick. Topics:
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
"I'm one of the pundits in this week's 30-minutes-ish America's
Future Foundation podcast"
What? They couldn't get Gary Coleman?
and my accidental archfoe James Kirchick.
I wonder what Weigel's intentional archfoe would look like?
THE URKOBOLD FINDS WARREN'S CONSTANT HARPING ON THE LOBSTER GIRL
TO BE COMPLETELY APPROPRIATE AND, FRANKLY, REFRESHING LIKE A FRESCA
AND AWARDS HIM. . .
A COOKIE!
UM, THE URKOBOLD SEEMS TO BE SHORT. HIGHNUMBER, GIVE WARREN YOUR
COOKIE.
ohnoes!
hopefully not an M&M from D.A.R..
He gave me a green one.(hier is what
happens...(
I hate it when I get those dam little crawly EarWeigels inside
my ears.
[shudders involuntarily]
Wasn't there a movie where they tortured the guy by putting
EarWeigels in his ears?
M&M's from DAR........
I told you they were smart pills and apparently you have gotten
smarter already, thus realizing that they are in fact rabbit
pellets.
Weigel took a long time explaining why we should ignore Iran's
attacks on American troops in Iraq....it had something to do with
the Rome spending lots of money killing Germans 2000 years
ago.
Anyway, kidding aside, i would like it if Weigel would articulate
this a bit more clearly.
How do we stop Iran from attacking American troops in Iraq?
In the podcast i kept expecting him say "Leave Iraq so there is
nothing for Iran to attack" but he never did and i really am
wondering if he just didn't articulate that view very well or if
there is something else there he was talking about.
it had something to do with the Rome spending lots of money
killing Germans 2000 years ago.
I was pointing out that overreacting and responding to every pesky
external enemy with brutal force was the downfall of every empire.
Phrased like that it's a bit more succinct.
In the podcast i kept expecting him say "Leave Iraq so there is
nothing for Iran to attack" but he never did and i really am
wondering if he just didn't articulate that view very well or if
there is something else there he was talking about.
No, you're right, that would have been a good point to make more
bluntly. I sort of danced around with it with my allegories.
Thanks for the constructive criticism. Unless they fire me I'm
doing this every 4 weeks, more if they need someone to sub in.
How do we stop Iran from attacking American troops in
Iraq?
We don't need to. We need to stop Saudi Arabia from
attacking American troops in Iraq.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-saudi15jul15,0,3132262.story?coll=la-home-center
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245