Reason Magazine
- reason.com
- reason.tv
- reason.org
- Donate
- Site Search:
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsadvertisements
Turn on C-Span 2
And watch Robert Byrd give a long speech about the fact that he is old.
If this post doesn't make sense now, surely someone will upload a video later and I'll link to it. It's... beautiful. In response to articles about how old (88) he is, Byrd is lecturing senators on how age should be respected. There was a great section on how "we see white hair on TV but it is often made up" but I may have dreamt that in a haze of giddyness.
|6.28.07 @ 11:48AM|#
Too bad he's not lying with Strom Thurmond.
He's a democrat. Who cares that he used to be a Klan member?
|6.28.07 @ 12:00PM|#
Is he insisting that the term fillibuster be changed to "doing a Byrd"? Or maybe to change the name of his state to West Byrdginia.
|6.28.07 @ 12:02PM|#
I like Whittaker Chambers.
Lots of people had conversion experiences from the CP to the far
right, but his ability allow humanity and decency to moderate his
convert-fanaticism back to a humane liberalism in his later years
speaks very highly of his character and intellect.
|6.28.07 @ 12:08PM|#
Byrd looks like he stepped out of the grave to take a piss. The shortest straw in the intern pool gets to change his diaper, what?
Derrick|6.28.07 @ 12:09PM|#
I used to live in WV. *Everything* is named after Robert Byrd. He is the king of bringing wasteful pork projects back to his state. For example, down the road from me was a federal facility which existed to research the reproductive habits of a particular species of fruit fly. I shit you not.
ed|6.28.07 @ 12:20PM|#
Is he insisting that the term fillibuster be changed to
"doing a Byrd"?
I believe the correct expression is: "Flipping the Byrd."
|6.28.07 @ 12:27PM|#
Despite the fact hes the biggest pork pimp in the universe, he still gets a little more respect from me for the fact that during the "gung ho lets kill them ayrabs n take out motherfuckin saddam!" days in late 2002, he was a voice of sanity.
|6.28.07 @ 12:33PM|#
"he still gets a little more respect from me for the fact
that during the "gung ho lets kill them ayrabs n take out
motherfuckin saddam!" days in late 2002, he was a voice of
sanity"
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day...
|6.28.07 @ 12:38PM|#
joe, there are a lot of people I like who I wouldn't want to be a Senator. My favorite bartender, for instance. Somebody, no matter how young, who was willing to be a communist or a klansman fits the bill, no matter how much I like them now.
|6.28.07 @ 12:45PM|#
Harry Truman was once in the Klan, and he turned out OK.
Back in the 20s and 30s, being a Communist was a common phase that
people went through. It's not as though the people doing so in that
era knew what we know about the Red Terror and whatnot.
|6.28.07 @ 12:50PM|#
Hugo Black was in the Klan, too.
West Virginia: Byrd, Byrd, Byrd, Byrd is the word.
|6.28.07 @ 12:51PM|#
There was a great section on how "we see white hair on TV
but it is often made up"
Did he talk about snow on the roof and fire in the furnace?
|6.28.07 @ 12:58PM|#
Harry Truman was once in the Klan
Bullshit
Back in the 20s and 30s, being a Communist was a common phase
that people went through. It's not as though the people doing so in
that era knew what we know about the Red Terror and
whatnot.
So??????????????????????????????????
They knew it was collectivism. Anyone that ever had a kind word for
Communism is not fit to serve in Government, period.
|6.28.07 @ 12:59PM|#
Well, joe, I wouldn't have voted for Truman for Senate. Sure, he was far from our worst President, but I'm sure there were people who would have been no worse, and never joined the klan, just as there were people who could have been non-horrible politicians without ever demonstrating such bad judgement as buying the hogwash being peddled by the communists. No filtering mechanism is perfect, and bypassing ex klansmen and communists is not too bad.
|6.28.07 @ 1:01PM|#
I just accepted joe's characterization of Truman's past at face value. It certainly wouldn't shock me if it were true, but I apologize to the memory of ol' Harry if it was not the case.
wingnutx|6.28.07 @ 1:03PM|#
PJ O'Rourke was a communist, but he certainly seems to have learned his lesson.
|6.28.07 @ 1:05PM|#
The wikipedia version of Truman's history with the Klan:
Harry Truman
In 1924, Harry Truman was a judge in Jackson County, Missouri,
which includes Kansas City. Truman was up for reelection, and his
friends Edgar Hinde and Spencer Salisbury advised him to join the
Klan. The Klan was politically powerful in Jackson County, and two
of Truman's opponents in the Democratic primary had Klan support.
Truman refused at first, but paid the Klan's $10 membership fee,
and a meeting with a Klan officer was arranged.[1] According to
Salisbury's version of the story, Truman was inducted, but
afterward "was never active; he was just a member who wouldn't do
anything". Salisbury, however, became Truman's bitter enemy in
later years, so this version is suspect.[2] According to Hinde and
Truman's accounts, the Klan officer demanded that Truman pledge not
to hire any Catholics or Jews if he was reelected. Truman refused,
and demanded the return of his $10 membership fee; most of the men
he had commanded in World War I had been local Irish Catholics.[3]
Truman had at least one other strong reason to object to the
anti-Catholic requirement, which was that the Catholic Pendergast
family, which operated a political machine in Jackson County, were
his patrons; Pendergast family lore has it that Truman was
originally accepted for patronage without even meeting him, on the
basis of his family background plus the requirement that he was not
a member of any anti-Catholic organization such as the Klan.[4] The
Pendergast faction of the Democratic Party was known as the
"Goats", as opposed to the rival Shannon machine's "Rabbits". The
battle lines were drawn when Truman put only Goats on the county
payroll,[5] and the Klan began encouraging voters to support
Protestant, "100% American" candidates, which was anathema to the
Catholic Pendergasts. The Klan allied itself against Truman and
with the Rabbits, and Shannon instructed his people to vote
Republican in the election, which Truman lost.[6] Truman later
claimed that the Klan "threatened to kill me, and I went out to one
of their meetings and dared them to try", speculating that if
Truman's armed friends had shown up earlier, violence might have
resulted. However, biographer Alonzo Hamby believes that this
story, which is not supported by any recorded facts, was a
confabulation based on a meeting with a hostile and menacing group
of Democrats that contained many Klansmen, showing Truman's "Walter
Mitty-like tendency […] to rewrite his personal history".[7]
Sympathetic observers see Truman's flirtation with the Klan as a
momentary aberration and point out that his close friend and
business partner Eddie Jacobson was Jewish, and assert that in
later years, Truman's presidency marked the first significant
improvement in the federal government's record on civil rights
since the post-Reconstruction nadir marked by the Wilson
administration.[8] It is also possible to interpret it as a young
politician's opportunistic attempt to get ahead. The incident was
clearly entwined with the intricacies of machine politics, and may
also be seen as an indication of Truman's long evolution in his
outlook on race relations.
Bullshit yourself, Warren.
|6.28.07 @ 1:15PM|#
Truman was a book member of the Klan, not "in the Klan". He was a pandering politician and apparently not an active racist. Which fits about right for him anyway.
|6.28.07 @ 1:17PM|#
joe,
Don't know what page you got that from, but here's what Wikipedia
has on the Harry S. Truman page:
In 1922, Truman gave a friend $10 for an initiation fee for the
Ku Klux Klan but later asked to get his money back; he was never
initiated, never attended a meeting, and never claimed
membership.[27] Though Truman at times expressed anger towards Jews
in his diaries, his business partner and close friend Edward
Jacobson was Jewish.[28] Truman's attitudes toward blacks were
typical of white Missourians of his era, and were expressed in his
casual use of terms like "nigger". Years later, another measure of
his racial attitudes would come to the forefront: tales of the
abuse, violence, and persecution suffered by many African-American
veterans upon their return from World War II infuriated Truman, and
were a major factor in his decision to back civil rights
initiatives and desegregate the armed forces.
Even if we take your version as true (and that is a major
concession I make only for the sake of argument) it's still
bullshit to claim he 'was in the Klan' given his refusal to
participate.
|6.28.07 @ 1:18PM|#
I think joe's right about Truman, Warren. That's certainly my
recollection. And Hugo Black (the very pro-free speech justice)
was, too.
I'd have trouble electing someone with that in his past, too,
though I can't say that anything too awful came from Black and
Truman being in national office. Byrd is another story.
|6.28.07 @ 1:23PM|#
Warren,
I got it from the Klan page, which I found by typing "Harry Truman
Klan" into google and clicking on the first wikipedia link.
But be that as it may, I'm sure the "Byrd was in the Klan!" shots
would continue in exactly the same manner from Republican trolls if
his history had been exactly the same as Truman's. Which I was
right about. As my longer, more detailed link proves.
I wouldn't vote of a guy who had recently been in the Klan or the
Communist Party, either. On the other hand, people convert. If he
had a good number of years behind him and had renounced his former
beliefs, I'd consider giving him a second chance.
|6.28.07 @ 1:31PM|#
Which I was right about. As my longer, more detailed link
proves.
Did you even read what you posted? Or are you just demonstrating
again that there's nothing you won't say in defense of some
previously uttered stupidity?
|6.28.07 @ 1:32PM|#
...in that era knew what we know about the Red Terror and
whatnot.
In his era, Sen. Byrd surely must have known what the KKK was
about.
|6.28.07 @ 1:41PM|#
I'm sure there are former armed robbers who have reformed themselves. I wouldn't help elect one to the Senate, no matter how many years had passed, and no, joining the Klan or becoming a communist isn't quite as bad as committing armed robbery (although it ain't a whole lot better), but it shows about the same level of judgement. No, everybody didn't become either a klansmen or communist.
|6.28.07 @ 1:58PM|#
Dude dropped 2 nukes on civilians, killing over 100,000, but the issue is whether or not his former Klan association makes him electable?
|6.28.07 @ 2:06PM|#
jf, if you had been on a transport in the Pacific at the time,
you would have stood up and cheered upon hearing the news, and
incinerating those hundred thousand probably save a couple million
or more civilians.
Pacifism is immoral, and if you weren't willing to fight WWII, you
are a pacifist. Once committed to fighting WWII leveling those two
cities was the least violent course of action.
|6.28.07 @ 2:07PM|#
Byrd is a contemptible POS for his actions in the Senate over many years and his claim to be "Mr. Constitution"--his copy must not include Article I, Section 8, evidently. It's bad that he was a Klan official (not merely 'in the Klan'), but his harm to the nation as a whole in the Senate is much greater.
|6.28.07 @ 2:10PM|#
Yes, Warren, I read what I posted.
You may now return to agonizing hairsplitting between the terms
"joined the Klan" and "was in the Klan."
|6.28.07 @ 2:17PM|#
J sub D,
Yes, he certainly did. Like Truman, he knew that it consisted of
most of the leading figures in his social and political circle, and
endorsed a racial ideology that was mainstream in the society he
grew up in. When we're talking about West Virginia around the
middle of the century, Byrd's (and Truman's, and Black's) actions
take on the cast of is to Soviet citizens who joined the Party, or
Iraqi citizens who joined the Ba'ath. I don't think this excuses
his actions, but it mitigates them enough that, combined with a
genuine conversion and a record that demonstrates repentance, I can
make judgements about Byrd beyond dismissing him as a "former
Klansman."
|6.28.07 @ 2:23PM|#
joe - Short and not so sweet. Senator Byrd is a bigoted asshole.
He's always been a bigoted asshole. Likely, he'll die a bigotted
asshole.
/rant
|6.28.07 @ 2:27PM|#
I don't know the man personally, J sub D. It is quite likely that a man from his time and place has some old-fashioned ideas - or maybe not "ideas" so much as "reflexes." Even those who reject the ideology of racism can't escape their upbringing.
|6.28.07 @ 3:26PM|#
Pacifism is immoral, and if you weren't willing to fight WWII, you are a pacifist.
I think you are profoundly incorrect.
Norm|6.28.07 @ 3:42PM|#
HnR 2007...
Joe: Harry Truman was once in the Klan
Warren: Bullshit
Repo Man 1984...
Miller: John Wayne was a fag.
All: The hell he was.
Miller: He was, too, you boys. I installed two-way mirrors in his
pad in Brentwood, and he come to the door in a dress.
|6.28.07 @ 4:53PM|#
I'm sure you do, Jake. When you stop being wrong, and change your mind, you'll no longer think that way.
|6.28.07 @ 5:02PM|#
When we're talking about West Virginia around the middle of
the century...
Wow, West Virginia in the middle of the century. 20th century,
right? Oh, he was just a redneck hillbilly, who joined an
organization that preached againsts, blacks, jews and catholics,
while routinely murdering the troublesome/uppity ones. No, he gets
no pass from me. Not now, not ever.
joe, sometimes I think you'd support Charles Manson if he joined
the democratic party.
|6.28.07 @ 5:22PM|#
Will,
I've never been called a pacifist before.
You do know that we know now, and in fact Truman knew then, that
Japan was already negotiating surrender due to the advance of the
Soviet army. I have a suspicion that Truman dropped the bomb to
show the Soviets who was boss, because that war was all but over.
Noted fellow pacifist Dwight D. Eisenhower agrees with me
In 1945 Secretary of War Stimson, visiting my headquarters in Germany, informed me that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act. During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives.
|6.28.07 @ 5:24PM|#
A bit more:
"The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan." Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet.[76]
"The use of [the atomic bombs] at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender." Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman.[76]
|6.28.07 @ 5:45PM|#
"I got it from the Klan page, which I found by typing "Harry
Truman Klan" into google and clicking on the first wikipedia
link."
What??? Wikipedia contradicts itself??? Say it isn't so!
|6.28.07 @ 5:52PM|#
"Pacifism is immoral, and if you weren't willing to fight WWII,
you are a pacifist. Once committed to fighting WWII leveling those
two cities was the least violent course of action."
So you're okay with nuking Iran and N. Korea?
|6.28.07 @ 6:11PM|#
So you're okay with nuking Iran and N. Korea?
Morally, no.
As a practical matter, yes We have to live with the rest of the
people on the planet after all.
|6.28.07 @ 6:37PM|#
Make that "Mmrally yes. As a practical matter, no." I plead artificially induced dyslexia.
|6.28.07 @ 9:01PM|#
Pacifism is immoral, and if you weren't willing to fight
WWII, you are a pacifist.
Hitler's goals were so unrealistic that there's no way Nazi Germany
would've lasted. But they may have been strong enough to destroy a
much more longer lasting, and I would argue worse, empire.
WWII was fought because FDR and the rest of his friends felt
solidarity with their socialist bretheren.
|6.28.07 @ 9:30PM|#
J sub D, I've read those quotes before, and they have always
struck me as simple unprovable second guessing. If the Japanese
were so damned ready to surrender, they would have done it, and
certainly so in the interim between Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They
didn't, and in the context of a war in which millions and millions
of civilians were butchered before the U.S. entered the conflict,
100,000 more were slaughtered.
Yeah, Chalupa, we should have sent emissaries demanding an
explanation on December 8, 1941, and really, with the Japanese
Empire busy slaughtering people by the millions throughout Asia,
how could we have been so belligerant as to embargo them?
Tippy, I have no idea of what you are talking about.
|6.28.07 @ 10:58PM|#
Y'know, just because me and J sub D share the same name (which I found out in an earlier thread) doesn't mean you can mistake one for the other.
highnumber|6.29.07 @ 12:07AM|#
WWII was fought because FDR and the rest of his friends felt
solidarity with their socialist bretheren[sic].
Do tell! Go on.
|6.29.07 @ 10:07AM|#
J sub D,
I'm not sure you realize this, but Byrd QUIT and DENOUNCED the
Klan.
Some of us would consider those to be relevant facts.
Grand Chalupa,
FDR began taking belligerent acts, such as embargoing the Japanese
and using the US Navy to hunt German subs, when the Soviet Union
was still a Nazi ally.
Read a book if you're going to mouth off on the subject.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245