Nick Gillespie | June 22, 2007
Here's some good news for modern man: According to
the Gallup Poll, which has been tracking this stuff since the
1970s, approval of Congress has never been lower. And the president
ain't doing so well, either, posting Nixonian percentages. The poll
was done via telephone with 1,007 adults in mid-June.
Some specifics:
In fact, it's pretty much a clean sweep across the board, says Gallup:
Americans are currently in a very sour mood; a state of affairs that is reflected in the relatively low confidence ratings given many Americans institutions [including business, religion, the police, banks, and more] in Gallup's latest survey....
We assume that the low confidence ratings measured this year are connected to Americans' broader malaise with the state of the country. It is not entirely clear what is behind the currently bad mood on the part of Americans, but Gallup analyses show that the Iraq war and the economy are certainly perceived as major problems at this point in time. The very low ratings for Congress suggest that Americans may be upset that their elected representatives have not been able to rectify these concerns as well.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
"It is not entirely clear what is behind the currently bad mood
on the part of a few tiny samples of the American public, but
Gallup analyses show that the Iraq war and the economy are
certainly perceived as major problems at this point in time."
There, fixed it.
If only this meant something. Of course, nothing will
change--politicians only fear low approvals if they think they
might lose their ability to feed at the trough. Since we've seen
that both parties will gorge themselves incessantly no matter what,
why should they give a shit what their ratings are?
Now, if there was a Gallup poll that showed 60% approval for "armed
insurrection", that might get some attention.
Odds are that approval of Congress would soar dramatically if they voted a huge new round of goodies for the American people. In fact, the rating of Congress, etc. is about where I'd expect it to be if Congress, etc. were controlled by Libertarians.(Assumes the voters were fooled into voting Libertarian.)
It is not entirely clear what is behind the currently bad
mood on the part of Americans[...]
Such a mystery! Why on Earth would the American public be unhappy
when we have all these awesome things:
1) Extraordinary rendition
2) The TSA
3) Wrong house no-knock raids
4) Two ongoing, disastrous wars
5) Profligate government spending
6) Kelo v. New London
7) The Imperial Presidency
8) Declining value of the US dollar
9) Imprisonment of doctors who treat pain
10) Widespread Congressional corruption
11) Well-publicized government incompetence
12) Paris Hilton
...
I could go on, but I'm tired... y'all can probably continue the
list. The point is, when the government gives us so much to hate,
even people who don't follow news of government outrages like us
are bound to run up against at least one of 'em.
(I'm sure the feds are behind Paris Hilton somehow... how else can
you explain the suspiciously complete lack of evidence that the
feds are behind Paris Hilton?)
The return of malaise. At least the cardigan sweater industry
should see an uptick.
Can stagflation be far behind?
But if we can just get a honest administration in the White House to clean all this up, everything will be fi... koff, koff... sorry, choked on my own sarcasm there. I've got to go lay down for awhile.
What happened to Americans confidence in Small
Business?!?!
They didn't report the new data! There must be hiding
something!
Jesus we're a bunch of whiny fucks.
Not saying everything is hunky dory, (When has it ever been?), but
if you listen to most people you'd think the landscape was dotted
with Hoovervilles and child prostitutes.
Surprise, the police and the military top the charts! There's no way the U.S. could ever devolve into authoritarianism/fascism, right Rudy?
In fact, the rating of Congress, etc. is about where I'd
expect it to be if Congress, etc. were controlled by
Libertarians.
Perhaps, but it wouldn't matter since whatever they did or didn't
do, it would have almost no impact on people's lives.
All the makings of a Ron Paul Revolution.
< Preacher-like voice >
Now is the time, brothers and sisters!
< /Preacher-like voice >
Sadly, the assholes in Congress will rally some support come Fall
'08. Get ready for the bi-annual Gay Marriage bashing, WOD pushing,
minimum-wage bullshit...
Nick, I don't know why this is good news; I agree with Creech and Chris S. People are upset with Congress because they aren't "doing enough." About the opposite of what most people here believe.
There's no way the U.S. could ever devolve into
authoritarianism/fascism, right Rudy?
What are you talking about? Some magazine and some think tank both
declared Rudy to be the most libertarian human being EVAH! All true
mainstream libertarians know this to be the gospel truth.
I could go on, but I'm tired... y'all can probably continue
the list.
13) American Idol
14) Baseball
15) Tight clothes on fat people
...
Some of the numbers seem counter-intuitive. The Police have more than 50% confidence, but the criminal justice system is in the 20's. Are prosecutors and judges really dragging down police work that much? Or did people just rate the reunion of Sting, Andy sumers and Stewart Copeland?
The rest of the world observes our alleged dicomfort and says,
in unison: "Waaaahhhhh!"
Yeah, they should have our "problems."
We're becoming a nation of whiners, yet we've never had it so
good.
Criminal Justice
the police didn't prosecute the Duke lacrosse players and let Paris
Hilton go after a day
police aren't not deporting illegal alien felons and trying to give
them permanent visas
...
16) Basketball
17) Hockey
18) 2012 Olympic logo
19) Monkeys in the Presidency
20) Rosie O'Donnell
21) Bill O'RLY
22) Dr. Phil, that mother****er
23) Oprah
24) Reality TV
25) Lame sitcoms
26) Itchy ass syndrome
27) Bologna
28) Lack of Monty Python
...
Brian24,
A lot of what people are upset about is caused or exacerbated by
Congress.
The comprehensive immigration bill has shown people all over the
political spectrum how responsive congress is to their wishes
SIV:
Actually it was the sheriff that let her go, and a judge and
prosecutor that got her put back so in a sense it was the police
that let her go.
"The very low ratings for Congress suggest that Americans may be
upset that their elected representatives have not been able to
rectify these concerns as well."
If only Congress would make a law, our problems would all
disappear.
I, for one, am awaiting (but not expecting) a day when Congress
"rectifies" a problem by declining to involve themselves in it.
Its simple... liberals and democrats are full of piss and
vinegar.
For at least 6 years they and their allies in the media have done
their best to convince people that everything sucks and we're all
gonna' die and we all deserve it too.
I'm sure the congress numbers are close (democrat angry we aren't
out of iraq, republican angry about illegals), but I bet you any
money the numbers on supporting the miltary was below 30% for
dems.
Seperate those numbers into (R)'s and (D)'s and I'm sure you could
do some constructive analysis.
What I find funniest about this thread is Jake Boone's idea that
the things that piss him off (and piss off most libertarians) are
in any way connected with the general public's perception of
things.
I think the one (very cynical) thing I've learned from holding the
views that I do, is that just about no one else (other than the
folks posting on this web-site) share those views...
Most folks roughly fall into the joe camp, and the rest fall
roughly into his opposite number's camp. That leaves the tiny
minority of those of us who have reached our point of view through
thoughtful consideration standing on the outside looking in - at
the UFC cage match that is the two-party system.
It is a weird thing with the police/military. Slap a government
uniform on someone and they have instant credibility. They same
government everyone says they hate. I'm not sure how that works in
peoples heads.
Both political parties do a whole lot of apolcalyptic ranting about
how Osama is going to personally come and kill you. Then the
republicans are going to take away your social security and you'll
have to eat cat food. Then global warming will cause us all to get
gay married. Doom sells I guess.
Anyone else notice how HMOs rank right there with Congress? THAT
is a sad state of affairs, my friends.
I agree with all those who say that people are upset that congress
isn't doing "enough."
I think the high approval rating for the police is a leftover from
9/11 when we were taught to worship the police as "heroes" as we do
our military, no matter what their conduct.
rob -
I was probably not as clear as I could have been. I'm not saying
that the public is up in arms over the same stuff I am; just that
with such a vast laundry list of abuses and incompetence, even the
joes and Johns of the world are going to find something in there to
hate right along with us.
It's sort of like the way that Phantom Menace was packed so chock
full of crap that even non-Star Wars fanboys could find something
to loathe in it.
As far as the police thing goes, most people go on with their
merry lives, rarely hearing about the abuses of power that happen
all too often.
When I tell my fiance about the some of the Balko posts on here,
she just shakes her head in utter disbelief. Then she tells me to
stop telling her these things because it frustrates her that
there's nothing she can do about it.
I think many people are just unable to accept that the men and
women who are supposed to "serve and protect" can just as easily
destroy our lives. When you do hear something on the MSM about
police brutality/corruption, it's usually only a 1 minute spot at
the most.
It is a sad state of affairs.
Can't be the economy. I'm doing great.
jimmydegeek
Your girlfriend just might be getting bored out of her skull with
your non-stop anti-cop tirade. Better watch it.
What I find funniest about this thread is seein the "the librul
media won't report the good news" line being applied to the entire
spectrum of American life, rather than just the Iraq War.
Although rob's ongoing mancrush on me is running a close
second.
I wonder if the 31/38 percent who are unhappy with "The medical system" aren't really just unhappy with the fact that they have to pay for it.
Your girlfriend just might be getting bored out of her skull with your non-stop anti-cop tirade. Better watch it.
Possibly...lol...
rob,
If I was actually the knee-jerk partisan you contend, and you were
such an above-the-fray objective observer, I wouldn't have such a
vastly surperior record of being right on issues of contention
compared to you.
Unless you want to contend that reflexive Democratic partisanship
is a reliable path to the truth, which I doubt.
As far as the police thing goes, most people go on with
their merry lives, rarely hearing about the abuses of power that
happen all too often.
Most people don't drive cars?
I had a mood ring when I was a kid. It stopped working after I wore it while swimming in the ocean. Damn shopkeeper wouldn't refund my quarter either.
#8: huh?
i take it you're referring to nativists there?
No, I'm referring to the dollar's slide against the Euro. Unless
you're talking to someone else and I'm misinterpreting the "#8"
reference.
but so what?
that's not a big deal. it's not a problem. indeed, it's a problem
for european exports.
But it's not a red herring.
Isaac
That's 31/38 percent who are HAPPY with The medical system. They're
the ones, like me, who can afford to pay for it.
Whenever you see these things, I just find myself hoping that
nobody takes them too seriously. They drift in the wind. Was there
an OJ type event? Boo Justice System! Who cares if it was an
anomaly? Left to their own, people have varying moods that smooth
out over time.
Unfortunately, the election cycle is ramping up so we will act like
this is the State of the National Mind.
I wonder if people would be happy with a medical system in which
half of all existing treatments were simply never thought of in the
first place, but everyone had equal access to the same crappy
medicine. I bet it would poll well.
And that is why we are screwed.
JasonL
Countriees with socialized medicine have a much bigger geriatric
problem than we do. All those old geezers! Fuck, we are
screwed.
but so what?
Unless I'm much mistaken, European goods becoming more expensive
relative to US buyers isn't just bad for European exporters - it's
also bad for US consumers.
As an example, I really like Ravensburger puzzles (manufactured in
Germany). In fact, their high quality has lead me to prefer them to
their American competitors. Now, however, it'll cost me that much
more to get 'em, since my American dollars have to pay for
production and labor that were bought with Euros. So Ravensburger
suffers on one end of the transaction, and I suffer on the other
end.
This also hurts any American company that uses some precursor part
from Belgium, for example. The US company pays in dollars for stuff
priced in Euros, and the exchange rate hurts the local buyer - a
pain which is passed on to the US consumer of whatever the finished
good might be.
"Countriees with socialized medicine have a much bigger
geriatric problem than we do. All those old geezers! Fuck, we are
screwed."
If we go socialized, there are two choices, other countries start
paying for development or no one does. Due to the aging demographic
primarily interested in access and not giving a crap about
development they may never get to see, I'm guessing we get the
latter. Development stalls to near nothing and everyone is happy.
After all, if nobody invents anything, you can't be mad that it
costs a lot.
I had read it as a generalization, not based on your specific
reason - those puzzles are AWESOME! I've heard that argument ("the
weak dollar") from nativists, and I had (knee jerked?) read it that
way.
Do you know the game "Scotland Yard" (hier). It's lots of
fun.
but yeah - I am kinda aware of the mechanisms you're describing
:)
(and my "Bulle von Tölz" series is costlier. /kicks pebble)
Here's some good news for modern man:
lol...
Wasn't that the one that showed that people in biblical times were
all faceless stick-people?
I for one am happier with my HMO than most of those topics
polled, largely because, like the other things, HMOs take my money
even though I don't use their services, but for the most part they
leave me the fuck alone.
A weak dollar also means more tourism in the US
Rein-
there are definitely different forces and reactions to the relative
position of the dollar. Some positive, some negative.
This is an absolute fantastic time (as was 1994/1995) for someone I
know who does lots of bidnez in good ol' Doitschland... but it
make's our wine guy's prices increase (hrumph)
:)
Do you know the game "Scotland Yard" (hier). It's lots of
fun.
Know it? I own it!
I sincerely thank you for the opportunity to geek out about board
games here at H&R in a totally unrelated thread. :)
My mostly (but not entirely) complete boardgamegeek game collection
is
hier.
My mostly (but not entirely) complete boardgamegeek game collection is hier.
URKOBOLD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND YOU GEEKS.
*Bows to the Board Game Meister*
At Water Tower Place in Chicago there's a shop called "Gamers
Paradise". It's awesome!
HMO's spend 20-30% of their budgets on admin and advertising,
JasonL. The comparable figure for Medicare is 2%.
That's an awful lot of money to reprogram for research, even if you
postulate a big reduction in overall spending.
I am far from Chicago, so no Gamers Paradise for me, I'm afraid. Still, Aloha, Oregon does have Rainy Day Games, which is the very best game store I've ever set foot in. It's near enough to Portland that I can swing by there whenever I'm up that way.
Same story every year. Everyone is pissed off and hates the
government, no one ever bothers to get off their butt and protest
or try to do something about it.
They just mindlessly go to the polls and select the next candidate
that's been pre-ordained by the same ninnies that gave us our
current Fearless Leader.
"The very low ratings for Congress suggest that Americans may be
upset that their elected representatives have not been able to
rectify these concerns as well."
GOP won't do it; Demos can't do it. Give the Libertarians a shot.
They couldn't do worse and they have the potential for doing a lot
better. We have nothing to lose but our chains.
Ask my opinion of approval ratings.
O.K.
M: How do you feel about approval ratings?
a) Strongly Approve
b) Somewhat Approve
c) Somewhat Disapprove
d) Strongly Disapprove
e) Don't give a goddam rat's ass.
Abdul said, "Or did people just rate the reunion of Sting, Andy
Summers and Stewart Copeland?"
The reunion concert in Oakland wasn't bad at all. I certainly would
rate it much higher than Congress or HMOs, though not near the top,
as the American Public seems to have done. ;-)
But if we're being honest: Cas Haley's version of "Walking on the
Moon" on "America's Got Talent" last week was a lot more
interesting -- for free, on the telly! -- than Sting's version of
the same song, which I paid good money to hear in person the week
before.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8eV3xhIw8A
but it make's our wine guy's prices increase
(hrumph)
Think Globally
Get shitfaced locally.
There is so much great wine produced in the
U.S.A.
I wonder what be the results if the survey was done on posters
at Hit & Run.
I am saddened that cops did as well as they did.
That's 31/38 percent who are HAPPY with The medical system.
They're the ones, like me, who can afford to pay for it.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Correction to 10:16am post:
I wonder if the 69/62 percent who are unhappy with "The medical
system" aren't really just unhappy with the fact that they have to
pay for it.
Edward, my saying I'm dissatisfied the fact that I don't get an
Audi R8 for free says
absolutely nothing about the quality or performance of said Audi
R8.
My being unable to afford something is irrelevant except that it
might lead to further dissatisfaction. Again this dissatisfaction
has nothing to do with the quality of the item at hand.
I might add that a great many of the people who complain about the
cost of medical care can quite handily afford it. It's just that
they might have to forego some spending on other items. This might
be a problem if those items were necessities but generally they are
not.
James Anderson Merritt
Remember libertarians are unhappy about the fact that Congress
won't leave them alone.
But, for the most part those in the general population who are
dissatisfied with Congress are that way because Congress won't vote
them boatloads of free stuff.
But, for the most part those in the general population who
are dissatisfied with Congress are that way because Congress won't
vote them boatloads of free stuff.
Point's been made quite a few times already, dude. Still valid
though.
Also, I would change "free" to "fucking expensive, but cheap
quality"
13) American Idol
14) Baseball
15) Tight clothes on fat people
Baseball? Man, baseball is so cool. I don't see hao anybady could
be dissatisfied with it.
"even the joes and Johns of the world are going to find
something in there to hate right along with us. It's sort of like
the way that Phantom Menace was packed so chock full of crap that
even non-Star Wars fanboys could find something to loathe in
it."
Jake - I'm totally with you, man... that part probably didn't come
through in my post.
"Although rob's ongoing mancrush on me is running a close second."
- joe
Of course, this delusion you have about other men having crushes on
you probably goes a long Freudian way toward explaining why you
think referring to other people by girls names (and other
homophobic/misogynistic-tinted references) are humorous insults...
Self-hatred is sad.
But it's actually OK with me if you're gay, joe, I just don't swing
that way. Sorry, bro.
(Please don't show up and shoot me in my kitchen for rejecting you,
like Kevin Spacey's crazed neighbor in "American Beauty!")
"If I was actually the knee-jerk partisan you contend, and you
were such an above-the-fray objective observer, I wouldn't have
such a vastly surperior record of being right on issues of
contention compared to you." - joe
What IS it like, living on DelusionWorld? You love to claim that
anyone who disagrees with you - like I often do - is a Republican,
even when that is blatantly untrue... Name a few positions the DNC
supports that you don't, or vice versa, and maybe people will
consider you as more of free-thinker than a blind partisan.
I've never claimed to be an "above-the-fray" observer, I definitely
have a point of view and an approach to the issues. (I've just
pointed out that I'm not a party partisan.) Unlike you, my POV
isn't based on one side's partisan talking points but on a general
philosophy that advocates for individual rights, respect for
democracy, the rule of law, limited gov't, free-market capitalism,
etc.
Which is why I can be supportive of the entire Bill of Rights
(instead of trying to pick and choose amongst them, like the two
parties do).
This philosophy leads me to rationally choose to be pro-choice,
anti-death penalty, pro-free market, anti-monopoly, anti-drug war,
etc.)
While we undoubtedly agree on a lot of issues, the ones we argue
about lead you to believe I'm your enemy. You're right - I'm
against your entire philosophical approach of
- selectively endorsing only the individual rights you like and
endorsing attempts to hinder those you don't
- negligible respect for the results of democracy when things don't
go your way in an election
- dismissing the equitable rule of law when it doesn't decide an
issue in favor of your position
- support for leviathan growth of authoritarian gov't
- hamstringing capitalism through gov't regulation
Funny you can't see that those are things both the Republicans and
Democrats have in common, and why both sides draw my ire.
"Unless you want to contend that reflexive Democratic partisanship
is a reliable path to the truth, which I doubt." - joe
Not anymore than I'd want to claim that about Republican
partisanship!
The 'problem' is easily explained: Telephones.
The only people who answer a telephone these days are miserable
deadbeats. (OK, I do sometimes.) Happy, successful people have
call-screeing, or can't be bothered with stupid phone-pollers, or
exclusively use cell phones, are at work when Gallup calls,
etc.
Think Globally
Get shitfaced locally.
There is so much great wine produced in the U.S.A.
That's like saying "why do you listen to all those British bands?
There's so many great American rock bands."
On the board game note, we had a couple over to play OakParkopoly a
few months ago. The guy had hand made a monopoly game themed to our
town and we had bought it at the annual church auction. It turned
out that he is a total geek for board games and he taught us a lot
about the history of Monopoly. He's written a book about it. I had
no idea that the game was created to promote Henry George's
ideas.
On another note, jimmy, "Itchy Ass Syndrome"?
HMO's spend 20-30% of their budgets on admin and
advertising, JasonL. The comparable figure for Medicare is
2%.
That's an awful lot of money to reprogram for research, even if you
postulate a big reduction in overall spending.
Sorry joe, but that's a misleading stat if it's accurate.
I work at a healthcare company that deals with Medicare/Medicaid
billing issues. The reason for such a low admin cost, if true, is
because all the admin is forced on the private companies. The state
just cuts a check. The rest of it is left up to private companies
to navigate the tangle of beauracracy that is medicare/medicaid.
That alone costs thousands and thousands of manhours. This doesn't
even touch on the waste when medicaid applicants are put on hold
for MONTHS to have their elgibilty checked. In the meantime the
company has to continue to provide service. If approved the company
gets their money, minus the interest and manhours used during the
wait of course. If the applicant is denied the company is probably
going to get stuck with a write off.
Yeah no waste their.
rob,
"What IS it like, living on DelusionWorld?"
It's sort of like Iraq, except the schools don't get painted as
often, and success isn't just around the corner quite so often.
Mote, beam, loonie-toons.
"You love to claim that anyone who disagrees with you - like I
often do - is a Republican"
No, there are a lot of people I disagree with who aren't
Republicans. You just don't happen to be among them. It's not too
hard to figure out the difference - actual non-partisans actually
write posts criticizing Republicans, unlike yourself.
"Name a few positions the DNC supports that you don't, or vice
versa," I don't know what positions "the DNC" supports. I argue
against positions individual Democrats take on a regular
basis.
"I've never claimed to be an "above-the-fray" observer, I
definitely have a point of view and an approach to the issues."
Yes, a Republican one, which you deny, and prefer to pose as a
"non-partisan," independent thinker, while you launch all of your
fire at Democrats, and only at Democrats.
"(I've just pointed out that I'm not a party partisan.) Unlike you,
my POV isn't based on one side's partisan talking points..."
As you keep reminding us. In little parenthetical asides. That you
put in your posts while criticizing Democrats, and only Democrats,
while making arguments that come directly from Republican talking
points.
"Funny you can't see that those are things both the Republicans and
Democrats have in common, and why both sides draw my ire."
Actually, the Republicans don't seem to draw your ire. Ever. At
least, not in any way that ever leads you to write comments
criticizing them.
Pain,
You assume that all of that effort would be duplicated in a
single-payer system, when in fact, a great deal of it would be
outright eliminated.
"HMO's spend 20-30% of their budgets on admin and advertising,
JasonL. The comparable figure for Medicare is 2%.
That's an awful lot of money to reprogram for research, even if you
postulate a big reduction in overall spending."
If I remotely believed either that those numbers would hold or that
'reprogramming' money to research would have the desired effect, I
wouldn't be so terrified. Don't worry. I have no doubt your side
will win. I also have no doubt that people will be happy with the
results and never once dwell on what could have been. It is like
watching a train wreck 25 years in the making for me.
J Sub D:
agreed! but Grüner Vetliner is Austrian.
We just had a Syrah from Peay Brothers, Sonoma Coast, CA.
AMAZING!!!!
Russian River (Dutton); Iron Horse.
yeaaaaa!
A big thanks to VM and Jake Boone for the link to that board game site. Not only did I just waste an hour of company time, but now I'm planning on stopping by the hobby shop on my way home...
"I could go on, but I'm tired... y'all can probably continue the
list.
13) American Idol
14) Baseball
15) Tight clothes on fat people
..."
16) Phat clothes on tight people.
Chuckle
please all credit to Jake (although I do accept any blame for being
a part of things) - he is DA MAN when it comes to games.
Awesome.
Health care is for whimps. It's better to live free and die from some preventable illness than submit to the slavery of socialized medicine. It's bad enough that we're forced to drink tap water that has been purified by government bureaucrats. Bring on the e-coli! The intestines of the truly free and the resolutely brave can take it.
Edward,
Are you the less kind and less gentle version of Dan T.?
Is gamma radiation somehow involved?
highnumber,
I'm a card fucking carrying Hayek-reading right-wing anti-state
pro-freedom ass-kicking
get-your-nanny-state-nose-outa-my-healthcare-you-mother-fucking-socialist-LIBERTARIAN.
What are you?
"Actually, the Republicans don't seem to draw your ire. Ever. At
least, not in any way that ever leads you to write comments
criticizing them." - joe
Like I've said before, I would, but you refuse to argue the
Republican's points. In other words, it's not that I don't gladly
hammer Republicans, it's that most of my posts here are in direct
opposition to the nonsense you spout - which I find to be
particularly odious and statist/authoritarian.
If you'd argue a few more points that were statist/authoritarian
from the Republican viewpoint, I'd gladly hammer you on those
points as well. But you're such a partisan you actually beleive
that the only people who would disagree with you are
Republicans.
It's an interesting paradigm for a left-leaning guy who mostly
posts on a libertarian blog...
And no, I'm still not going to the prom with you. Salma Hayek asked
me first, and I really dig her last name.
'm a card fucking carrying Hayek-reading right-wing
anti-state pro-freedom ass-kicking
get-your-nanny-state-nose-outa-my-healthcare-you-mother-fucking-socialist-LIBERTARIAN.
What are you?
I'm Batman.
That's like saying "why do you listen to all those British
bands? There's so many great American rock bands."
I graciously concede the point to a valid, succinct argument.
"I'm not right-wing."
Clearly identies one as not libertarian.
Single Issue Voter
You have rocks in your head. There are certainly left-wing
libertarians. Name one? Chomsky.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245