Radley Balko | June 20, 2007
In a fun reversal of roles, the Texas Lottery may have to dip into public school funds to cover payouts on one of its guaranteed-jackpot games.
But at least the state's SWAT teams still have money to raid private poker games!
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Why not have a privatized lottery company (or companies) and pay a licensing fee to the state as its cut?
Selling off the lottery was considered this year in the legislature. It didn't go far.
Why not have a privatized lottery company (or companies) and
pay a licensing fee to the state as its cut?
Why not have a privatized lottery company (or companies) and pay
the same fees and taxes that any other businesses pay. You know,
like the 1 hour Martinizing place down the street.
On the raiding of private poker parties... like anything else of this type, someone-- someone is turning these people in. I mean, think about it, no one's kicking in my door. A wrong-door drug raid you can at least point to the fact that they meant to hit the place next door. But someone is turning in their neighbor. A pissed off neighbor, an annoyed family member-- who's doing it?
shame on you radley for stealing fark stories without citing your sources
But someone is turning in their neighbor. A pissed off
neighbor, an annoyed family member-- who's doing it?
One would presume if Pokerati.com is really "The news source
for Dallas poker ... As always, Pokerati has all the insider scoop
and firsthand accounts" that someone in blue might be listening
in.
Does this mean that price controls don't work any better in the
lottery?
Oh, the neighbor doing the turning in is the one with tire tracks
on the lawn the next morning.
In a fun reversal of roles, the Texas Lottery may have to
dip into public school funds to cover payouts on one of its
guaranteed-jackpot games.
Which may actually be a better use for the cash than what the
public schools would have spent it for.
Of course, having a state-monopolized lottery makes it even more important to raid private gambling. Otherwise people will get to thinking they can gamble without giving the state its 50% cut. (I wonder how much money evaporates after the cops seize it and before the logs are filled out.)
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245