Jesse Walker | May 30, 2007
Jay
Hancock
understands why Alan Greenspan wouldn't speak forthrightly
about the economy while he chaired the Fed: "He didn't want to go
down in history as the Federal Reserve boss whose mouth caused a
market crash." He also understands why Greenspan is more willing to
pipe up now: The old man "wants to make some money after working
for the government for nearly two decades. Giving speeches via
satellite is an easy way to do so."
What Hancock doesn't get is why so many people are listening:
For many investors, old habits die hard, and the alleged maestro still moves markets whether or not he actually says anything.
On two occasions this year, Greenspan has caused turbulence for stocks....But why is everybody paying attention?
Without the power to create money and steer the world economy, Greenspan is just another forecaster. And not a very good one. His firm, Townsend Greenspan, was famous for making bad forecasts -- particularly on inflation -- before he joined the Fed.
"Inside that opaque, mush-mouthed gnome lurked an eloquent commentator waiting to get out, and now he's indulging all the urges that he stifled in the 1990s," Hancock concludes. "But it's too late. They don't allow do-overs on Wall Street."
Elsewhere in Reason: Brian Doherty reviews Greenspan's term as wizard-in-chief.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
This of course is another excellent Reason link to Ron Paul. The
congressman is insightful as ever.
http://www.reason.com/news/show/38384.html
Reason: Congressman Paul, you've tweaked Greenspan
about his radical Randian past…
Paul: Shortly after I got back into Congress,
about 1999 or so, they had invited us on the House Financial
Services Committee to get our pictures taken with Greenspan and say
hello. I dug out my copy of The Objectivist Newsletter [edited by
Ayn Rand] where he wrote his gold article [in which Greenspan
praised the gold standard as a source of economic stability,
guarantor of economic liberty, protector of savings, and check on
government's power to inflate and spend]. When we started talking I
flashed it out and said, "Remember this?" He said, "Yes, I
certainly do."
I opened it up to his article and said, "Remember writing this
article? Would you autograph it for me?" And while he was
autographing it I said, "You want to write a disclaimer on it?"
"No, I read it recently," he said, "and I wouldn't change a
word."
Toward the end of his reign I brought that up again in a
congressional hearing. I was a little more confrontational with him
about what he used to think and why it's different now, and he
said, "That's a long time ago, and I no longer subscribe to those
views." He did put a disclaimer on it. The first encounter was
private, and the second was a public statement.
That fucker is a plague that should be wiped from the earth.
That asshole was an awful fed boss and now he's fucking with the
markets every time he opens his mouth.
DIAGF.
Wow, TPG. Have you been feeling irritable lately? I mean, that's
a pretty big step up from kicking him in the balls.
What do you think of George Soros, btw?
Check out Greenspan's brilliant essay "Antitrust" (published in Ayn Rand's Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal). I've never encountered a better analysis of the subject.
Wow, TPG. Have you been feeling irritable lately? I mean,
that's a pretty big step up from kicking him in the
balls.
Greenspan is the windmill to my Don Quixote. No one did more to
fuck up the economy in the last 25 years than he, and he is somehow
revered by the goddamned morons in the media.
What do you think of George Soros, btw?
Fine by me. He never used his governmental authority to speak on
things that he had no business speaking about in his duties.
Goodness, Goiter, you should cut back on your caffeine.
Well, no, I take it back. You're merely expressing your anger and
opinion; no reason to mock that. (i.e., I hate it when I'm angry
and a coworker or someone laughs off my concerns.) So, vent on. You
can go back to being (somewhat) more even-handed tomorrow.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245