David Weigel | May 21, 2007
The "bleeding heart conservative" and RFK 2.0 are teaming up to... threaten Iran.
Sens. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, and Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kansas, are teaming up to sponsor legislation that seeks to encourage divestment from companies that support Iran.
"The time has come for the federal government to assist citizens, institutional investors, and state and local governments in divesting from companies that support the Iranian regime," Brownback said in a statement. "The Iranian regime is the world's biggest state sponsor of terror, proudly flaunts an illegal nuclear program, and continues to violate the basic human rights of the Iranian people."
Actually, that doesn't sound like an awful bill, given the tone of the Iran debate. I piled on Obama for saying "all options are on the table" with Iran in my "20 questions" article and then, of course, Mike Gravel did the same thing. But there's an obvious difference between a senator saying that and an acting president* saying it. Obama probably isn't a hawk; he just wants to make sure no one mistakes him for a dove.
*Is this confusing? The difference is that a senator isn't a head of state and lacks the power to actually nuke Iran, and nukes are what are implied when people discuss - but don't name - the stuff "on the table."
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
"But there's an obvious difference between a senator saying that
and an acting president saying it."
I don't get the difference.
And what's an acting president?
Dave was my favorite out of all of the Clinton-esque president movies of the 90's.
(The West Wing)>Dave>First Kid>Primary Colors>The American President>Wag the Dog
Was Chris Rock elected Pres in Head of State? I
forget.
Yes, and Bernie Mac was elected vice president.
Luke Wilson wasn't president, former porn star and champion wrestler Camacho was.
"The Iranian regime is the world's biggest state sponsor of
terror"
Just curious, but how do you quantify that statement? Are there
benchmarks? If so, I'd like to know why the country that reduced
Iraq to rubble isn't competing for the Biggest State Terrorist
trophy.
"The Iranian regime is the world's biggest state sponsor of
terror"
Just curious, but how do you quantify that statement
You can't. The fact that even Reason Magazine let's Obama slide on
all kinds of bullshit that the magazine would call Clinton,
Edwards, McCain or Giuiliani on, just shows that the guilty white
liberal strain in America runs deep ...
To wit, "Obama probably isn't a hawk; he just wants to make sure no
one mistakes him for a dove."
Incinerated Iranian women and children will be able to die happily,
knowing that they were nuked by a biracial dove, not a white male
hawk. How wonderful!
So what Obama is saying is that Bush's war in Iraq is evil, but a
war agasinst Iran started by The Magic Christian Negro (apologies
to Starr and Sellers) is ideologically pure?
Your assumption (that nuking Iran is what's implied in the "table" argument) is wrong, and your conclusion (that it's a good strategy to say things are off the table) is wrong. Aside from that, good argument.
The State Department has listed Iran as the largest state
sponsor of terror for decades, stemming mostly from their support
for Hezbollah.
Easily looked up, Bobdobalina. As are quotes from white people -
actual white people! - using the same language.
Take your whitebread persecution fantasies elsewhere.
From the race hustlers at Forbes magazine:
"As in previous years, the 2006 report identifies Iran as the "most
active state sponsor" of terror, accusing the Islamic Republic of
helping plan and foment attacks to destabilize Iraq and derail
Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts."
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245