Reason Magazine
- reason.com
- reason.tv
- reason.org
- Donate
- Site Search:
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsadvertisements
A Danceable (Final) Solution/To Teenage Revolution
What is it abut Brit rockers of the 70s and a yen for the Nazi look? And, following on that, a yen for getting attacked by bored activists?
[Bryan Ferry], the 61-year-old lead singer of Roxy Music, told Germany's Welt Am Sonntag newspaper last month: "The way that the Nazis staged themselves and presented themselves, my Lord!
"I'm talking about the films of Leni Riefenstahl and the buildings of Albert Speer and the mass marches and the flags -- just fantastic. Really beautiful."
In a statement, Ferry said he was "deeply upset" about the negative publicity the interview triggered... Jewish leaders in Britain, some of whom had condemned Ferry's comments and questioned whether he should be dropped by the Marks & Spencer retail chain that employs him as a model, welcomed Ferry's clarification.
Ridiculous. This isn't even the Nazi metaphor-mixing I defended back in 2005. This is a totally true statement about how Nazis had excellent design sense. C'mon, does someone want to argue that Leni Riefenstahl didn't have a great sense of aesthetics?
One wrinkle in the "does praising Nazi design mean praising Nazis?" debate is the fact that today's anti-Semites and genocidalists generally have awful design sensabilities. The fearsome brownshirt of the 1930s has given way to the beer-gutted skinhead, the Hamas quasi-ninja, and the sad-sack Iranian soldier. The only people who want to learn from/rip off Nazi iconography are savvy, politically-disinterested artists and rock stars.
|4.16.07 @ 3:07PM|#
The SS looked like they were comic book heros.
Our troops looked like they were there to fix the air
conditioner.
But hey, we won! Yaaaaayyyyyyyy frumpy!
|4.16.07 @ 3:10PM|#
It's true - Nazi "fine art" was atrocious, but their graphic
design, architecture fashion sense and sense of spectacle was
fantastic. Cold and inhuman, but fantastic.
No wonder Reifenstahl has been ripped off by film-makers from
Welles to Lucas, and David Bowie stalked the stage in a black SS
coat. Hitler would have despised this adulteration of his precious
symbols for decadent, sybaritic ends, so it's fine by me.
|4.16.07 @ 3:11PM|#
Had the Italians fascists had the military ability and fashion sense of the Nazis, they would now be today's "stock villain" in most movies. Fortunately for them, they were busy getting kicked out of Ethiopia and looking rather plain in the process.
ed|4.16.07 @ 3:13PM|#
Our troops looked like they were there to fix the air
conditioner.
In Auschwitz, air conditioner fix you.
|4.16.07 @ 3:14PM|#
Yeah, they did try to murder entire sections of humanity and
were pretty much the evilest people alive, but damn they did look
good doing it.
In all fairness Joe, the Ike Jacket and the brown kaki looked damn
good. Yeah maybe not as swank as a black trench coat with a death
head on it, but pretty damn good nonetheless.
|4.16.07 @ 3:24PM|#
C'mon, does someone want to argue that Leni Riefenstahl
didn't have a great sense of aesthetics?
I had to watch Triumph of the Will for a history class once. I
thought it was to films what Mein Kampf was to literature. . .
boring, over the top propaganda that went on too long. Really, did
the Nazis shoot all the editors first?
I never figured out that while Nazi is little short of a euphemism
for evil nowadays, even the cultural elite have some affection for
Riefenstahl's "art." I'd rather watch paint dry.
|4.16.07 @ 3:26PM|#
The SS looked like they were comic book heros.
Our troops looked like they were there to fix the air
conditioner.
I presume you're talking about their combat fatigues. Their service
uniforms actually looked pretty spiffy. Just look at any photo of
General Marshall wearing his green jacket and khaki trousers. But
even the combat fatigues of the WW2 GI look like high fashion
compared to the desert camouflage fatigues that I see all the time
on the Metro, and which appear to become standard office wear for
soldiers assigned to the Pentagon. Those things look like pajamas,
though not nearly as neat as the black pajamas that Charlie used to
wear in Vietnam.
|4.16.07 @ 3:28PM|#
The SS looked like they were comic book heros.
Our troops looked like they were there to fix the air conditioner.
I presume you're talking about their combat fatigues. Their service uniforms actually looked pretty spiffy.
Comic book heroes? Maybe early-90s vintage:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oU_Cz8b2sM (hilarious bit)
|4.16.07 @ 3:34PM|#
Sadism and black leather just go together. Ironically, it also
seems to be a gay thing.
Ohhh Whip me, hurt me, Make me sing Wagner!
Timothy|4.16.07 @ 3:35PM|#
This is the rough equivalent of saying that Hitler was a brilliant public speaker, which is also largely true.
|4.16.07 @ 3:36PM|#
I have to concur that no other political power since the Romans
have plied the symbolism = might design influence as well.
Think of it, the marches, the banners, the flag/pole bearers, the
bonfires, the rallies... even the Soviets could never master the
art of powerful symbolism quite the same way. Mass murdering
fuckheads maybe, but damn they looked the part!
|4.16.07 @ 3:41PM|#
Dave Weigel:
What if you were to rock a Hitler-style mustache?
There's nothing wrong with that 'stache, per se, it's just
that human minds make weird associations.
I love classical architecture. And a good parade.
But the sheer terribleness of fascism was such that it toxified
everything it touched.
|4.16.07 @ 3:45PM|#
What if you were to rock a Hitler-style mustache?
I prefer that you call it "Charlie Chaplin style."
Thank you.
VM|4.16.07 @ 3:47PM|#
"What if you were to rock a Hitler-style mustache?"
you'd be that dood opposite Holly Johnson in "Frankie"
D.A. Ridgely|4.16.07 @ 3:49PM|#
Ah, the fortunes of war. Today, the police in Germany wear
uniforms intentionally designed to signify an authority level
somewhere between bus driver and Maytag repairman and the military
uniforms aren't much better.
I agree with Seamus that the U.S. Army dress uniforms and fatigues
during WWII were "pretty spiffy" and a damned sight better than the
polyester puke greens and BDUs they wear today, especially
including the earlier garrison caps by contrast to those idiotic
"morale boosting" black felt berets they are now forced to
wear.
|4.16.07 @ 3:50PM|#
I seem to remember Mel Brooks praising the Nazis' outfits. Mel certianly loves the nazis' pagentry.
|4.16.07 @ 3:51PM|#
How about those "Death Star officer" hats worn by the Japanese officers - natty or dorky?
|4.16.07 @ 4:00PM|#
The United States takes seriously the cliche "The side with the
simplest uniform wins". Since we are not fighting anyone with a
real uniform. So we had to make an outfit that is simpler then Arab
street clothes. It is a race to the bottom.
I think it is cool that the rank tab is now center of mass above
the body armor batman style.
|4.16.07 @ 4:02PM|#
Those weird half-teardrop-shaped helmets worn by the grunts who actually "fire" the Death Star: pro or con?
|4.16.07 @ 4:04PM|#
I was one of the first people to be dumb enough to buy the new ACUs. I went to JRTC with it and was the only guy in them. One of the AARs for the exercise was "you could see that guy in the ACU's from everywhere". This is our new hi tech uniform. The damn thing also rips at the slightest touch and is hotter than hell. Hotter than the tree suit and I didn't think that was possible. I can't imagine the poor bastards in Iraq in them. The DCU was a very comfortable nice looking uniform. But of course we had to get rid of it.
|4.16.07 @ 4:13PM|#
Meanwhile, not a word said about the millions of Che
T-shirts and posters.
Make one with your own face:
www.letsgetshirtfaced.com
|4.16.07 @ 4:14PM|#
This is the rough equivalent of saying that Hitler was a brilliant public speaker, which is also largely true.
I never got that. He always looked like a lunatic to me.
|4.16.07 @ 4:16PM|#
I was pretty sure I heard, when the movie version of Starship Troopers came out, that the art director or costume designer or somebody involved with the movie said that if you want military uniforms that are really cool and stylish, "you really have to look to the Third Reich." But Google turns up nothing.
|4.16.07 @ 4:31PM|#
"I never got that. He always looked like a lunatic to me."
I had a german professor in college who was also a communications
PHD. Acutally Hitler's speeches didn't make a hell of a lot of
sense even in German. But they had an almost hypnotic quality about
them to the listeners. The listeners never really understood what
he was saying either to a large degree. But the quality of the
voice and the way it was delivered really affected people. It was
just down right creepy how is speeches worked.
|4.16.07 @ 4:41PM|#
Stevo,
Found quite a bit on Google regarding the uniform styling, etc. but
not that quote. It may have been from the Jan. 1998 Sight
and Sound referenced here but I
have not been able to find the text of the review online.
|4.16.07 @ 4:50PM|#
Today, the police in Germany wear uniforms intentionally
designed to signify an authority level somewhere between bus driver
and Maytag repairman
Yeah, but the MP5s I saw them carrying at the Munich El-Al terminal
in 2000 tended to make up for that deficiency somewhat.
|4.16.07 @ 4:52PM|#
Sadism and black leather just go together. Ironically, it
also seems to be a gay thing.
...or not so ironic - the SA (Brownshirts) were led by Ernst Roehm,
who was gay. Most of the other SA leadership was also gay. Roehm
thought that the SA would replace the Army, which horrified the
Prussian officer corps. Hitler needed their support, so Himmler
(Roehm's rival) had the SA leaders killed.
Other than Riefenstahl, there weren't too many other Nazi artists
(or German artists willing to stay in Nazi Germany) who made much
of an impact. Douglas Sirk / Detlef Sierck, maybe, but I believe he
left before the war started. Veit Harlan was the next best director
they had, and 'competent' is about all you could say for him.
(Regarding the construction of his films - not their
content.
|4.16.07 @ 4:54PM|#
It's okay, so long as you dress like the good
Nazis.
Pro Lib,
You mean like Ilsa,
She-Wolf of the SS?
|4.16.07 @ 4:54PM|#
What's up with that, anyway?
When is it a good idea to fire an automatic weapon in an airport
terminal?
What is the situation that ends with everyone in the terminal
saying, "Thank God that cop didn't have to aim and fire each shot?"
Wouldn't the type of emergency they're likely to face make it
better to have one hand free?
I remember thinking the same thing about the National Guardsmen in
the airports after 9/11. Thanks for your service, glad you're here,
but what's up with the M-16?
|4.16.07 @ 5:00PM|#
But the quality of the voice and the way it was delivered
really affected people. It was just down right creepy how is
speeches worked.
I've watched some footage of his speeches. I think John is onto
something. There's a certain rhythm that he had to his voice where
he build momentum with for few beat then explode and there crowd
would go nuts. I've never seen anything else quite like it.
|4.16.07 @ 5:03PM|#
Yeah, but the MP5s I saw them carrying at the Munich El-Al
terminal in 2000 tended to make up for that deficiency
somewhat.
I first saw that on a layover in Frankfurt in 92.
My reaction was the same as joe's.
LarryA|4.16.07 @ 5:07PM|#
I remember thinking the same thing about the National
Guardsmen in the airports after 9/11. Thanks for your service, glad
you're here, but what's up with the M-16?
1. At the time it was the only firearm they were issued or trained
to use.
2. My problem was that most of the rifles were not loaded.
|4.16.07 @ 5:11PM|#
I think you have to be very careful about knocking Riefenstahl
for Triumph of the Will. She was tasked with making a documentary
of a political convention. Not the sort of topic you usually think
would result in great cinema. What she produced was a work of art,
and perhaps more importantly, an invaluable historical record. Some
peope forget the context of Triumph. This was the first Nazi Party
Congress following the Night of the Long Knives. The men Hitler
murdered were extremely popular among the rank and file. So this
was a pivitol moment in Nazi history. Hitler was by no means
assured a pleasant reception. He had to smooth over the resentment.
And he did so through sheer audacity and spectacle. The title of
the film was apt. Some people refer to Triumph as a propaganda
film, but I think that is wrong. It was a progaganda event.
Riefenstahl didn't create that, she just filmed what Speer created.
A critic could argue the that the manner in which she filmed the
event played in to what Speer's creation, but one could just as
easily say she beautifully, and accurately captured the tone and
mood of the event.
Another point I'd like to add. You frequently see it cited that
Riefenstahl's work for Hitler in the 1930's led to her being
"blacklisted" from filmwork after the war. I could see this as
being plausible today, but studio would have allowed a female
director durring he 1950's? Riefenstahl's sex, before we even got
in to her political affiliations, would have put the kibosh on her
career. Women simply didn't direct films back then, unless they
happened to have won the favor of a progressive, genocidal
dictator. Nazism didn't ruin Riefenstahl's carrer. It made it
possible.
Rhywun|4.16.07 @ 5:11PM|#
I remember thinking the same thing about the National
Guardsmen in the airports after 9/11.
They're still milling about in various NYC hotspots. The
tourists don't pose for photographs with them so much now. Maybe
they woke up and realized that a Manhattan crawling with
machine-gun toting soldiers isn't so "cool" any more.
I've never seen anything else quite like it.
I agree. I speak German and I can't make out anything he says
either*, but it sure is riveting.
*I think part of it is the heavy southern accent. But the rhythm is
a big part too.
|4.16.07 @ 5:11PM|#
"One wrinkle in the "does praising Nazi design mean praising
Nazis?" debate is the fact that today's anti-Semites and
genocidalists generally have awful design sensabilities."
Okay, but Ahmadinejad looks amazing in his tailored suits with the
open-neck dress shirts. His neatly trimmed beard contrasted against
his olive skin...
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/images/photos2006/Ahmadinejad0.jpg
The man knows how to dress. It may or may not trickle down to the
troops, but he is the biggest fashion star on the world-leaders
stage since Kennedy IMHO.
stephen the goldberger|4.16.07 @ 5:13PM|#
Although this news item is essentially trivial it does signify an important issue involved in WWII History. We should try to understand the root cause of nazism's appeal instead of just coding it as institutionalized anti-semitism. There was a lot more going on there than just hatred of Jews.
|4.16.07 @ 5:25PM|#
highnumber,
Hmmm. I think this answers stephen the goldberger's query about
whether Nazism rose from something more than mere antisemitism.
|4.16.07 @ 5:43PM|#
lunchstealer,
Could be. They're certainly less tainted than, say, Rommel or von
Braun. Or von Stauffenberg, though I'm not sure what negatives
could be associated with him. . .other than playing ball at all,
anyway.
|4.16.07 @ 6:43PM|#
LarryA,
"1. At the time it was the only firearm they were issued or trained
to use."
What about their sidearms? Why wouldn't a large-caliber pistol be
better in a crowded terminal? They're probably be better off with
that and a truncheon.
Greg Kucharo|4.16.07 @ 7:02PM|#
Not one of you chumps commented on the deft headline that went with this entry.
|4.16.07 @ 7:44PM|#
...the SA (Brownshirts) were led by Ernst Roehm, who was
gay.
Who remembers Underzog?
I miss that lovable scamp.
Franklin Harris|4.16.07 @ 8:12PM|#
OK, so I'm not the first to make a reference to Ilsa, She-Wolf of the SS. Just remember, the "good" Nazis only want to torture you for sexual gratification.
|4.16.07 @ 8:58PM|#
For an underrated Naziplotation classic, check out "Last Orgy of the Third Reich". It distingushes itself in the genre by not being afraid to directly confront the racial ideology of the Third Reich. The actresses themselves may not be Jewish (though they are the next closest thing- Italians), but the characters they play most certainly are. It also contains one of the greatest lines in cinema history, when a bunch of Nazi officers gather round a dinner table and as the food is being served one cackles, "ahh, nothing better than a pot roast of unborn Jew!". Yes, this film is not afraid to pull any punches. The nudity is frequent, the acting solid, and the plotline suprisingly nuanced. Shades of The Night Porter.
|4.16.07 @ 10:23PM|#
Today, the police in Germany wear uniforms intentionally
designed to signify an authority level somewhere between bus driver
and Maytag repairman and the military uniforms aren't much
better.
Interestingly, those revolutionaries in East Germany did a pretty
good job of carrying on the German uniform tradition.
|4.16.07 @ 11:17PM|#
It isn't quite right that the Nazis looked like comic book
heroes, at least not superheroes. Superman, et al owed
their flashy duds primarily to circus performers, and to the kind
of comic opera costumery found in the illustrations in science
fiction magazines, to the newspaper adventure strips such as
Flash Gordon and The Phantom, and to a strong
dose of Hollywood costume drama. Sometimes they cribbed from common
sources. C.C. Beck used a costume design he had previously drawn up
to illustrate The Student Prince when clothing Captain
Marvel.
Will Eisner played a good trick when he invented Blackhawk
and his multinational squadron of flyers. He dressed them up in
knockoffs of Third Reich wear, fighting fire with fire, so to
speak.
When Mel Brooks filmed The Producers, he included homages
to the Busby Berkely movies of the 1930s. How much do you think
Speer stole from those?
Kevin
|4.16.07 @ 11:31PM|#
I think that this vid sums up the Nazis' bent for both sartorial
sharpness and ambiguous sexuality nicely:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZHzS1u1TCc
|4.17.07 @ 2:17AM|#
The MP-5 and M-16 are both capable of fully automatic fire, but
do not have to be used as such. You can switch them to semi-auto
(one shot per trigger pull) or 3-round burst.
I'd say they're both a better option in an airport terminal than a
large-caliber pistol. First of all, they're both going to be easier
to shoot acurrately at longer ranges, especially the M-16.
Secondly, the MP5 shoots 9mm Luger and the M-16 shoots .223/5.56mm.
Both of these are relatively small caliber that shouldn't give you
overpenetration problems; important around crowds. Using a
large-caliber pistol instead would give you the double whammy of
reduced accuracy plus greater consequences for being
innaccurate.
This often comes as a shock to people who don't shoot, but that
deer rifle your grandpa kept in his closet (let's assume 30-06)
packs a hell of a lot more punch than the ammo an M-16 uses. The
fact that it has a pretty wooden stock and the M-16 is evil-looking
black metal and plastic shouldn't fool you.
|4.17.07 @ 3:34AM|#
In the eternal argument "why do people remember the Nazis, but
forget the crimes of the Communists" style certainly plays a big
role, and is not mentioned enough. The early Bolsheviks looked kind
of cool with their leather coats and sidearms, but by Stalin's time
the Soviet Union had already achieved the frumpy shapeless look it
would carry to the end of its existence. The Communists never
looked like evil master minds, more like annoying bureaucrats,
which is one reason most of us in the West never took them
seriously. And that's also the reason Hollywood never made great
films with evil Russians, it's not just because Hollywood is full
of leftists. The one big failure of Nazi aesthetics were the steel
helmets - they look goofy on most people, the British or the
American helmet is a much better choice.
On the other hand, the Nazis were not terribly original - most of
the pageantry was stolen lock, stock & barrel from the Romans.
It's ironic that the Germans did a much better job of resurrecting
pagan Roman symbolism than the Italians did.
Andrew Ian Dodge|4.17.07 @ 6:31AM|#
On the other hand, the Nazis were not terribly original -
most of the pageantry was stolen lock, stock & barrel from the
Romans. It's ironic that the Germans did a much better job of
resurrecting pagan Roman symbolism than the Italians
did.
Yes, trouble is most people don't their history well enough to
understand that irony.
|4.17.07 @ 9:40AM|#
I thought it was to films what Mein Kampf was to literature.
. . boring, over the top propaganda that went on too long. Really,
did the Nazis shoot all the editors first?
That tends to be true of old movies though; at least, old movies
that are supposed to be On a Large Scale. Those don't age well, at
all, because you have to realize that movies were still novel and
amazing at the time.
|4.17.07 @ 11:56AM|#
I'm not gay*, but, Mother of Pearl, Bryan Ferry is a sexy, sexy
man.
* Not that there's anything wrong with that.
|4.17.07 @ 9:25PM|#
The Nazis would've won and would've avoided their criminal excesses if they'd continued their Romanization and adopted the toga. Yep, it's that simple, folks.
|4.18.07 @ 3:59AM|#
Actually the Romans were quite adept at criminal excess themselves and probably would have admired the Nazis. The Romans had no problem at all with genocide and practiced it on numerous occasions - anyone met any Carthaginians lately? The German atrocity at Lidice (when an entire Czech village was wiped off the map in revenge for Heydrich's assasination) would have struck a Roman general as quite a normal response.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245