Nick Gillespie | March 28, 2007
You know it's time to say adios when you're the attorney general in a Republican administration and National Review is telling you to take a hike:
What little credibility Gonzales had is gone. All that now keeps him in office, save the friendship of the president, is the conviction of many Republicans that removing him would embolden the Democrats. It is an overblown fear. The Democrats will pursue scandals, real or invented, whether or not Gonzales stays. But they have an especially inviting target in Gonzales. He cannot defend the administration and its policies even when they deserve defense. Alberto Gonzales should resign. The Justice Department needs a fresh start.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
And another one gone, and another one gone
Another one bites the dust
Hey, Im gonna get you too
Another one bites the dust...
here's to AG # 3
This moose isn't a fan of either AG under bushie. (I think
Asscroft was the most evil in the admin at first)... But why didn't
Reno resign? She shoulda. grrr. She was a fairly disgusting AG, to
put it mildly...
And was Dicky Thornburgh ousted cuz of Ruby Ridge? Or did he go
naturally?
grumble.
All that now keeps him in office, save the friendship of the
president, is the conviction of many Republicans that removing him
would embolden the Democrats.
This must have been a mistake in the editing process. I think what
they meant to write was:
All that now keeps him in office, save the friendship of the
President, are the potential convictions of many Republicans which
would follow under a competent attorney general whose appointment
would be approved by emboldened Democrats in the Senate.
Just wait; I predict President Giuliani's Attorney General, one B Kerik, will make Gonzales look positively Solomonic.
Maybe I'm too cynical, but it seems highly unlikely to me there
would BE a new Attorney General. There's only a year and a half
left, why would Bush bother to find someone the (emboldened and
sassy) Dems would approve? Why not just ride out the string with
the Deputy AG taking over the reigns?
Is there something requiring Bush to put himself out there on this
one?
the DAG bio, FYI:
http://www.usdoj.gov/dag/dagmcnultybio.htm
No one Gonzales him because he's a complete moron -- at least two standard deviations below Corky from Life Goes On. . It's one thing to be involved in shady and possible illegal activities -- all politicians have a high tolerance for this fare -- but it's another thing to be an incompetent manager, a legal lightweight, and a PR retard. We elect this later category of dolts to Congress and the Presidency, but we expect our Attorney Generals to have at least a rudimentary grasp of the law.
Should have read "no one likes Gonzales because he's a complete
moron."
I guess I should proofread before calling people morons...
I am not surprised at the quality of performance turned in by
Gonzalez. I am mildly surprised at the political imcompetence (and
this US Attorney matter really is a story about political
incompetence) demonstrated by Rove. Now, I never bought into the
"Rove is a genius!" myth that existed once upon a time, but
goodness, he did oversee two successful Presidential elections, the
first one for a challenger who was facing an incumbent VP in a time
of extreme prosperity and the appearance of peace. That is
indicative of SOME political skill, skill which now appears to have
wholly disappeared.
Perhaps his opposition through 2004 was simply horribly inept.
Bet you they'll dig up someone worse.
Embolden is one of those words like "homeland" that I never heard
used in 30+ years of American english. I'm not convinced it's a
real word.
In the future it will be hard to field an all volunteer military
under the same reasoning they have for the past several hundred
years.
After all what will they claim your joining to defend exactly after
government has stripped us of our Freedoms and Rights and our way
of life is whatever way of life the current politician deem should
be our way of life according to their own beliefs.
It will be a hard sell to get someone to sign away their own
freedom to join the military to fight and defend freedoms that no
longer exist to begin with. Maybe the politicians will have to
fight their own wars in the future, which means we will have no
more wars because if they had to lead the convoy themselves into
places like Iraq the mission objective would quickly change.
The Justice Department needs a fresh start.
A fresh start. Well yeah, in the same way North Korea needs a fresh
start. When was the last time we had a AG that wasn't a straight-up
tin despot.
Whenever a President says that "Appointee X has my full and
complete confidence" it's hard to tell when he really means it, and
when it's a Fredo kiss.
I'm betting on Fredo kiss for Gonzales.
Regardless of her professional performance, Janet Reno did host one hell of a dance party!
"de stijl | March 28, 2007, 12:25pm | #
Regardless of her professional performance, Janet Reno did host one
hell of a dance party!"
final episode of
JRDP where she actually shows up!!!
Gonzales is nothing more or less than a Texas crony. I know that all administrations have a certain number of cronies--it's inherent in the system. But Bush seems to have outdone himself in this regard with Gonzales and the Miers debacle. I'm surprised his 10th Grade gym coach wasn't nominated for Education Secretary.
Since Bush doesn't seem to cast a very wide net when he makes
these appointments (Cheney, Gonzales, Miers), perhaps if I go stand
next to him I could be the next attorney general.
One year and 9 months...it's almost over. Of course, I get to wait
things out in a nice safe community; how many more soldiers will
die brutal deaths while Bush tries to save face on the total
disaster his administration has become?
All that now keeps him in office, save the friendship of the
president, is the conviction of many Republicans that removing him
would embolden the Democrats.
Is there a problem this administration has that can't be ignored so
as to avoid emboldening the enemy?
Jim Baker = Tom Hayden
Cheney = ?
Rove = ?
Pierce = whoever Andy Garcia was playing in Part 3
Jenna (or maybe not-Jenna) = whoever Sofia Coppola was playing in
Part 3
I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby sleeps with the fishes.
Andy,
A career Justice Department lawyer is likely to take the law too
seriously for George Bush's tastes, and have too little respect for
his royalist theories of presidential authority.
damn you Timothy, for beating me to the pun(ch)
Perhaps you need to embiggen your vocabulary.
Jim Baker = Tom Hayden I think you mean Hagen. Tom Hayden
was one of Jane Fonda's husbands. Of course, I never saw the
director's cut.
I make comment about military volunteers starting to wonder what
freedoms exactly it is they are protecting.
Then this morning I read about the Marines banning tatoos. Damn it
didn't take them long to add to the list of reasons you might not
want to give up your freedom to defend something vailed as
freedom.
My dad was a Marine and had two big Marine tatoos on his forearm.
If he were alive today he would be pissed.
I know this is not directly related to the AG story but really when
you think about it its all intertwined in that they are the machine
eating up our freedoms for their own advancement.
I get that joe, but is he really likely to be better than someone Bush can get through Congress right now? I mean, I'm not saying Bush will just sit on his ass all day, but the logical play for me here would be to continually nominate completely distasteful candidates you know have no chance of confirmed, then making hay out of the fact we can't get a new Attorney General because those Dems are playing partisan games with our nation's laws.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245