Nick Gillespie | March 27, 2007
The military's verdict on its role in the friendly fire death of the Afghan/Iraq War's most famous casualty:
Four generals and five other officers in Cpl. Pat Tillman's chain of command were responsible for "a series of mistakes" in reporting his friendly fire death, and their actions will be reviewed by a top Army officer, officials announced Monday.
However, an investigation by Army Criminal Investigation Command found that Tillman's death was an accident, and there was no evidence of negligent homicide or aggravated assault.
"We as an Army failed in our duty to the Tillman family," Acting Army Secretary Pete Geren said. "I apologize to the Tillman family, but words are not sufficient."
Tillman, 27, an Army Ranger, was killed April 22, 2004, in Afghanistan. An Afghan soldier fighting alongside Tillman also was killed, and two U.S. soldiers were wounded in the incident.
The Tillman story is an amazing, haunting one, partly because the former football standout at its center defied virtually every stereotype ascribed to him, perhaps especially the notion he was some sort of on-a-mission-from-God war hawk.
One of the very best magazines stories of last year (IMO) ran in Sports Illustrated and focused on Tillman's death and the effect it had on one of his Ranger comrades. Take an hour today to read it.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
From a news account:
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Pat Tillman's family firmly rejected the
Defense Department's findings into the former NFL star's
friendly-fire death in Afghanistan, calling for congressional
investigations into what they see as broad malfeasance and a
coverup.
"Perhaps subpoenas are necessary to elicit candor and accuracy from
the military," his family said in a statement Monday night, after
hearing the results of the latest probes.
I am with the Tillman family on this. Given th prevalence of lies
and coverups in gov't I am a bit surprised that HnR is
trying to have us buy into the whitewash, rather than questioning
the integrity of the new probes, as all libertarians should.
The SI article is most likely the best thing ever published by that magazine. I have it bookmarked and read it about once a month.
I don't understand why this issue won't go away. It is not that hard. Someone screwed up and shot a .50 caliber machine gun at their own people and one of the rounds hit Tillman. It was a sensless tragedy but the kind of thing that happens sometimes. Did they Army try to cover that fact up and make it look like he died from enemy fire rather than through a friendly fire screw up? Absolutely. The Army is terrible at public relations and always looking to score PR points. It is no different than when they covered up the fact that Jessica Lynch fucked up and got captured. It is what it is. Let the poor guy rest in peace.
I cannot help wondering how many similar stories have been successfully buried, because there was no "celebrity" factor.
I definatly disagree that this was a Pentagon directive down to
the field to make up a "pretty story" about a tragic
accident.
These things usually go in the other direction and until I see
evidence otherwise I am going with guys on the ground not wanting
to "look bad", or something even less than that.
No, not a criticism of what Nick wrote either.
"It is no different than when they covered up the fact that
Jessica Lynch fucked up and got captured."
Jessica Lynch didn't fuck up. The "fuck up" that sent the convoy
down the wrong road, leading to her capture as several deaths,
wasn't made by her, but by someone in one of the lead trucks.
I was not endorsing the Pentagon's version of events in any way, shape, or form.
"Jessica Lynch didn't fuck up. The "fuck up" that sent the
convoy down the wrong road, leading to her capture as several
deaths, wasn't made by her, but by someone in one of the lead
trucks."
That unit's heavy weapons were inoperable. It was an absolutely
terrible unit. She was a passenger, her humvee wrecked, she got
knocked out and captured. In absolute terms, she was knocked out,
so you are right Joe, she did not fuck up personally. Of course,
there was a person in her unit, you never hear about who fought to
the death and a black single mother who unlike Lynch actually
fought back before being was captured. Those people never got
million dollar book deals because they were not cute white girls
that looked good on camera.
You are right Joe. I shouldn't say she fucked up. She just in no
way deserved the media attention she got and what is worse she got
it and her book deal at the expense of people who accorded
themselves under fire much better than she did. Forgive me if that
clouds my judgement of her.
Honestly? I believe that it was an extremely patriotic,brave and honorable decision that Pat Tillman made in dropping everything and joining the service like he did. Yes, he was killed by friendly fire in the line of duty. Unfortunately that is a by product of war. People die in war. It is not pretty and it is not nice. However, I believe that his family by behaving the way that they are, weather it is out of grief or not, are doing their son an extreme injustice and are tarnishing who he was. I cant help but think that as pro-military as he was, and given the fact that he volunteered, he might have been aware of the risks involved and willing to make that sacrifice for something that he believed in strongly. He died honorably in the service of his country during wartime. Had the circumstances been criminal I could see some type of further action. But war is a very stressful, high adrenaline, kill-or-be-killed situation. Zero tolerance for mistakes or errors in that type of atmosphere is unrealistic.
I'm a bit confused about the idea of a white wash here. A guy was killed as a result of friendly fire. The pentagon is now saying it was friedly fire. What is the charge that this version is a cover up? Cover up of what? Is someone suggesting that we was shot by friendlies on purpose?
"These things usually go in the other direction and until I see
evidence otherwise I am going with guys on the ground not wanting
to "look bad", or something even less than that."
Good point Guy. I think in this case because of who Tillman was,
the Pentegon was a lot more willing to swallow the line from below
than they would have been normally. I am sure the guys on the
ground did not want to admit to shooting one of their own and
because it was Tillman the higher ups were very willing to believe
whatever story came up from the bottom.
Don't get sucked in to Dave's foolishness, Nick. He'll take your denial of endorsing the the Pentagon's version as proof of your secret endorsement of the Pentagon's version.
John,
"At the expense of?" I agree with most of the rest of what you
wrote, but "at the expense of?"
Yes, the skinny white blonde woman got more media attention, but
that reflects badly on the media, Pentagon, and White House, not on
her.
The best tool in modern war is the radio. It gets you help when
you desperately need it.
The worst curse in modern war is the radio. It lets someone who
can't see or smell the situation, and whose ass isn't on the line,
make decisions based on criteria inferior to accomplishing the
mission and surviving.
But Nick, without the stereotyped view of Tillman, how would we get left-wing screeds which show that their writer has no clue that Tillman's opinions on a lot of issues are ones that writer would agree with? They'd have to go somewhere else for material.
Re: Jessica Lynch.
I thought the big lie wasn't how she was captured (though that
doesn't surprise me). I thought the issue was that she was at a
hospital that tried to release her a couple times, and the U.S.
forces needlessly went in and shot up the hospital in some brave
"rescue" attempt that they really didn't need to undertake.
I never really followed it all that closely, though.
The Army screwed the pooch on this investigation. It screws the
pooch on a lot of investigations, and that's just the way that a
bureaucracy "functions" (to use the term loosely). Add battlefield
conditions and competing agendas to that bureaucratic incompetence
equation and it all - unsurprisingly to realists - goes to hell in
a handbasket faster than a politician can pick your pocket.
Having said that, Pat Tillman died in a tragic friendly fire
incident that should never have happened but happens in war-time
all-too-frequently.
Most of us look at the entire sad episode with the same kind of
regret any tragedy compounded by gov't incompetence as par for the
course.
Thankfully enough of the story surfaced to show that, as it turns
out, Pat Tillman was a real, three-dimensional person rather than
one of the 2-dimensional cardboard cut-outs that both right and
left tried to squeeze him into for their own political
agendas.
Rest in peace, brother. You certainly have earned it.
Seiltz,
Originally, the Pentagon gave her a Silver Star for fighting off
the attackers.
Which, as it turns out, she didn't do (no shame to her - her gun
jammed and she couldn't do anything). But the award was clearly a
PR stunt, and it was unfair to those people who were with her that
day who did distinguish themselves.
Following the demand for a Congressional review, one can expect
the inevitable civil lawsuit for a gajillion dollars. The new
lottery. Welcome to America.
CB
I was not endorsing the Pentagon's version of events in any
way, shape, or form.
I was suggesting that as a journalist, specifically as a
libertarian journalist, your duty might include raising reasonable
doubts about the pentagon's version.
It depends on how you see wahat the media's responsibility,
especially the libertarian media's, duties are vis-a-vid the US
government.
I am not saying that you need to be a 9/11 conspiracy theorist or
anything like that, but in this particular instance, something more
than a no-comment and a disclaimer of veracity would seem to be
appropriate. Especially because the linked story that you just
happen to be so fond of raises none of the doubts that should be
raised here either.
Jessica Lynch didn't fuck up.
I would wait until Estate of Flynt is hashed out before jumping to
that conclusion.
I thought the issue was that she was at a hospital that
tried to release her a couple times, and the U.S. forces needlessly
went in and shot up the hospital in some brave "rescue" attempt
that they really didn't need to undertake.
The Iraqi army had pulled out earlier the day of the rescue. Given
their recent departure and the war-time conditions, it would have
been the height of foolishness for the US forces not to go in hot.
I don't recall any Iraqis were killed or seriously injured during
the rescue.
I also have no idea how you could release a badly injured person
from a hospital and transfer them across an active war front, at
least not without calling a cease-fire first, which was never done
or attempted, as far as I know.
Is someone suggesting that we was shot by friendlies on
purpose?
I do think this is what the Tillman family is suggesting.
What is the charge that this version is a cover up? Cover up
of what? Is someone suggesting that we was shot by friendlies on
purpose?
Like Dan T. said, there is the suggestion that he was shot on
purpose. he may not have died in anything remotely resembling the
circumstances now claimed by the official story and SI.
There is also the possibility that somebody shot under criminally
negligent circumstances, like firing when there was a clear and
clearly understood order not to fire. Some friendly fire incidents
violate the rules of engagement and others do not. Some friendly
fire incidents violate the rules of military justice, while others
do not. Even, the presence of armed enemies (if any were really
there) do not mean you can just shoot whoever you want, however you
want.
I don't think it incumbent on the Tillman family to explain exactly
what happened before getting a decently transparent investigation.
I do think it is incumbent on Mr. Gillespie to evince a bit more
curiosity about the fishy story here than he yet has.
I think the two interesting questions that have been barely
touched in this discussion, and never fully explored, are:
1. Anyone who ever handled an automatic weapon knows how hard it is
to get two bullets to hit the same location on a target. Pat
Tillman died from THREE shots to the head, fired supposedly by
someone who was far enough not to recognize him as a US soldier.
Should that raise any questions?
2. Is the fact that the Army has given both Jessica Lynch and Pat
Tillman medals for actions they never took something to be
concerned about? Does this reflect on other medal-recipients?
Is the fact that the Army has given both Jessica Lynch and
Pat Tillman medals for actions they never took something to be
concerned about? Does this reflect on other
medal-recipients?
Not even
the slightest
bit...
"1. Anyone who ever handled an automatic weapon knows how hard
it is to get two bullets to hit the same location on a
target."
True.
"Pat Tillman died from THREE shots to the head, fired supposedly by
someone who was far enough not to recognize him as a US soldier.
Should that raise any questions?"
Say WHAT? Can you source this? maybe give a citation, a web-site,
or something to back this up? I hadn't hear this.
"2. Is the fact that the Army has given both Jessica Lynch and Pat
Tillman medals for actions they never took something to be
concerned about? Does this reflect on other
medal-recipients?"
Yep. Especially considering how many people do truly amazing things
and are never credited for it. It's definitely a problem - and
apparently has been since Washington started handing out Purple
Hearts.
Say WHAT? Can you source this? maybe give a citation, a
web-site, or something to back this up? I hadn't hear
this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Tillman
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245