March 13, 2007
In a feature from Reason's April issue, Malia Politzer spends a few days with the U.S. Border Patrol and watches America's immigration crisis go completely unsolved.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Where is the outrage at the coyotes and the Mexican government
not bothering to do anything about their treatment of the
underprivileged?
I really don't like that typical cop answer by Officer Vasquez,
that he has to round the illegals up or he will be fired. How about
it is your freaking job to enforce the law? Something more like 'I
can't let you go, you are in violation of US law and I am detaining
you.'
Terms like 'undocumented migrants' when speaking of illegal aliens
are about as meaningful as 'unregistered vehicle offenders' when
speaking of car thieves or 'undocumented bonuses' when speaking of
embezzlement. Until you get a law change, they are illegal
aliens.
And now for the Congress. If this is a real "crisis", why didn't
they increase the appropriate visa caps to some level that the
illegal alien supporters will be happy with? They have full control
of that and the Executive Branch is charged with enforcing that
limit, not the other way around (not accusing the writer of having
any confusion there at all, just a general discussion item).
Mr. Montag,
The "crisis" is that cheap labor may be bothering some voters. It
is a dodge away from health care costs (if we blame it on illegals,
the executive salaries won't be perused,) our stupid drug war (ask
the illegals who were shot to pieces on Tucson's West side a few
weeks back,) and the fact that we need people to work seasonal jobs
(even in Tucson, home construction has seasons.) Congress' crisis
is that it may lose votes.
As for Agent Vasquez' words: I work in government and have to
enforce sometimes-stupid rules. I feel for the customers I can't
help. I'm human, but it's my job. It's one of those things about
all sorts of jobs: people hate the rules, but usually follow
them.
As for the Border Patrol itself, I'm much more comfortable with
them there than I would be without them. They aren't effective at
controlling the border, but they do keep it from being out of
control. And if anyone claims it's already out of control, they
really lack imagination.
I'm no more outraged at coyotes than I am drug dealers. Both are a market response to our old buddies, supply and demand.
I'm no more outraged at coyotes than I am drug dealers. Both
are a market response to our old buddies, supply and
demand.
I am not outraged by the peaceful ones. The violent ones, on both
topics, I do have a problem with and think they should be dealt
with harshly. No, not harsh as the UN defines it either.
I am not outraged by the peaceful ones. The violent ones, on
both topics, I do have a problem with and think they should be
dealt with harshly.
We've been dealing with smugglers harshly since the 70s, and it
still isn't working. If your profession is illegal you can't use
law to resolve disputes and must resort to violence.
OTOH, invent an adequate guest worker system and end the war on
drugs, and coyotes and drug dealers will be supplanted by travel
agents and pharmacists.
I'd like to inser the "Is there anyway to enfore the border"
question here. Frankly. I'd like the situation stabilized. Then I
would like legal immigration simplified. I've had family members,
very recently, rejected on grounds that were purely a matter of
paperwork, but who decided to wait in line in order to stay legal.
I don't care what color, religion, nationality we are talking
about, as long as we are dealing with people who respect
laws.
But I'm tired of the notion that being for border control is tant
amount to racism. Maybe that's the case for some, but not for most
of the folks I know.
The current state of affairs -is- pointless. We should either do
something or admit that we aren't going to do anything, and stop
wasting resources.
Frankly. I'd like the situation stabilized. Then I would
like legal immigration simplified.
High fence. Wide gate.
Roughly what Bush has been pushing for, although he seems to want
the gate first.
Then I would like legal immigration simplified.
So would I, as long as "simplified" means "everyone is allowed
entry unless they are a security or public health risk."
But I'm tired of the notion that being for border control is
tant amount to racism.
Border control as currently practiced is more the result of
protectionism. Interestingly, as the protectionist arguments lose
credibility, the anxieties turn more and more to culturalism and
nativism.
OTOH, invent an adequate guest worker system and end the war
on drugs...
Good point. So here are my suggestions.
Given that the current legal alien admission is based on the "Green
Card" let me suggest two more.
First, the "Yellow Card". This card would be issued to any North
American wishing to seek work in the USA who could pay a fee
roughly equal to the current "coyote" price for crossing the
border. Part of this fee would be no-refundable to cover the cost
of paperwork to process the application. This cardholder would then
be able to seek work in the US and as long as he/she did not break
the law or seek public assistance he/she could stay in the country.
The remainder of the fee over and above the processing costs could
be refunded to the applicant upon their return to the old
country.
Second, the "Blue Card". This card would be issued to any North
American who had a corporate sponsor to work in the USA. In this
case the necessary fees would be paid by the corporate sponsor who
could the apply for a refund of the unused fees, etc. Upon the end
of the employment contract the immigrant would be required to
return home.
The fact of the matter is that many of the attitudes about
immigration are based on the attitude that immigrants want to be
citizens. The fact of the matter is that most don't. They
just want to make a few extra bucks before they go home. I think we
should take advantage of that and adjust policy accordingly.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245