Nick Gillespie | February 5, 2007
So Cartoon Network parent company Turner Broadcasting has agreed to "to pay $2 million compensation and apologize for their advertising campaign that caused a widespread terrorism scare" in Boston.
As part of the settlement, $1 million will be used to reimburse the agencies and $1 million will be used to fund homeland security and other programs. Turner Broadcasting, a division of Time Warner Inc., and Interference Inc. also will issue a public statement accepting full responsibility and apologizing for the incident.
"Last week's events caused a major disruption in the greater Boston area on many levels - crippling public transportation, causing serious traffic problems, negatively affecting local businesses and perhaps most significantly, costing Boston and surrounding communities thousands of dollars," [Attorney General Martha] Coakley said.
Whatever else this story is about, this much seems clear: Boston can no longer be taken seriously as a city. It alone--out of a total of 10 cities subjected to the same ad campaign--spazzed out like this.
Full details on the shakedown here.
David Weigel on "the Boston Two" here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
From a PR standpoint, TBS did the right smart
thing.
Notice I said "smart", not "right", and qualified it with "from a
PR standpoint."
I'm not even sure they did that. To paraphrase Michael Corleone, if the city of Boston says they spent $750,000.00, Why would they ever consider paying more than that? I don't like the precedent that they've set by doing so.
Does anyone still think that Boston is the navel of the universe (as Holmes, sr. thought of it back in the 19th century)?
"Boston can no longer be taken seriously as a city."
When did you take it seriously?
I don't know thoreau, I think their hair-obsessed representatives had it right. Treat the whole situation like the frick'n joke that it is. TBS just pissed away any street-cred they had going for them. And now that Boston has whined its way to a biscuit, expect it (and all those other cities) to start looking for excuses to throw a spazz.
An important fact that gets left out of the story is that, just after the Boston Police started to respond to these thingies, two dummy pipe bombs were found in a parking garage. None of the other 9 cities' police forces had that to take into account as they were decided what to do.
The good news is that this is one step closer to making "viral
marketing" a hanging offense, and that's worth a noble goal in and
of itself.
Oh, and terrorists? Next time you plant a bomb, paint
"GOLDENPALACE.COM" in big letters on it. Everybody will think it's
just another wacky promotion until it explodes. Hell, you might get
people gathering around to look at it.
Sometimes, Jesse, spineless is smart, at least in the short
term.
So we can both be right.
i don't know if they did the smart thing either.
this will be a good pr case study for the future, however.
dhex,
At the very least there a quite a lot of variables to consider
before one can come to a decision or not.
I recall something similar, perhaps on a smaller scale, happened in the Union Square subway station in NYC a couple of years ago. I recall the same stern lecture from the mustaches, but don't recall this kind of publicity.
The cost of a 30 second superbowl ad was $2.6 million, or at
least that was the figure I heard. TBS was able to get everyone
talking about their movie for a week, and more than compensated the
city of Boston for the money they spent. TBS received excellent
publicity, and no one can claim that they did not take
responsibility.
They got a deal.
THERE WAS A "REAL" PIPE BOMB HOAX THAT MORNING!!!!! If I was
Turner I wouldn't pay shit. As reported in the Boston Herald
someone left a fake pipe bomb in an office at a hospital and they
apparently found one attached to an overpass. It was only AFTER
(joe) they went on alert for those that they found the ad signs and
went ape shit. The ads didn't start the alert. I have yet to see
this fact reported on the news.
http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=180349
Well the article says it happened at the same time but I bet some investigation would show the ads were found after the fake pipe bombs.
Goddammit! Can just one public figure in this country refuse to
apologize for every trumped up claim of offense!
(Put your hand down, Bush. Yes, we know you never apologize for
anything. We want to hear from some of the other kids.)
"Oh, and terrorists? Next time you plant a bomb, paint
"GOLDENPALACE.COM" in big letters on it. Everybody will think it's
just another wacky promotion until it explodes. Hell, you might get
people gathering around to look at it."
You know what, those terrorists ought to go one better. They should
pack a car with explosives & park it there, and then all those
jokers who see garages full of cars, and don't see that each one of
them is a potential terror threat, will see what happens when you
don't take homeland security seriously.
I don't see how anyone could have lived through the first WTC
bombing & Oklahoma City and still leave Ryder trucks sitting
all over the place without shutting down the entire city to
investigate.
/sarc
"Whatever else this story is about, this much seems clear:
Boston can no longer be taken seriously as a city. It alone--out of
a total of 10 cities subjected to the same ad campaign--spazzed out
like this."
Three words, dipshit, regarding 9/11: Logan International
Airport
PS nothing makes a black girl laugh harder than seeing a fat
white-boy in dreds.
Sometimes, Jesse, spineless is smart, at least in the short
term.
Like when it was hard to really oppose the Iraq War in 2003 to
2005.
I'm a former metro Bostonian (not to be confused with
metrosexual). I've done a 720 degree spin on this one. First, as I
watched this unfold on the two ridiculously biased (it's ridiculous
that they claim to be fair and balanced on the on, and objective on
the other) cable news networks (i.e. CNN and FOX), my initial
feeling was ok, there is no bomb in these packages or
devices, so whoever put up this hoax should get the maximum
sentence for this and that they were totally irresponsible, with no
telling who might have been unable to get to a hospital or some
such due to a closed bridge.
Then I did a 360 when I learned that Boston's "authorities" freaked
out over what were effectively neon ads. I also had no trouble
believing Mayor Menino was a total dunce, loser, pinhead blowhard.
That was the mayor-for-life I remembered from half a dozen years
ago.
I also was giving serious consideration to trying to find this
cartoon on my quasi-900+ cable channel lineup and giving it a look
just to do my part to compensate the real victim of all this. I
also was probably going to try to buy a t-shirt with that character
with his "you're number one" universal sign language on it.
But I just recently did another 360 degrees now that those
Spineless. Corporate. Weasels. paid of that coercive
scumbag Menino. Now there is no way in Hell I'll dream of watching
that show or getting the t-shirt.
In my opinion everyone involved just plain sucks except for the
Boston Two. Those guys are my heroes for
appropriately acting inappropriately at their press conference
after their legal hearing.
Three words, dipshit, regarding 9/11: Logan International
Airport
Yeah, that's why I thought it was acceptable when NYC issued a
general evacuation order after they discovered the signage.
Two million dollars, huh. So the City of Boston is more than reimbursed for any money that might have come out of its coffers. So when can the good taxpayers of Boston expect their tax rebate checks?
An important fact that gets left out of the story is that,
just after the Boston Police started to respond to these thingies,
two dummy pipe bombs were found in a parking garage.
I've seen no solid confirmation of the timeline. I have seen
reports that the four calls to BPD regarding suspicious devices
were all in relation to the actual suspicious devices. Beyond the
initial notice of suspicion regarding the ATHF signage (from a
subway commuter?), I've seen no other evidence that the general
public was calling in threat reports about the ATHF signage.
THIS will make those slimy terrorists think twice. Sure, they can raise enough money to plant the bombs. But can they afford the $2 Million fine the city will slap them with afterword. Can they!??!
Boston's shining moment came two centuries ago. It was a brief
moment. The Tea Party and the Libety Bell stories...
Now it's as relevant as Iceland's third largest city... (can't
remember the name)
happyjuggler0,
I agree with you, but you're spinning too fast. When you reverse
your position on something, you are doing a 180. A 360 is just a
pirouette and leaves you looking the same way you started.
Of course, my understanding is that the fake pipe bombs were
planted by a "disgruntled employee", who has neither been arrested,
or had his existence publicized.
That apologists for the gang called the "Government of the City of
Boston" and their godfather "Mumbles Menino" think this is a point
in their favor gives me a chuckle.
Arresting the installers for Adult Swim is kind of like invading
Iraq because you can't catch Osama Bin Laden.
In defense of Boston's emergency agencies, there were two things
in operation that were not in place elsewhere:
1) The devices were placed on bridge abutments and other
transportation-sensitive locations.
2) The devices had been placed later in Boston than elsewhere, so
they were still new in that city. (It is true that they were
nationwide elsewhere.)
In light of those two things, it's harder (but not impossible) to
say that the police overreacted, especially considering the
aforementioned REAL hoax bomb threat.
Hafnarfjörður is the third most populous town in Iceland, after
Reykjavík and Kópavogur, with a population of 23674.
(Bear in mind that Iceland's population only reached 300,000 last
year, 2/3 of whom live in the capital).
Now everyone will kindly secure a sizeable bond just in case you
accidentally leave your lunch bag on the bus one day. And this is
my fave:
"...$1 million will be used to fund homeland security and other
programs."
So this shakedown will potentially fund more off-the-wall
stupidity? And did I gather correctly that a Coast Guard cutter was
dispatched to combat the litebrite invasion?
smartass sob:
According to this
story, Boston knows what's best to do with the money:
"It is our hope that these funds will cover not only the
expenses incurred by the many agencies who participated in the
response and investigation of the devices discovered in the Boston
area last Wednesday, but they will also enable our communities to
enhance homeland security, or to pursue other important community
initiatives."
What exactly does the phrase "pursue other important community
initiatives" mean?
At least I have an episode of Rome to look forward to
tonight...
As a New Yorker, I have to make sure to pick up a Mooninite t-shirt before the first Yanks-Red Sox game of the year.
If TBS has agreed that they're responsible and are willing to pay the compensation to Boston, what's the problem?
taktix,
I totally got into Rome the first season. I love how all the
ancient Romans speak modern British. Gives it that PBS costume
drama feel. Octavian is the only character I have any interest in
anymore. Last week sucked because he wasn't in it. I look forward
to his return and subsequent vanquishing.
I'm sure we'll still have Titus and Lucius kicking around. I found
them to be a fine devise in the first season, but they've grown
tiresome and unsympathetic.
"An important fact that gets left out of the story is that,
just after the Boston Police started to respond to these thingies,
two dummy pipe bombs were found in a parking garage."
Joe, I assume that these dummy bombs also had large, brightly-lit
blinky-lights in the shape of Ignignokt and Err?
They were, no doubt, placed somewhere conspicuous.
"""1) The devices were placed on bridge abutments and other
transportation-sensitive locations."""
Those are common places for ads.
2) The devices had been placed later in Boston than elsewhere, so
they were still new in that city. """
I believe they were up for three weeks, no?
@Jesse Walker
Spineless.
Corporate.
Weasels.
Well, yes. I used to work for them a number of years ago - when
they had offices in Chicago and they were still Time Inc.
(pre-Warner), we happy serfs used to refer to the Time-Life
building there as the "Cocksucker Plaza".
As painful as it might be to see anyone knuckle under to Boston, if
anyone deserves their clock cleaned, Time Inc. does.
It was pretty typical of most large companies run by liberals -
they made a big production out of their concern for humanity in the
aggregate, while treating the individual members of that species
like dog-meat.
Look at the bright side - this was one of those situations where no
matter which of the combatants got shafted, you could still
cheer.
Does anyone still think that Boston is the navel of the
universe
Bostonians? My own personal opinion, based on having attended
scores of baseball games in Anaheim and Chicago when the Red Sox
were the visiting team, there is no lower form of life than a Red
Sox fan seeing his/her team play on the road. They define the term
"belligerent asshole", and trust me, it's tough to stand out acting
like as such at a White Sox game.
I believe they were up for three weeks, no?
I think the facts are sketchy, and I could be completely wrong, but
my understanding is that they had been up for a while, but the one
that caused the panic had been placed fairly recently.
Still, the fact that the whole thing probably could have been
averted if someone had just asked a random 17-23 year old what the
blinky thing was is pretty good evidence that they overreacted. And
quite frankly, the overreaction by law enforcement was somewhat
forgivable. It's the enormous overreaction by the local and state
government, born purely from embarrassment, that's really
pathetic.
I'm disappointed to learn that Turner caved, but maybe they felt
the publicity was well worth the $2MM. It's their money.
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▐▌░░░
░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▐▌░░░
░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░████░░
░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒░░░░░░░░██░░░
░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒██▒▒▒████▒▒▒▒▒████▒▒▒██▒░░░░░░░░██░░░
░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░██░░░
░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒████████░░░
░░░░░░██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██████████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░██░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░
░░██░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░
░░██░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██████░░░░██████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
$1 million will be used to reimburse the agencies and $1
million will be used to fund homeland security and other
programs.
OMFG!11!!
Great, so now an inept, ham-fisted organization gets more money as
its reward for being inept and ham-fisted. The horror...the
horror...
"An important fact that gets left out of the story is that,
just after the Boston Police started to respond to these thingies,
two dummy pipe bombs were found in a parking garage."
And there was a shooting, several assaults, four car accidents, a
rape, and a convenience store robbery around that time as well.
Come to think of it, they should have called in the national guard
and instituted martial law. Clearly, the good citizens of Boston
were under siege.
TTGIRL
Three words, dipshit, regarding 9/11: Logan International
Airport
So...doesn't that make Boston officials look like even bigger
idiots? Hordes of angry, Arab males with terrorist backgrounds are
storming onto airplanes while the entire Boston "crime" fighting
apparatus is standing behind a bomb-proof shield, detonating a
cardboard cartoon character with two d-cells and lights around
it?
1. Was there any indication whatsoever on the devices that it
was an ad? Like a sticker saying "for any questions, call....." and
providing contact information. If not, irresponsible.
2. Why didn't the ad people contact the administration beforehand
and let them know what they were doing?
3. Obviously none of you have lived in densely packed cities that
have lived through terrorist attacks. I have--Tokyo and London. I'd
rather the authorities "overreact" rather than the other way
around.
Turner deserves it. Boston is the kind of city his politics envision.
grumpy realist:
True, perhaps there should have been some contact info. Given that
the ad campaign was, technically, littering, I suppose that would
explain why they didn't have any contact info on the ads. As for
"why didn't they contact the administration beforehand", I suspect
it's partly a) because it was technically illegal, and b) nobody
expected the authorities to be quite that dumb. And, as we saw, 9
out of 10 weren't that dumb. I see crap by the side of the road all
the time, yes, including by bridges. Do you contact the authorities
every time you throw something out?
And don't play the "if you'd seen what I've seen" card with us.
It's both ignorant and rude of you to assert that
obviously no one is capable of taking this seriously
except you. I was half a mile away from the WTC. My girlfriend was
working next door to the WTC. (She was fine, fortunately.) But you
know what? The authorities were fuck-all use. They couldn't prevent
the attacks in NYC, London, or Tokyo. (I notice that they did
manage to trample on the 4th Amendment and execute an innocent man,
though.) And freaking out over some LiteBrites is not going to
prevent the next attack, either.
Big fucking deal. $2 million is chimp change to Turner
Broadcasting, especially since they will make that back when the
Aqua Teen movie comes out later this year.
Like I said, brilliant advertising.
So when do we get an apology from the city fathers of Beantown for acting like a bunch of power-mad buffoons?
I can only imagine the thought processees of Bostonians:
Oh look, blinky lights.
Blinky lights?
BLINKY LIGHTS! EVERYBODY PANIC!
EVACUATE THE CITY, CALL THE BOMB SQUAD: WE. HAVE. BLINKY.
LIGHTS!
This should go down in history, immediately after the Battle of
Bunker Hill as the Battle of the Blinky Lights.
The shame. The damn shame.
If Turner Broadcasting accepted "full responsibility," does that
get the two street artists off the hook?
Frankly, as idiotic as the cable news networks were, they cannot
compare to the thundering blowhards in the DA's office, who happen
to have the actual authority to destroy people's lives.
As for TTGirl's "Logan International Airport, dipshit," I'll
counter with "World Trade Center, dipshit." New York City, for all
that it had, perhaps, greater cause to remember 9/11 than Boston,
managed to get through the Mooninite crisis without shutting down
any major transportation arteries.
This is about the city officials covering embarassment with
aggression. Nothing more.
For crying out loud people. There were 2 REAL "fake pipe bombs" found that day. Then they saw these and freaked out.
Then maybe they should spend their resources going after the people who planted the fake pipe bombs instead of making asses out of themselves by thundering against lite-brites.
A few months ago here where I live (Koblenz, Germany) they found
a real bomb in a large backpack on a train that stopped in our main
train station. It failed to go off because the detonator had not
worked correctly. They shut down the train station and removed the
bomb, checked the other trains on the line, and then resumed
service. Strangely, when other backpacks were seen around the city
the authorities failed to panic and shut the city down.
The reaction in Boston, compared to the reaction here, was
completely overwrought.
On the other hand, also a few months ago in another part of Germany
someone found some colored jello left over from a wedding that had
been thrown out on the side of the road and called out the
hazardous disposal team. So it's not limited to Boston.
The biggest problems I have with the Boston authorities are:
1. They didn't actually make sure the things were dangerous before
causing massive disruptions and headaches. However, I can
understand the "better safe than sorry argument" so I won't belabor
that point too much.
2. They held Turner et al liable for their overreaction. This part
really bothers me because there was clearly no intent on the part
of Turner et al to cause a panic, nor was it reasonable to assume
that "lite-brite" style advertisements hung up at various points
was going to cause a bomb scare. To me, this is the same level of
foobar as someone climbing over your fence, walking across your
perfectly flat lawn, falling down and breaking his leg, and then
suing you damages. The Boston authorities went after Turner simply
because they could, because they wanted to deflect attention away
from their own incompetence and powerlessness* and because they
knew they could get away with it and shake money out of the
company.
Sure, it was smart for Turner in this one instance and for
them to settle for what is to them a small amount, but it is
bad for the rest of us that they did this.
* They would have been shown to be incompetent and powerless even
if they had been bombs, because the things had been up for a while
and would surely have already detonated before ever being
noticed.
Paul, who wouldn't possibly err on the side of caution when he
doesn't know if there is a campaign of diversions going on as part
of a terrorist attack, writes: "And there was a shooting, several
assaults, four car accidents, a rape, and a convenience store
robbery around that time as well."
Exactly none of which have anything to do with simulated explosive
devices. Unlike two phoney pipe bombs, which actually are simulted
explosive devices.
Exactly none of which have anything to do with simulated
explosive devices.
Just like Lite Brites.
Exactly none of which have anything to do with simulated
explosive devices.
If there was a shooting, the shooting would have to occur with a
real explosive device (a gun), not a simulated one.
Obviously none of you have lived in densely packed cities that have lived through terrorist attacks. I have--Tokyo and London. I'd rather the authorities "overreact" rather than the other way around.
Maybe you should change that handle to "grumpy sheep".
Von Ribb,
Cops look for escalating patterns. First, silly blinky signs. Then
fake pipe bombs. The cops didn't know that they weren't
connected.
I still think they overreacted, and can't believe nobody realized
they were a marketing campaign, but the presence of the real fake
bombs makes Boston's reaction a bit less outlandish, and explains
at least some of the difference between their response and the
other 9 cities.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245