Nick Gillespie | January 31, 2007
Crikey!
Australia is taxing brothels, leading to this sketchy AFP story via
Yahoo News that foreign backpackers and students are flat on their
outbacks, "especially" in "northern Queensland." Bonus points for
weak sources, no stats, magical pic (on right),
and strange use of English ("overheads"?):
Many young tourists to sun-soaked northeastern Queensland state were making a quick buck as black market prostitutes, undermining registered operators' attempts to uphold health and safety standards, the Queensland Adult Business Association's Nick Inskip claimed....
Having fewer overheads, they could often undercut the legal sex industry on price, making it harder for the state's 23 legal brothels to make a profit, he said.
"They can charge less because they are not paying GST (goods and services tax), staff costs for managers and receptionists," Inskip said.
The tax office, which recently began a drive to collect tax from the industry, was also hard pressed to keep tabs on their undercover activities, he said....
Although prostitution at registered brothels is legal in many parts of Australia, recent research suggests the taxman's attempts to target the industry has sparked an exodus towards riskier illegal sex work.
Academics have also noted that the crippling cost of higher education in Australia has forced some foreign students to seek work as illegal prostitutes to make ends meet.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Tourists are making the quick bucks? What kind of college
students goes on vacation and literally whores him/herself? Are
they treating these as short term jobs while on break? The whole
story is quite sketchy indeed.
I know the creepiness factor rises pretty high pretty quickly at
times here, so I hesitate to do this, but...
Where is that photo from? Is that a still from a movie about a
brothel or a publicity photo from an actual Australian brothel or
what? I ask because I am impressed. It is sexy but not raunchy.
Good choice.
One hardly knows where to begin.
So, is Australia to be commended for taxing and regulating rather
than flat outlawing this business? Condemned for its discrimination
against foreign workers? Or laughed at for getting itself into this
predicament?
I love gratutitous nudity, however considering the time of day and the amount of people who read and post from work that picture could get H&R visitors in trouble.
Heh, also wanted to draw attention to the adds that comeup on the right of the screen with this post.
Aussie accents are fantastic, granted, but who wants to whore themselves during their own vacation?!?
who wants to whore themselves during their own
vacation
umm, someone who's run out of money, wants to stick around, and
enjoys sex with strangers?
> Academics have also noted that the crippling cost of higher
education...
The crippling cost? No bias there...
Having fewer overheads
Strange English indeed. I suspect that what they really meant to
say was having lower overheads, which of course (!?)
refers to a popular sexual technique.
But clearly fewer overheads is not a great selling point for a
whorehouse.
:)))
You've got to remember that backpackers are often doing this as a year-long break before/after uni, so they often take on bit-work jobs to make some cash before going back to the getting stoned and hanging around part of their lifestyle. I've certainly never heard of anybody actually whorin' it up, but it's not implausible, on the face of it.
A big part of the motivation for decriminalizing prostitution in
Australia was to eliminate the police corruption that goes along
with any illegal activity that people want to engage in.
But there are bugs in the legislation. For instance:
- Sex workers are not allowed to make house calls. In effect,
office rental is a requirement for legal brothels. Office rental
increases overhead costs. (I guess Nick's PhD in English did not
cover British and Australian English usage.)
- Unprotected sex is not allowed. smh.com.au recently reported that
"Nine councils across Sydney have paid private detectives $25,000
to have sex with prostitutes to gather sufficient evidence against
illegal brothels".
Councils paid contractors to have sex. Got that?
"I love gratuitous nudity, however..."
The only place nudity is "gratuitous" is in Antarctica. If we
humans stop desiring sex and the wondrous sight of naughty bits
then we've our species has lost the privilege of existing.
That said, it's no wonder that many Fundamentalists oppose sexual
freedom given their doomsday desire for the world to end.
No, on to the topic at hand...
This is the one thing that's bothered me about the whole "legalize
vice and tax it/regulate it" wing of libertarian thought. OK, let's
say we follow do just that: We legalize prostitution and tax it
order to pay for the State to make sure the sex workers are
STD-free and are using contraceptives. OK, how much is that tax
going to be? Will it be low enough so that the average, lonely,
working-class Joe (like myself) could still afford a few ours of
carnal bliss, or will the new taxes drive the price up to Vegas
brothel levels, were a "party" can run upward anywhere around
$5000-$10,000?
Since the dateless guy making $12 an hour probably as much desire
for sex as the CEO for a Fortune 500 company, the market is going
to respond. Unregulated prostitutes and brothels are going to
spring up, and will become targets for law enforcement, while the
Up-scale prostitutes get to ply their services with the assurance
that they have their own little state-protected oligopoly on
on-demand sexual gratification.
This is exactly what we're seeing in Australia.
highnumber,
Not sure, but it reminds me a lot of the photos from Viking Exotic Resort in the Dominican
Republic. I can't exactly visit the site from work but will try to
verify it later.
"Unprotected sex is not allowed. smh.com.au recently reported
that "Nine councils across Sydney have paid private detectives
$25,000 to have sex with prostitutes to gather sufficient evidence
against illegal brothels".
Note to self: Make immediate move to Australia. Seek work as
private detective.
Akira,
Bingo! I expect to see an increase in back-alley prostitution in
Amsterdam due to the "crackdown" by Dutch authorities
last Novemeber as well. Taxing and Regulating any item is a
very fine line, particularly when the item is easily
produced(cannabis, moonshine) or is simply an act of labor(physical
love, waiting tables, construction). Just like prohibition of the
act or item drives the price high enough to create a black market,
if tax levels are too high a black market will be created as well
only with a state sanctioned and protected "higher market".
Academics are complaining about the cost of education. Are they asking for a pay cut?
What about those damn libertines who give it away for free? Why
not blame them for making it harder for brothels to turn a profit
from turning tricks?
Anyway, i was reminded of a ridddle:
Q. Why is a one story brothel more profitable than a two story
brothel?
A. Less overhead.
In this case, Austrialia legalized prostitution (a good thing),
but unfortunatly over-regulated it to the point that your average
person cannot afford the legal alternative (which is a bad
thing).
It would be like legalizing weed, but setting the minimum cost of
weed to be $1,000,000 per kilo. You have, for all practicle
purposes, only legalized week for the ultra rich.
"It would be like legalizing weed, but setting the minimum cost
of weed to be $1,000,000 per kilo. You have, for all practicle
purposes, only legalized week for the ultra rich."
If drugs are ever legalized, that is what they will do; create a
way for the rich to get off and the poor to still go to jail.
> It would be like legalizing weed, but setting the minimum
cost of weed to be $1,000,000 per kilo.
Not exactly. Here is a google listing of some rates.
And to think I passed up that opportunity to move to Australia for work! (I know what you're thinking. I mean computer work. Ha ha.) Seriously, I was kind of aware of this already. AFAICT, it's working out OK. You do not, contrary to some people's expectations, see "JOE'S HOUSE OF WHORES" on every street corner and women are not, so far as I can see, being kidnapped to be sold into sexual slavery. Why would they be? The brothels advertise for positions (no pun intended) like any other business and make a big deal out of how safe and clean they are. Take a look at jobs available at Stiletto and why it's so great to work there. (Links are arguably work-safe, but I can't vouch for anything you might click on from there.) If they can offer bennies like that, they must be doing OK.
JD, That link is great. I couldn't resist clicking on the button that said Our Ladies Come First
According to the Yahoo story, the image at the top of this page is of the Daily Planet brothel in Melbourne.
"Nine councils across Sydney have paid private detectives
$25,000 to have sex with prostitutes to gather sufficient evidence
against illegal brothels".
Gives a new meaning to the term "private dick."
JD--
I noticed on the jobs available page it says, "training provided".
Hmmm. I wonder if I could get a job as a trainer...
"In this case, Austrialia legalized prostitution (a good
thing), but unfortunatly over-regulated it to the point that your
average person cannot afford the legal alternative (which is a bad
thing)."
So it's like trying to legally buy a machinegun in the US.
Technically it's legal, but the fed-mandated cap on supply has
driven prices into the range of tens of thousands of dollars.
Don't get me wrong though, I think prostitution should be 100%
legal. However the challenge is to make sure that the bluenoses
don't to regulate it out of existence (de facto prohibition) or
artificially turn it into a luxury service while at the same time
making sure sex work is still safe for both the client and the
prostitute.
I understand that the erotic movie industry has a private system in
place to provide regular check ups for their performers to make
sure they're STD-free. Perhaps a similar system could be put in
place for future legalized prostitutes (assuming the price is not
prohibative).
Now watch, one of H&R's resident statists will swoop down and
proclaim that for-profit regulatory organizations will always be
corrupt and that immaculate, infallible, and incorruptible
government agencies should be the ones peaking up hooker's
skirts.
If drugs are ever legalized, that is what they will do; create a
way for the rich to get off and the poor to still go to jail
That is the system we have now with illegal drugs
That is the system we have now with illegal drugs
It's the system we have for prostitution right now. The police only
tend to target street walkers, massage parlors, and in-house sex
workers while they tend to leave the high-end escort services sex
rings alone, that is unless the local DA wants to look good on for
an upcoming election, or the owner missed a bribe.
An Australian brothel listed on the stock exchange down there, not too long ago.
"An Australian brothel listed on the stock exchange down there,
not too long ago."
Did the stocks rise in heavy trading? Or did they go down?
Looks like I'm the first Australian to post..two things:
- "overheads" is in common use here to mean what it sounds like;
ie, the various miscellaneous expenses incurred in operating a
business.
- Most of our backpackers are of European or Asian origin and have
more (dare I say it) liberal sexual attitudes than their American
cousins. So it's not as implausible as you might think.
cheers,
Len
(who lives around the corner from Stiletto, coincidentally)
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245