Reason.com

Print|Email

New at Reason

Jacob Sullum tries to make sense of the presidential policy on wiretaps.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.

uncle sam|1.24.07 @ 11:21AM|

Or perhaps his contempt for the people.

|1.24.07 @ 11:52AM|

Well, dear Mr Sullum,

as it seems, 72 hours are not a lot of time when it comes to the surveillance of foreign intelligence TODAY -- as opposed to the good old days of the cold war.

You see, it takes quite a bit of time to translate communications from Arabic, Pashto, Kafiri, Urdu, Farsi-e Darbâri etc. into English, not to to mention the task of analyzing said communication.

If I remember rightly from the 9/11 report, it usually takes up to two weeks for the FBI to get translated transcripts of wiretaps in urgent cases, due to the lack of linguists. Perhaps the NSA is faster, however I doubt it -- this kind of work can not be done by computers, so a lot of numbercrunching muscle doesn't mean much.

Mike Laursen|1.24.07 @ 6:57PM|

One could argue that a lack of linguists to quickly translate transcripts in urgent cases is a sign of mismanagement, lack of foresight, and misplaced priorities in FBI management. In fact, I'll just go ahead and argue that.

advertisements

Get Reason E-mail Updates!

Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptions

Site comments/questions:

Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:


(310) 367-6109

Editorial & Production Offices:

3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245