Reason.com
More Polldancing
The second-most interesting poll of the day, after the one Brian links, is the "straw poll" up at Pajamas Media. Note that it includes South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, who is not running, and excludes Rep. Ron Paul, who is. Not that there are any libertarians who read blogs or anything.
If someone wants to prove that PJM isn't some elaborate Bialystock-and-Bloom scam, please, go to it.
Most Popular Stories
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
- When Government Privileges Trump the Rights of Citizens (5.25)
- Is the Ron Paul the Best Hope for Progressives? (5.25)
- Rand Paul Amendment to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Raiding Farms Fails, 78-15 (5.24)
- Friday Funnies (5.25)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|1.22.07 @ 1:56PM|#
"excluses"?
|1.22.07 @ 2:25PM|#
Thank you.
|1.22.07 @ 2:29PM|#
I posted a comment about not having Rep. Paul on there, I'm sure it won't get put up. But it's worth a try
brian423|1.22.07 @ 2:38PM|#
If someone wants to prove that PJM isn't some elaborate Bialystock-and-Bloom scam, please, go to it.
How did Adolf Hitler do in the poll?
|1.22.07 @ 2:55PM|#
Too bad we can't write-in our selection.
|1.22.07 @ 4:08PM|#
This will be very distorted just by letting you, even urging you strongly, to vote for one of each. When I look at their list of candidates, there are almost none, in either party, I can stand to think of as Pres., let alone actually vote for. My guess, though, is that most people will pick the person they find least offensive on the other side. The result? Complete distortion of who the parties actually favor.
Anachronym|1.22.07 @ 5:11PM|#
I call shenanigans. Dennis Kucinich is polling third? With 14%? In his dreams, maybe...
|1.22.07 @ 6:33PM|#
I noticed that over at politics1, the poll also excludes Dr. Paul.
|1.22.07 @ 7:36PM|#
David,
It hasn't even been a year since your last Max Bialystock reference, but I still love it.