Jeff Taylor | January 17, 2007
Very Little, as in Rich Little, your host for this year's White House Correspondents Association dinner.
Fresh off his 1976 television show, The Rich Little Show aired by the National Broadcasting Company until later in 1976, Little has recently hit the Indian casino circuit.
In 2003 Little released what was billed as "a patriot treat for every generation" in the form of a DVD called The Presidents. The 122 minute disc features Little doing nine presidents and various other Washington staples, like Walter Cronkite and David Brinkley. Throughout Little promises "a deep respect for the Oval Office while dramatically reflecting our country, our culture and ourselves."
Think this approach was attractive to the Beltway crowd who last year got hit right between the eyes by Stephen Colbert? E&P reports:
"My approach is to try to make it a comfortable venue that is enjoyable, funny and interesting," said Steve Scully, president of the White House Correspondents Association, who chose Little. "But you don't want to offend anyone." He cited the slogan for the Washington Gridiron Dinner, which says, "singe, don't burn."
Another scribey, Ron Hutcheson of McClatchy Newspapers, advises that, "We don't need to have a blogfest and a partisan slugfest after the dinner. We don't need that."
Ah, yes -- actual news and national interest. No need of that. No need of the most serious and direct criticism of Beltway newsgathering in, oh, forever. And newspapers wonder why more and more people are deciding they do not need newspapers.
Have fun folks. Bringing Little in after Colbert is like having Pat Boone follow the MC5. Too little, too late -- and too telling.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
This makes sense, it's kind of like what the NFL did with the Super Bowl after the whole NippleGate. Who'd they bring in the next year? Paul McCartney.
"We don't need to have a blogfest and a partisan slugfest
after the dinner."
Well, Colbert's uncharacteristically pathetic routine truly bit the
big one, as did his predecessor's, so maybe a bit of vanilla ice
cream after the crab cakes will be a soothing and familiar
finale.
"Who'd they bring in the next year? Paul McCartney."
McCartney was actually a pretty good show.
I saw Rich Little back in the early 80s. He was still doing Nixon
(alot) and most of his various "impressions" sounded suspiciously
similar.
Hey, lighten up! The correspondents just want someone who will remind them of when they were middle-aged.
Colbert's uncharacteristically pathetic routine truly bit
the big one
Really? I thought it was pretty damn funny. Maybe it was just me
and Scalia laughing.
Brian, don't you know that you can't be cool if you like
something that other people like? You get pretension points for
hating something popular. It's like saying 'The problem with Borat
wasn't that it was offensive; it's that it wasn't funny at all.' Or
calling Braveheart 'the worst movie ever made.' Both of which I've
seen, often.
How can you have indy cred if you like something anyone else
likes?
For your information, I'm practicing my impression of Stephen
Colbert.
You're on notice... truthiness... truthiness...
isildur,
Oh, good, then at least I can get back a little indie cred, since
Braveheart and Gladiator are my least-favorite-movies ever. I am an
indie god!
Braveheart and Gladiator are my least-favorite-movies
ever.
You can't hate those movies. I was hating those movies before you
were born!
What's more offensive, Colbert making fun of the President, or the President joking about being completely wrong about one of the main rationales for the war? Too bad they can't keep him off the bill.
or the President joking about being completely wrong about
one of the main rationales for the war?
That was funny until I realized American soldiers were setting up
the punchline.
"Colbert's uncharacteristically pathetic routine truly bit the
big one."
Name someone who has done a more devastating routine at the White
House Correspondents Association Dinner, and I'll eat every page of
Swift on my bookshelves. The only one I can think of who's fit to
polish Colbert's codpiece was Franken circa 1997/8? Maybe the
satirical onslaught was just too much for you ed.
"Colbert's uncharacteristically pathetic routine truly bit the
big one"
You're certainly entitled to the opinion that Colbert isn't funny,
but how exactly was his routine "uncharacteristically pathetic"? It
was the same schtick he does night-in/night-out on his show. And it
was damn funny, IMHO.
He made fun of the POTUS, he made fun of the lapdogs in the press
and he pissed off Laura Bush. What more do you want?
On the other hand, I fully expect Rich Little to be
characteristically pathetic. The only thing that sucks worse than
clowns or magic is hacky impressions, and The Man of "A Thousand"
Voices delivers in spades.
Seriously, Rich Little? If they wanted to suck the funny out of the
room, they could have just brought back Imus. I mean, was Jerry
Lewis busy? Did Dom DeLuise not return their calls?
My favorite scene from Braveheart is when our 40-something hero goes out on a muddy date and the lass's father adresses him as "young Wallace". My sides ached.
"Braveheart and Gladiator are my least-favorite-movies
ever."
How can you even tell them apart?
Elliott,
It was uncharacteristically pathetic because his
routine usually delivers. On that particular night it fell flat. I
was uncomfortable for him, and disappointed. But then, no one,
ever, will dynamite the room quite like Imus did at Clinton's
bash.
pinko | January 17, 2007, 3:31pm | #
"Colbert's uncharacteristically pathetic routine truly bit the big
one."
Name someone who has done a more devastating routine at the
White House Correspondents Association Dinner
See above.
I thought Rich Little was an outstanding entertainer back in the
70's. Course I was a preteen at the time.
Braveheart bit because it was the typical Hollywood revision of
perfectly good history.
What I liked about Colbert last year, was his searing attack on
lapdog press. I think Jeff's got it right. "We're sorry, we didn't
know. Now that we understand that making fun of people can hurt
their feelings, we won't do it anymore".
I just really would love to hear Rich Little scream, "Kick out the jams, motherfucker!"
Sigh. That's back when Colbert was cool.
He jumped the shark bit time when he wimped out of his
heavily-promoted guitar challenge in the most unimaginative way
possible. Couldn't his writers have come up with something
better?!
Imus sucked. Calling someone a "scumbag" isn't funny.
Saying apparently complimentary things that, taken together, make
it clear that the the subject is a scumbag - that's funny. Imus was
just a little kid saying swear words.
Imus was just a little kid saying swear words.
And...his victim was the Clintons. Don't forget that,
joe.
"Braveheart and Gladiator are my least-favorite-movies
ever."
How can you even tell them apart?
Yeah, f'in aussies...they all look and sound alike...even when they
are affecting Scots and Spaniards!
That mumbling sound you just heard was everyone under 35 saying "who the fuck is Rich Little?"
"And...his victim was the Clintons. Don't forget that,
joe."
Given that he had such a rich vein of humor to mine, the fact that
he sucked so badly is even more damning..
I mean, Clintons = funny, I don't care who you are. How can you not
get a laugh out of that? Oh, right, you act like a jerk and forget
to tell jokes.
If Ron Paul becomes president, then I'd like to see Penn & Teller host the dinner. Actually, I'd like to see that no matter who occupies the White House.
Rich Little has done some funny bits like the meeting of the
former presidents to play poker.
Ford to Nixon: Dick, it's your turn to ante.
Nixon: Oh, pardon me, Jerry.
an exasperated Ford: I already did.
OK, maybe you need the voices to make it funny.
Still, if they truly want to suck the humor from this event, call
in Mark Russell.
I thought Rich Little was an outstanding entertainer back in
the 70's.
Well, they managed to bring back the rest of the Nixon gang to DC.
Seems fitting to resurrect a comedian from that era.
I was hoping for "Puppetry of the Penis".
A longshot, I know, but they could have invited 42 onstage for a
cameo.
Either that, or maybe Rush Limbaugh could appear and do some of his
impressions of the disabled.
I think they punted when they chose Little, and only picked him
because of the recent Ford/Nixon pardon nostalgia.
"...like having Pat Boone follow the MC5..."
Kick out the jams, boys and girls!
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245