Reason.com
New at Reason
Ronald Bailey discovers the distance that reputation and punishment go in explaining human behavior.
Most Popular Stories
- 5 Classic Teen Sex-and-Drug Freakouts: Rainbow Parties, Butt-Chugging, And So Much More (By Which We Mean Less) (5.27)
- Government Beneficiaries and Other Fairy Tales (5.26)
- Are We Headed for a Fight with China? (5.28)
- Lessons From the United Fruit Company (5.28)
- Do Organic Consumers Shop Exclusively at the Jerk Store? (5.26)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
Warren|12.8.06 @ 9:12AM|#
eBay
Larry A|12.8.06 @ 12:32PM|#
This could totally lead to global free trade, if we had any governments with a good reputation.
|12.8.06 @ 12:53PM|#
I'm sorry not to see this artical discussed more widely. Maybe it was just the topic of the posting, but man, this is a great piece. Sereiously, Ron, good article. I would not have been aware of the study you mentioned had I not read this, and that's exactly why I always come back to these pages. 'tis what Reason is all about!
|12.8.06 @ 12:54PM|#
I am also apologetic for my awful fat fingering and typos. ;)
|12.8.06 @ 1:25PM|#
A nifty study.
Another related piece...
"One of the primary ways that humans--indeed all primates--acquire territory is through "contests," or war. By sharing the costs of war, as well as its benefits, a group of altruists typically outnumbers and therefore defeats a less cohesive band of individuals. Thus, whereas individual natural selection would argue for the rise of the selfish, larger group dynamics showcase the triumph of the altruists. This latter type of selection also relies on that group sharing a large proportion of similar genes, because, in that case, altruists' genetic material persists in some form if they sacrifice themselves for others in war. This is the solution offered by Darwin in The Descent of Man and Bowles in a paper published in the December 8 Science."
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=5F489402-E7F2-99DF-38D34562DB09D0D5
|12.8.06 @ 5:00PM|#
Why not leave these posts -- writing witty one-liners for new Reason essays -- to Weigel, and let Radley, who just isn't as good at them, concentrate on more important things?
|12.9.06 @ 10:30PM|#
My wife has spotted a serious ommision. Try this change: before the 'game', the referee gets together with all the players but one and names him the Designated Scapegoat. His account is always short, the 'punishments' he gives out are randomly disregarded, and he rarely gets reputation points. Ought to make for an interesting game.