Cathy Young steadies her nerves for a look back at the scare tactics of campaign 2006.
Reason Magazine
Most Popular Stories
- Fox Business Network Cancels Judge Andrew Napolitano's Freedom Watch (2.9)
- It’s Enough to Literally Make Your Head Explode (2.3)
- The Second Amendment Cases the Supreme Court Doesn't Want to Hear (2.9)
- Breitbart on libertarians in 2012 (2.11)
- One Possible Reason There Are So Few Liberals, Starring Jonathan Chait. And Some Stuff About Tax Progressivity. (2.10)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Romney Most Electable Candidate, Yet Gingrich in Statistical Tie Among GOP Voters (1.31)
- Explaining Newt’s Second Surge (1.26)
- George Washington Would Beat Out Romney as Richest President; John Kerry Would Have, Too (1.25)
- New Poll: Americans Aren't Ready for Another War (1.20)
- 2012 Election Match Up: Romney Wins, Paul Might (1.13)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
D.A. Ridgely|11.14.06 @ 9:34AM|#
Young takes a courageous stand against fear mongering! Not that there aren't things we really should be frightened by, of course...
(So, how's the money in this columnist business, anyway?)
Dan T.|11.14.06 @ 9:54AM|#
So Young is against politicians warning voters about concerns that she later admits are "quite real"?
What are they supposed to talk about, then?
|11.14.06 @ 9:58AM|#
I'm trying to think of (significant) elections where the politicians do not use chicken-little rhetoric to work up the voters.
Tell me again - am I going to burn in a Bush-instigated nuclear conflagration? or will I drown in my own lungs after a terrorist bio-WMD?
If I surive that (or perchance they do not happen), what next? - do I starve to death after global warming destroys all arable cropland (or was that overpopulation?) - or do I just turn into a mindless zombie after I've been indoctrinated into Evangelical Christian "re-education" camps? Damn I'm confused.
I say bring all the BS on. Hopefully, my generation (X) - raised as post-Watergate, cynical of goverment; our parents did a whole-helluva lot more drugs, and their brains aren't fried eggs; inane TV commercials - is it the "Sale of the Century" again?; nope, the Cold War didn't turn nuclear like they said it would. Maybe we will be skeptical enough (and as we haved learned from history) - is that politicians predictions of doom are unfounded bullshit.
Fear of a terrorist behind every corner? Bullshit.
Fear of a global warming The Day After style Armageddon?
Bullshit.
Will that government solution work?
Bullshit.
Will that make-my-teeth-white, insta-lose-weight, whatever-gizmatic-product pitched from that company perform as promised?
Bullshit.
The more the sky doesn't fall, the more a certain libertarian position garners interest. Aren't we skeptics first? - we realize that both policital parties (hell, maybe even the big "L", too) are out to control us? that big corporations are sometimes the biggest impediment to a free market? that organized religion does not have the answers? and that group-think is a dangerous path?
Bring the doom-saying on. I'm gonna have a drink before they come and get me.
Sam Grove|11.14.06 @ 11:51AM|#
Consumers develop a tolerance for hyperbole, hence increasing hyperbole.