Jesse Walker | November 13, 2006
In India, the taxman has a new weapon:
Tax authorities in one Indian state are attempting to persuade debtors to paying their bills -- by serenading them with a delegation of singing eunuchs....
The eunuchs collected about 400,000 rupees on their first day of work, authorities said, sharing 16,000 rupees (£188) amongst themselves.
The BBC attributes the eunuchs' success to the fact that they "are feared and reviled in many parts of India, where some believe they have supernatural powers." I suspect it has more to do with good old-fashioned shame, and perhaps the subtle reminder that the government could always take more.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
This particular eunuch class is voluntary eunuchs, sort of pre-operation MTF transsexuals. It may be a reminder, but a subtler one.
That really takes some balls.
jf wins the thread.
perhaps the subtle reminder that the government could always
take more.
Jesse Walker finishes a strong second.
Yeah, it's early, but when you've got it you've got it.
This particular eunuch class is voluntary
eunuchs,...
One wonders why anyone would volunteer to be a eunuch when
according to the article eunuchs are "[o}ften unable to gain
regular employment".
In the U.S., the taxman tries to take an arm and a leg and a
gonad if possible from the taxpayer. At least in India, the taxman
understands how that feels.
Come to think of it, I'd give my left nut if I wouldn't have to pay
taxes ever again.
Isaac:
What I don't get is how anyone could tell the difference... it's
not like people have a tendency to walk around wearing signs that
say "I had my balls cut off".
I'd think a eunuch would be the perfect employee. No sexual
distractions = clear thought and focus. If it were reversable, I'd
get my balls cut off and go back for my PhD... unfortunately that's
not an option. Yet.
PS,
By the time you finished your PhD, they probably will have figured
out how to put 'em back. If I were you, I would have them removed
and hope for the best.
Isaac,
If you're a MTF transsexual who can't afford SRS, you may be best
served to get castrated. Especially if there's a culturally
acceptable group of people who do that, for you to live among.
One wonders why anyone would volunteer to be a eunuch when
according to the article eunuchs are "[o}ften unable to gain
regular employment".
They hold a special place and special religious powers. Once upon a
time, a eunuch presided over the birth of most children in India.
It's not talked up to outsiders, but I'm told that, especially in
rural areas, they still do. It's the same sort of lifestyle choice
that becoming a Catholic priest is in the West. Although, the
Indians seem to be a lot more serious about it...
Postmodern
Depending on the age at which the castration is performed eunuchs
do take on definite characteristics.
Before it was considered respectable for women to be stage
performers female parts in opera were sung by castrati. These were
men who had been castrated before reaching puberty and were
therefore able to keep their soprano voices. There are recordings
of the last of these from (I think) the twenties.
However unlike Indian eunuchs who "are feared and reviled in many
parts of India" European castrati were celebrated and moved in the
best social circles.
Of course I'm not exactly how the child who is castrated can be
said to have "volunteered" for this.
I'd think a eunuch would be the perfect employee. No sexual
distractions = clear thought and focus.
In the East slaves and servants were frequently castrated for
exactly that reason. Most notorious was the practice of using
eunuchs as harem attendants (for obvious reasons).
I am also told that mature males who are castrated generally retain
all or most of their sex drive. Hence castration of rapists which
was at one time fairly common in Scandinavia was a total failure
(except possibly as a means to humiliate the offender). Thus it is
important to perform the procedure at an early enough age.
I have also heard stories that wives in harems sometimes got sexual
satisfaction at not just the hands (which was I understand quite
prevalent) of eunuchs who had not been
completely..errr...neutered.
I am still curious as to exactly why these Indians submitted to the
procedure. Maybe you are right jb (your post came up before I had
completed this). However as I noted in my fourth paragraph Indian
eunuchs can hardly seem to be "a culturally acceptable
group".
Ah, Shem, seems to have gotten to the heart of the matter. I can
see that. Thanks.
"I am also told that mature males who are castrated generally
retain all or most of their sex drive."
Okay, so much for that idea. I do know a voluntary eunuch, as well
as two post-op transsexuals, and all of them do have sexual
relations with other people, so I should have known that there's no
easy celibacy in this world... sigh...
Anyway, I think the reasoning that harem-eunuchs were castrated had
more to do with paternity than whether or not they'd screw the
women in the harem. Even the most virile turkish sultan couldn't
possibly have the drive to satisfy his whole harem, after all. As
vasectomies were not yet an option at that point in history, taking
the whole gonad was the obvious procedure.
Imagine what it would be like if the IRS was entirely staffed by
drag queens.
*shudders*
I'd get my balls cut off and go back for my PhD...
unfortunately that's not an option. Yet.
Sure it is. *sharpening knife*
"Hence castration of rapists which was at one time fairly common
in Scandinavia was a total failure (except possibly as a means to
humiliate the offender). Thus it is important to perform the
procedure at an early enough age."
One can only hope they are able to find the rape gene in children
early enough to nip it in the bud.
By the time you finished your PhD, they probably will have
figured out how to put 'em back.
Especially if, as planned, his thesis is "Testicle Reattachment in
Postgraduate Candidates"
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245