Jesse Walker | November 8, 2006
The FCC has accepted the argument that (a) it's OK to broadcast the word "bullshitter" during a news interview, and (b) the category "news interview" is broad enough to include a chat with a contestant from Survivor Vanuatu.
First Amendment fans shouldn't get too excited, though. Two
other indecency rulings went the other way, and Michael Powell's
successor as FCC chairman, Emeric
Pressburger Kevin Martin, shows no sign of retiring
his role as censor-in-chief. "Hollywood continues to argue they
should be able to say the F-word on television whenever they want,"
he said. "The commission again disagrees."
And then there's this:
Broadcasters, who had challenged the original ruling as unconstitutional, ... reiterated their long-standing complaint that FCC guidelines remain inconsistent and murky.
And one commissioner, Jonathan S. Adelstein, alleged that the reversals were not made on merit but to improve the agency's chances of winning the broadcasters' lawsuit by jettisoning its weakest parts.
"Litigation strategy should not be the dominant factor guiding policy when 1st Amendment protections are at stake," Adelstein said.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245