David Weigel | November 1, 2006
Hey, raise your hand and shake your wrist if you're convinced by
this anti-gay marriage ad out of Wisconsin, by the Coalition for
America's Families.
Is the point that kids are so stupid that gay marriages will make
them forget (or never learn) the differences between big boys and
big girls? Is it that gay marriage will cause a physiological chain
reaction transmogrifying American adults into hermaphrodites? It
can't be that legal gay marriage is going to make kids grow up in a
world where heterosexual relationships become incomprensible; if
that was the case, the ad makers would have taken their cameras to
Massachusetts and just started filming the atrocities. Unless...
maybe there aren't any atrocities?
(Headline explained here.)
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
"Is it that gay marriage will cause a physiological chain
reaction transmogrifying American adults into
hermaphrodites?"
Kickass!
Hilarious Onion link, depressing political ad. Clearly, we'll never be able to explain something as complex and bizarre as homosexuality to children without destroying their comprehension of heterosexuality. Apparently, they're like matter and anti-matter.
Maybe the kids in this ad wouldn't be so confused if they weren't forced to wear so much makeup.
"It can't be that legal gay marriage is going to make kids grow
up in a world where heterosexual relationships become
incomprensible"
Straight marriage did it to me.
Hey heres a crazy idea... How about the Gvmnt get out of the
marriage sanctioning business ALL TOGETHER! Ultimately this entire
matter is about the G&L crowd getting those benefits afforded
to Hetero couples based on their marital status, right? So if the
state weren't the arbitor of the validity of someones marital
status, and doled out whatever benefits were available on
individual merit, wouldn't the whole thing be a moot point?
Why is it the role of gvmt at any level to sanctify marriage? Those
who are Christian and/or hetero (I qualify for both) need only have
their marital relationship sanctified by the church in which they
are married.
The gvmt sould get out of the marriage business altogether... And
while their at it, they (in VA) should get out of the liquor sales
business as well!
Oh, it should definitely be marriage only by churches, and all the government does is hand out civil union licenses, which are merely a legal document stating who your partner is in case you die or become extremely ill.
The only difference this ad makes clear about kids who are the
product of legally sanctioned gay marriage v. unmarried gay
relationships is that in one case grandma would have to explain why
Heather's two mommies were married and in the other case
why they were not. I'm pretty sure kids can handle this
one.
The facts are just as relevant in non-gay relationships. (I'm a
dude, and my girlfriend's nieces are always asking her why we live
together but aren't married.)
Why is a candidate for treasurer running on an anti-gay marriage platform? Or did I misunderstand the "authorized by..." blurb at the end of the ad?
I assume that person is probably the treasurer of the group "Vote Yes For Marriage."
Anna and Eve huh? I never heard that one before. Seriously though, if I were on the fence on this subject, I highly doubt this ad would sway me either way. I just found it kinda funny.
It's not for the center, it's telling evangelicals to get out and vote next Tuesday or our children will be turned into gayosexuals.
I guess the children they hopelessly confused in the making of this ad were collateral damage.
"Ultimately this entire matter is about the G&L crowd
getting those benefits afforded to Hetero couples based on their
marital status, right? So if the state weren't the arbitor of the
validity of someones marital status, and doled out whatever
benefits were available on individual merit, wouldn't the whole
thing be a moot point?"
You're asking for disestablishment of courts by gov't?
So the kids with two mommies or two daddies are going to be
totally confused.
As opposed to the kids in hetrosexual blended families who have a
birth mommy and step daddy and his two kids and the stepbrother and
step sister's birth mother and her boyfriend, and a birth father
and his current 18-year-old girlfriend who at least is a little
better than the bitch homewrecker who broke up the marriage. And no
one can keep track of which grandparents and aunts and uncles are
still in the loop.
Holy shit, where to begin with this one?
First of all, the people who created this ad are putting forth the
argument that government should make no decisions that aren't
clearly understood by a six year old.
Secondly, if we do this, kids will start to think that things like
the Adam and Eve myth are so old fashioned. Umm...hopefully?
Pretty soon, they might be rejecting the Earth-centric universe,
spontaneous generation, and demonic possession as a cause of
disease.
The best answer to "If grandpa was a girl, would he still be
grandpa" is "No, and you wouldn't exist to ask that question now,
would you?".
Good lord...I think I lost 20 IQ points watching that gibberish. Do these clueless bigots really expect such crap to have any effect on anyone who hadn't already drunk their Kool-Aid?
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245