Jacob Sullum | October 26, 2006
Maybe I'm racially insensitive, but I don't get the
uproar
over the
ad in which a hot chick says she met Harold E. Ford, the
Tennessee Democrat running for the U.S. Senate, at a
Playboy party and asks him to call her. A Vanderbilt
expert on political advertising says it "makes the Willie Horton ad
look like child's play." Really? It's worse for voters to think
that beautiful women want to have sex with you that it is for them
to believe that you let a dangerous criminal out of prison to
commit rape and murder? I think Michael Dukakis would disagree. He
could have benefited from this sort of slander, if anyone would
have believed it.
I know, I know: Ford is black, and the actress in the commercial is white, so obviously the folks who produced the spot were targeting Tennesseeans enlightened enough to vote for a black Senate candidate but racist enough to change their minds if they suspect he might date white women. Maybe. But it seems to me their point was that Ford is a shallow, morally loose pretty boy, especially since the spot opens with another fake man-on-the-street interview in which a black woman says, "Harold Ford looks nice. Isn't that enough?" Scurrilous, yes. Racist, no.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245