Nick Gillespie | October 19, 2006
The Wall Street Journal reports on the secret plans of Dems if and when they take over the House of Representatives: An email written by a member of Congress reveals that the Donkey Party will "plot to establish a Department of Peace, raise your taxes and minimize penalties for crack dealers."
Oh, wait: That email was written by the House Majority Whip, Missouri Republican Roy Blunt, and says far more about mounting GOP hysteria than anything about their rivals.
And that sort of thing doubtless helps explain why Congress' approval ratings are lingering around the mid-teens longer than Mark Foley on a Saturday night:

Possible sop to Republicans: The Journal points out that while just 16 percent of voters approve of Congress as whole (or perhaps more accurately, as a 'hole), some 39 percent think their crook deserves reelection. By the same token, "In October 1994, with the public fed up with scandals and the failure of President Clinton and his party's lawmakers to deliver in key areas such as health care, voters said by a nine-point margin -- 46% to 37% -- that they wanted Republicans to take control. That compares with the 15-point margin today in favor of Democrats' taking the reins."
More here, for folks with a subscription to the WSJ.
Hat tip: Film critic extraordinaire Alan Vanneman.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Thats just what the donks WANT to do, Not what they think they can do. Isn't that right Joe?
"plot to establish a Department of Peace, raise your taxes and
minimize penalties for crack dealers"
Two outta 3 ain't bad.
I find it hysterical that the people who brought us Department
of Homeland Security: America Uber Alles! are terrified of a
"Department of Peace". Come on, what's another department among
friends?
I thought the only Dem that actually supported that idea with
Dennis Kucinich. And again, how much power does he have? Nil. Or
close to it.
That, and I doubt they could pull off a tax increase even if they
wanted to (which is debatable). As for crack dealers, I wouldn't
mind removing the penalties for posession and sale altogether...
but that's another story.
If Blunt is going to scare me, he's going to have to try
harder.
(BTW, what, exactly, would a Department of Peace do? I'm still a
little confused, as I don't think "Nuke the Moon" is what they have
in mind...)
As long as the "Department of Peace" doesn't involve any Orwellian irony, and as long as the tax increase comes with spending cuts, I don't have a problem with *any* of that.
Hmm... just read the Wikipedia entry. It has a little more
support than I thought. Sounds like another stupid and unnecessary
bureaucracy to me, but I'd take it over the DHS and the Patriot Act
any day and Sunday.
On the other hand, I believe we should establish a Department of
Peace Enhancement (DOPE), which would be geared around distributing
chemicals that would make the general populous more peaceful... the
acronym says it all...
What, exactly, would a Department of Peace do?
Keep the Peace by hiring hundreds of bureaucrats (damn that's a
hard world to spell) to look busy doing the important work of the
Department of Peace.
Go on expensive fact-finding missions to every place in the world
where facts about peace are to be found.
Spend their entire budget and then ask for increased funding next
year. Use this money to hire more bureaucrats.
All kinds of expensive things that have nothing to do with
peace.
Where do I sign up for a party that will plot to establish a Department of crack dealers, raise your Peace and minimize penalties for taxes?
Abdul:
I think the Guns and Dope party includes all of those in their
platform...
1994: "The Dems are corrupt and aren't getting anything done, so
let's let the Republicans take over!"
2006: "The Republicans are corrupt and aren't getting anything
done, so let's let the Dems take over!"
Vicious cycle, much?
lingering around the mid-teens longer than Mark Foley on a
Saturday night
oh, dip!
Thats pretty snappy. Then again maybe i'm easily humored.
I really would rather wait until the elections are over to think
about this crap.
JG
A libertarian staffer wrote that list. Talk about your cognitive
dissonance.
Full list:
Department of Peace and Nonviolence Act - H.R. 3760: Dennis
Kucinich (D-OH) and 74 Democratic cosponsors propose a new
Department of Peace and Nonviolence" as well as "National Peace
Day." Cosponsors include three would-be Democratic Chairmen: John
Conyers (Judiciary), George Miller (Education and the Workforce),
and Charlie Rangel (Ways and Means).
Gas Stamps - H.R. 3712: Jim McDermott (D-WA) and eight Democratic
cosponsors want a "Gas Stamps" program similar to the Food Stamps
program to subsidize the gasoline purchases of qualified
individuals.
Less Jail Time for Selling Crack Cocaine - H.R. 2456: Charlie
Rangel (D-MI) and 23 Democratic cosponsors want to eliminate
mandatory minimum sentences for possessing, importing, and
distributing crack cocaine. John Conyers, the would-be Chairman of
the Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over the bill, is a
cosponsor.
Voting Rights for Criminals - H.R. 1300: John Conyers (D-MI) and 32
Democratic cosponsors, and H.R. 663: Charlie Rangel (D-NY) and 28
Democratic cosponsors would let convicted felons vote. Rep. John
Conyers is the would-be Democratic Chairman of the Judiciary
Committee which would consider this legislation.
Expand Medicare to Include Diapers - H.R. 1052: Barney Frank (D-MA)
supports Medicare coverage of adult diapers. Barney Frank is the
would-be Chairman of the Financial Services Committee.
Nationalized Health Care - H.R. 4683: John Dingell (D-MI) and 18
Democratic cosponsors want to expand Medicare to cover all
Americans. John Dingell is the would-be Democratic Chairman of the
Energy and Commerce Committee who along with cosponsors Charlie
Rangel, would-be Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, and
Henry Waxman, would-be Chairman of the Government Reform Committee,
would have jurisdiction over the proposal.
Federal Regulation of Restaurant Menus - H.R. 5563: Rosa DeLauro
(D-CT) and 25 Democratic cosponsors authorize federal regulation of
the contents of restaurant menus.
Taxpayer Funded Abortions & Elimination of all Restrictions on
Abortion, Including Parental Notice - H.R. 5151: Jerrold Nadler
(D-NY) and 66 Democratic cosponsors want to overturn even minimal
restrictions on abortion such as parental notice requirements. The
bill would also require taxpayer funding of abortions through the
various federal health care programs. John Conyers, the would-be
Chairman of Judiciary Committee which has jurisdiction over the
bill, is an original cosponsor.
Bill of Welfare Rights - H.J. Res. 29-35: Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL)
proposes a Soviet-style "Bill of Welfare Rights," enshrining the
rights of full employment, public education, national healthcare,
public housing, abortion, progressive taxation, and union
membership. On some these measures, Rep. Jackson is joined by up to
35 Democratic cosponsors, including would-be Judiciary Committee
Chairman John Conyers.
H.R. 5563: Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and 25 democratic cosponsors
authorize federal regulation of the contents of restaurant
menus.
I hope they regulate the menus so as to guarantee the presence of
greasy beef burritos and X-tra large, salt-rimmed margaritas - but
that's probably not what they have in mind.
S. 799 looks like another liberal winner:
http://www.aaf.org/government/issue_obesity.html
jason:
That's a scary list, except for Less Jail Time for Selling Crack
Cocaine. That looks OK to me, although I don't advocate using the
stuff.
"H.R. 1052: Barney Frank (D-MA) supports Medicare coverage of
adult diapers."
That's not too bad. It just sounds funny if you say it aloud.
The voting rights for convicted felons isn't a bad one either. In Florida, once convicted of a felony you are ineligble to vote, even after having served your sentence. This is one of the commonly quoted reasons that the 2000 election in FL went for Bush. I am not sure how much I believe that enough former felons would have voted, but I know at least one personally who would have.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245