Jesse Walker | September 29, 2006
Little known facts:
1. You know that Superman vs. Muhammed Ali comic book? It isn't the world's strangest pop culture crossover.
2. You know that Star Wars Christmas special? It isn't the most deranged Star Wars spinoff.
Behold: You got Star Wars in my Sesame Street!
Bonus link: Star Wars on The Muppet Show. This one isn't quite as shocking, because (a) I remember seeing it when I was a kid, which softens the blow, and (b) it's actually better than any of the Star Wars sequels or prequels.
Would-be Jedi Knights are invited to stop by our comments section, where we welcome your thoughts on the continuity issues raised by these broadcasts.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
``It's funny until somebody loses an eye. Then it's still funny,
just not around that person,'' is the full quote, found on usenet a
couple decades ago.
Warning succumbs to observation.
You know, Jesse, I liked you until you just took a gratuitous swipe at the the Star Wars theatrical releases. Burn in hell....a jedi-less hell.
Oh, and by the way, I know �jedi-less hell� is redundant. Anyplace with Jedis is a hell.
Of course I meant Anyplace WITHOUT Jedis is a hell. I'm
just flustered with my rage over your swipe at Star Wars.
Oh, and by the way, as often as the reason staff smoke Captain
Kirk�s pole around here, I thought you guys might actually
appreciate real science fiction like Star Wars. I guess I
was wrong.
Star Trek is so bad that I defy anyone to refute the following
sentence; �The best thing that ever happened to Star Trek is
Ricardo Montalban.�
Enough said.
Cab, we welcome your thoughts on the continuity issues raised by these broadcasts.
...and answer me this: Do any of those Star Wars sequels have a scene where C-3PO tapdances? Huh? Well, that Muppet Show episode does. Therefore it's better. QED.
continuity...CONTINUITY? Who can think of continuity at a time
like this? You have, purposefully mind you, degraded the Star Wars
theatrical releases. Blasphemous if you ask me.
(Have you seen the special about the wookie family? That one is so
bad even I couldn�t watch it...and I named my first born son
Luke)
Have you seen the special about the wookie
family?
I sure have. I watched almost all of it, because I'm an aficionado
of really, really, really bad ideas, but even I had to hit
fast-forward when Bea Arthur started to sing.
Sorry, I just figured out it was part of the christmas special you linked to already. I'm dumb.
Did this Sesame St. thing actually air?
According to that unimpeachable source, the Internet, it
aired over two separate episodes in 1979.
"it's actually better than any of the Star Wars sequels or
prequels."
Put down the crack pipe, Jesse; The Empire Strikes Back is
the best of the films.
One more train wreck of an idea for you, Jesse.
Redd Fox as Okey Ben Pinocchi, "a stately but slightly deceased
Jedi."
http://www.timewarptv.com/Default.aspx?tabid=143
Star Trek is so bad that I defy anyone to refute the
following sentence; �The best thing that ever happened to Star Trek
is Ricardo Montalban.�
The only possible reply is "Captain Kirk never showed up on Sesame
Street."
And really, Cab, as a former total Star Wars fanatic, everything
having to do with that universe outside of Episodes IV and V has
been an unmitigated disaster.
Brian24, I find your lack of faith disturbing.
I'm going for Mongolian BBQ for lunch. When I get back, if I can
stay awake, I will give you the pounding you so rightly
deserve.
"Captain Kirk never showed up on Sesame Street."
That sentence assumes there is a difference between Star Trek and
Sesame Street.
Redd Fox as Okey Ben Pinocchi, "a stately but slightly
deceased Jedi."
OK, that I need to see.
Put down the crack pipe, Jesse; The Empire Strikes Back is the
best of the films.
It might have been, if it had a little less Jedi mumbo-jumbo and a
little more, um, ending.
The only possible reply is "Captain Kirk never showed up on
Sesame Street."
As a Sesame Street fan, I have to hold that against
Captain Kirk. At least the droids were trying!
Thanks for the Muppet Show link. It reminds me that (1) I did
see this when it first aired and loved it, and (2) I really miss
the Muppet Show, which is still pretty darn funny today.
It's interesting to note what these 3 items show: that, unlike its
most ardent fans (me included), Lucas never took his Star Wars
universe seriously. Those of us who were kids at the time just
didn't really notice how willing he was to sell out the project for
a buck. The second trilogy (and the Ewoks) make so much more sense
in the light of these links.
De rigeur Libertarian boilerplate: of course he has the right to do
whatever he wants with his creations for a buck, regardless of how
horribly it disappoints me, yada yada.
According to that unimpeachable source, the Internet, it
aired over two separate episodes in 1979.
Five year old David watched, and loved every second of it.
Re: Sesame Street episode.
I do recall something about R2-D2 falling in love with a fire
hydrant - and then a mail-box...
"And really, Cab, as a former total Star Wars fanatic,
everything having to do with that universe outside of Episodes IV
and V has been an unmitigated disaster."
A disaster, yes. But the Battle of Endor (the space part, not the
great teddy bear massacre) and the great Jedi action in Eps I-III
do provide some "mitigation".
P.S. -
So noted. They were mitigated disasters. Jedi was further mitigated
by the through-the-woods chase and the oft-mocked Admiral Ackbar
("It's a trap!")
I'm less psyched on the "Jedi action." In the age of Matrix and
Crouching Tiger, I have been pretty unmoved (read: bored) by the
CGI lightsaber fests.
Meh,
Star Wars jumped the shark when Boba Fett, clearly the biggest
baddasss since Sweet Sweetback, died by getting knocked into the
big sandtrap critter in one of the lamest Three Stooges ripoffs
ever to disgrace the big screen.
I think
this tops the list of bizarre and pointless crossovers.
I remember seeing it in the bookstore when it came out, and asked
myself "Why?" It was the first ST book I refused to buy, and it was
the moment at which I decided the whole book series had jumped the
shark.
It seems I will never sell these "She-Hulk vs. Leon Spinks" comics. Worst cross-over ever!
I could not find the original footage of Redd Foxx as Obi-Ben
(this internet thing is good for nothing).
However, I found the next best thing. Yep, you guessed it, an
amateur rap video from 1991 called �The Tampon Vader� that has
snippets of video from the Donnie and Marie special that shows Redd
Foxx in his Jedi attire. In a strange sense, this rap video is even
better than finding the original footage.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5101911187966271593
Ther is no such thing as a good Star Wars movie. Pull a Light Sword on me and I'll take two steps back and zap you with my scrooch gun.
A Light Sword?.......Light Sword? The most
noble, graceful, dignified, science fiction weapon invention of all
time, and you don't even have the common decency to call it by it's
rightful name? I can't get over that....a Light
Sword.......Holy Jesus Mother Mary of Christ our God in
heaven, is nothing sacred anymore?
Light Sword?
In one of the special features things on the DVD for Episode II, George Lucas referred to it as a Laser Sword.
updated link:
"The Tampon Vader" with Redd Foxx and Paul Lynde.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5101911187966271593&q=Tampon+Vader
So the Muppets were libertarian:
The character named "Hogthrob", who is one of the good guys, says
to the effete Hamill, "Who's your tailor; I love that outfit", in
the exact voice one would use to evoke gayness (adjusting for
Muppetitude). A subtle pro-gay message, and no one
boycotting?
The character named "Nader" disables Hamill's laser. Bad guys favor
gun control.
ETC . . .
Cab,
No, nothing is sacred anymore. Actually you took it pretty well, I
expected you to get upset. I don't have anything against the
laser-sabre, I agree it's a cool weapon, but I truely, TRUELY, hate
those Goddamn Star Wars movies.
I felt brain cells running for higher ground at 2:30 into the show. That was mindnumbingly stupid. This coming from someone who recently found himself engrossed in Elmo's take on jackets.
I remember seeing the Muppet Show piece when it ran, and it's still funny. Actually, that show was pretty much always funny. As for the Star Wars, Star Trek cage death match, I'm going to have to get a blog and post pictures of my sons in their Halloween costumes -- Boba Fett and an Imperial Storm Trooper, complete with Tri-Corders and Federation T-shirts.
Oh, and by the way, as often as the reason staff smoke
Captain Kirk�s pole around here, I thought you guys might actually
appreciate real science fiction like Star Wars
Are there any definitions of "science fiction" that favor stories
about knights, old kindly wizards, magic, prophecies, destiny,
villains in dark armor, and ghosts over Trek?.
Not that Trek is great SF, but that's a strange sort of
snobbery.
Star Wars is mostly fantasy, not science fiction. It's not sci-fi just because it's in space.
Are we talking ridiculous crossovers? I'll give you the chief
bull goose looney of ridiculous
crossovers!
If the title characters aren't enough, check out the
bandstand.
Kevin
Come on, I can't be the only person on this planet who thinks
the ultra-arch Muppets are excrutiatingly unfunny...
BTW: here's
a crossover I'll bet they just loved in France...
Sphynx,
I agree, Star Wars and Star Trek is bubblegum Sci-Fi, not the real
deal. Science Fiction Lierature has always been light years ahead
of the movies, except for a few like the ones you mentioned. Also,
2001: A Space Odyssey. You only have to see it 6 or 7 time to
understand it, but it's worth the trip.
Star Wars is not science fiction, it is fantasy with spaceships and energy weapons (that is not intended as a criticism, Star Wars was not meant to be science fiction). Star Trek was science fiction and by the standards of US TV in the '60's, pretty good science fiction.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245