David Weigel | September 11, 2006
Michael Young asks why 9/11 had, and continues to have, so little lasting impact in the Arab world
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Young writes, "It was momentous because the Arabs' refusal to
understand why the United States reacted as it did presaged a
disconnect between the region and the Americans."
Yet it seems that he has very little understanding himself (as do
most Americans) as to why the 9/11 attacks happened in the first
place.
Dan T, it's nice that you recognize your own comment as contentless liberal boilerplate, for why else would you need to explain what you mean?
Why do you expect Arabs to take the gruesome death of 3000
people as a "monumental crime against humanity," when the gruesome
death of 3000 Iraqis every month is considered by
the neo-cons, you, and many Americans as a necessary collateral
damage in building the empire?
America's forcible entry into the Middle East soon became a
case of mutual shunning, conscious or not.
America's entry into the Middle East did not happen after 9/11. It
happened years before 9/11. Are you that ignorant or you just have
selective memory?
America's entry into the Middle East did not happen after
9/11. It happened years before 9/11. Are you that ignorant or you
just have selective memory?
You are so right. Before 9/11 America was giving billions of
dollars a year to Egypt and Jordan and saved Kuwait and the Saudis
asses from Saddam. Those arrogant Americans, they had it
coming.
yup, Chalupa. The US underwrites corrupt thugs such as the
police states of Egypt & Jordan. Tortures, murders and
dissappears any challenge to thier autocracies. Said autocrats live
fat, the other 95% live skinny.
After many years of funding Saddam, and giving him carte blac in
the UN, he slipped his leash.
After US troops removed our former ally/client from Kuwait, the
ruling degenerate came back, hunted down, and had killed those
Kuwaitis who stayed beghind & resisted Iraqi occupation,
recognizing they were a threat to thier racket, i mean,
monarchy.
Ungrateful wretches, the lot.
You are so right. Before 9/11 America was giving billions of
dollars a year to Egypt and Jordan and saved Kuwait and the Saudis
asses from Saddam. Those arrogant Americans, they had it
coming.
My bad. I guess the 200,000+ soldiers that the US sent to the
region in 1990 were members of the peace corp not the US military
and they were dropping food not bombs.
And if you think that supporting the kings in Saudi Arabia or Egypt
will win you support of the Arabs in the street then you are sadly
mistaken. Better change that strategy and save your money.
I didn't say anything about whether the "Americans had it coming or
not." The Americans in the towers certainly didn't. I was just
responding to the idiotic claim that Michael made.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245